Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Haves vs. Have-Nots at Public Universities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:38 PM
Original message
Haves vs. Have-Nots at Public Universities
The University of California, which has already received $716 million in federal stimulus funds to offset a $1 billion budget gap, announced on Friday that it is raising student fees by 32 percent. That works out to about $2,500 per student a year.

Student protesters said that the higher costs will make it even harder for middle class and poor students to go to college, and will widen the education gap between the haves and the have-nots. But the students at the 10-campus California system are, on average, from far wealthier backgrounds than the average household in the state. This gap is pronounced at other prominent public universities, like Michigan and Virginia.

As they deal with tighter budgets, what should public universities do to balance fiscal responsibility and equal opportunity?

http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/haves-vs-have-nots-at-public-universities/?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ahnold is destroying the state of CA nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, Californians are doing it all by themselves.
And they've been doing it for decades. They want everything but don't want to pay for it. They tie the hands of the legislature and the governor, get pissed, and run a bunch more initiatives to make it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The governor's hands are hardly tied.
"California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger informed lawmakers in his state Wednesday that he will not sign any budget-balancing plan that includes a tax increase, period."

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/06/18/Safety%20Net%20Failure%20in%20California/

I guess "Californians are doing it all by themselves" by electing morons like Arnold, but by the same token Americans started the Iraq war by electing Dubya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Gray Davis suffered the same fate.
It will not end anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Please explain this to me
A neighbor of mine will gradualte his youngest child from University of Houston Clear Lake next month, we live out of teh local community college district (San Jacinto College) she he had to pay higher rates but it cost him $6K total, for 2 years there then I quote about $20K for the last 2 years. This kid studied engineering has has a job lined up with a oil company. Texas can make this happen for under $30K total why can not CA? As a disclaimer he did stay home and not in a dorm but he lived under 10 miles form both schools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It has to do with the funding base of the school.
It costs about the same amount of money to educate a college student for 4 years at a full-blown university no matter where they go. Some schools have more expenses due to higher salaries, more building, etc. It it is all privately funded, the cost is about $20,000 per semester. If some student at a full university is paying less, it is because costs are being defrayed, usually by the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Prop 13 got Californians used to the idea that they didn't have to pay
for anything.

Either coast on what people had paid before, or float bond issues so their kids pay later.

Elect a governator with no fiscal foresight who goes along with the plan.

Voila! Disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. remember too that California has a 3-tiered university system...
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 01:44 PM by mike_c
...and that UC is the top tier, supposedly targeted at the top ten percent of prospective students. It was designed to be somewhat "elite" in that respect, although in practice it is not as restrictive as that makes it sound (and it was supposed to be nearly free to attend, like all California universities). The California State University, or CSU, fills in most of the need for the rest of the state's university students, and its fees are considerably lower. Direct costs for non-resident students (i.e. not including dorm costs) are still under $2000 per semester if I'm not mistaken, even with the recent 32% fee increase we've seen, too. This is highly state subsidized, of course-- the last time I checked, student fees paid about 20% of the total cost of tuition at the CSU where I work.

The third tier is the community college system, which is extremely inexpensive to attend. At any rate, my point is the the UC system is not the benchmark for the cost of higher education for most californians, not by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. If it weren't for the CA community college system,
nobody in my family would have attended college.

Getting the first 2 years done affordably means a BA is not out of reach.

The massive amount of debt required for the working poor to attend college leaves it out of reach for too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC