Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

D.C. Gay Marriage Referendum Rejected by Elections Board

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:08 PM
Original message
D.C. Gay Marriage Referendum Rejected by Elections Board
Edited on Mon Jun-15-09 04:09 PM by FreeState
Yes! great news...

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/06/15/dc-gay-marriage-referendum-rejected-by-elections-board/

The Board of Elections and Ethics has ruled that a referendum on recognizing gay marriages is not allowed.

Reads the order , signed by both board chair Errol Arthur and member Charles Lowery Jr.:

(I)t is clear that the Referendum’s Proposers would, in contravention of the , strip same-sex couples of the rights and responsibilities of marriage that they were afforded by virtue of entering into valid marriages elsewhere, and that the Council intends to clearly make available to them here in the District, simply on the basis of their sexual orientation. Because the Referendum would authorize discrimination prohibited by the , it is not a proper subject for referendum, and may not be accepted by the Board.


UPDATE, 4:50 P.M.: The order highlights this section of the Human Rights Act: “it shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for a District government agency or office to limit or refuse to provide any facility, service, program, or benefit to any individual on the basis of an individual’s actual or perceived…sexual orientation.”

In a twist of the knife, the order notes that when the referendum and initiative laws were introduced to the council in 1978, it was Councilmember Marion Barry who added the amendment barring laws concerning human-rights matters. Barry, of course, was the only vote against the gay marriage recognition law last month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. A very nice twist of the knife. Screw you, Barry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know, after I have watched a man smoke crack with a hooker,
it's kinda hard for me to take him seriously as a defender of traditional morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Funny how that works, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah. But there is no one so morally squalid that he can't pull rank on the homos.
Funny how that works, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But it was a straight hooker
That makes it OK, you know. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-15-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That is true. Their crack-smoking was intended as a prelude
to some good old-fashioned penis/vagina intercourse, and that makes it holy.

In fact, I bet the angels in heaven were singing when Marion and his hooker did their thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC