Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warren-Endorsed Nigerain Archbishop Backed Anti-Gay Laws Worse than Pre-WWII Third Reich's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:58 PM
Original message
Warren-Endorsed Nigerain Archbishop Backed Anti-Gay Laws Worse than Pre-WWII Third Reich's
The Kampala Monitor reports:

Dr (Rick) Warren said that homosexuality is not a natural way of life and thus not a human right. "We shall not tolerate this aspect at all," Dr Warren said.


Warren-Endorsed Nigerian Archbishop Backed Anti-Gay Laws Worse Than Pre-WWII Third Reich's

Bruce Wilson
December 24, 2008


Many sharp journalists, such as Michelle Goldberg, Sarah Posner and Max Blumenthal, are cranking their talents into exposing the angry underbelly beneath Rick Warren's carefully airbrushed and polished public persona. And, a number of political bloggers (1, 2, 3) have noted Rick Warren's support for the virulently anti-gay Archbishop of Nigeria, Peter Akinola, but the story has lacked some needed historical context; In 2006, Warren publicly lionized (literally) Akinola three months after the Archbishop had endorsed legislation more draconian than comparable anti-gay statutes passed prior to World War Two under the Third Reich.

As I described in a December 18, 2006 Talk To Action story, a schismatic faction of Virginia Episcopalian churches had just voted to align themselves with the Archbishop of Nigeria, Peter Akinola, who earlier that year had thrown his substantial political weight and religious authority behind draconian Nigerian anti-gay legislation to, among other strictures, "make it illegal for gay men and lesbians to form organizations, read gay literature or eat together in a restaurant."

Although I missed it at the time, the proposed legislation was apparently denounced, according to the current Wikipedia writeup on Akinola, by the US State Department: "The proposed legislation was formally challenged by the United States State Department as a breach of Nigeria's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights."

It was one of those rare examples from the last eight years, it would seem, in which United States foreign policy clearly aligned in support of basic human rights. Rick Warren, however, appeared to be on the other side of the issue.

In my post, I went on to chart, in very specific detail, the ugly reality that the Akinola-supported legislation was actually harsher than similar anti-gay legislation, 1935 revisions to Paragraph 175 of the German penal code, applying to homosexuality, voted into law during the early years of Hitler's Third Reich.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/warren-endorsed-nigerian_b_153412.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. That Nigerian guy is CRAZY. And, yes, Warren endorses him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And by default, so does Obama
Admit it, Obama, you never vetted Warren anymore than you did Wright or Farrakhan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Geez, the guy is reading an invocation, not making policy.
Obama's not "endorsing" Warren's views, he's using a 3-minute invocation spot to extend an olive branch to the half of America who values what people like Warren have to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Might as well invite some skin heads, according to your reasoning
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Skinheads vote too...and we'l need them if we're going to change things.
Not "we" as a political party, "we" as a nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Now I've heard it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Use the old paradigm. Fight the opposition rather than look for consensus.
How's that working for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I do give you credit
You're the first DUer to openly say you're okay with reaching out to neo-Nazi's. Normally, people are only willing to reach out to homophobes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Your solution miscalculates the monster and does not work what so ever.
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 01:41 AM by bluedawg12
"Warren isn't a monster. He's consistent and while his views may be offensive to many of us, he's consistent and he seems to care less about the legal issues than the spiritual issues. He's entitled to do that." - MercutioATC

"Warren is not the enemy. He's representative of a segment of society that we need on board. If you listen to him, he's really not an opponent of legal equality, he's just rabidly defending what he sees as a moral issue."MercutioATC

Warren's involvement in rescinding established marriage rights were no threat to his Church or theology.
In rabidly defending moral issues he crosses over into civil law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Let me think... exactly how often has Democratic leadership actually fought for anything in recent
years?

I mean, other than for Bush policy against their own base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Fumbled the ball on the Downing Street Memos. lotsa evidence to impeach there!
Pelosi's impeachment is off the table edict. Now there is retreat on repeal of DADT, an issue with national security implications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. What the fuck board am I on?
I thought I typed in democraticunderground.com, but I must have typed freerepublic.com by accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. It seems that way, but it's just that clever "paradigm shift" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Bullshit
Obama IS ENDORSING WARREN.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. and poking the olive branch in the eye of those of us who think Warren's a hypocrite and a bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. To be fair there is a more detailed explanation here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is all really sad
Obama's team *has* to be aware of this. Do they think (like Bush's crew) that we won't notice when they screw up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They hope that would be the case
However, because of the stupidity and blatant pandoring to the extreme right wing, he has effectively caused this now to be the focus of his inauguration

What an stupid move
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. People who get away with everything tend to think they can get away with everything. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. I suspect they regret this choice by now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great....
Just fucking great... x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is Akinola available to give the Inaugural Invocation?
Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I am sure that they can make room for Akinola
We need more of this "reaching out" to bigots to heal the nation, "at the expense of the marginalized" as Episcopal Bishop Chane so eloquently said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Replace "homosexuality" with "color television" in the OP's quote.
Being gay is perfectly natural for people who are gay. Television is not natural for anyone. If that is the basis of legal prohibition, then color TV, cars, indoor plumbing, refrigeration, medicine and anything that prevents us from being in constant danger of starvation is unnatural and should not be tolerated.

assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wait a minute. DOCTOR Warren?!
What the hell is his doctorate in? Con artistry? Dumbassology?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC