Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another question for the DU Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:26 PM
Original message
Another question for the DU Group
I am not trying to be trite, but my church is death on abortion as a sin.

I am no longer so sure, can one be a decent Christian and still see merit in allowing abortion as it is in the US today? (I don't favor abortion on demand for anything, but I also don't think that abortion on demand of frivolous is the way it is currently being conducted in the US either).:shrug:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Real Christians let God do the judging. If you do not approve of abortion
don't have one. Get your religion out of my doctors office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. is it true that most late term abortions are because
there is something wrong with the baby. Like mental retardation! Wonder what the percentage of down syndrome babies is today compared to when abortion and down detection in utero became available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The something wrong is not Downs - no spine, lacking a brain, bad heart
Thank God we no longer force a women to re-absorb the tissues in the fetus when a dead fetus refuses to abort.

Almost all of the late abortions would die in a few days if brought to term and born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Abortion is never mentioned in the Old or New Testament.
If it was critical to Christianity it would have been mentioned as a tenet of early Judaism or in the preaching of Jesus. It is not simply a new practice that was not known about in earlier times. The only quote churches can really use is from a song in Psalms that says God knows us in the womb. If it is so important to Christianity: make them show you where it is written in scripture. It is not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually harm to the fetus is mentioned - as a property crime before the
quickening - a human death afterwards (Old Testament's many rules)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pelagius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Many denominations support the right to choose.
Here's a statement from the Episcopal Church. It affirms the right to choose, but does so in a Christian moral context. It's worth reading:

http://www.episcopalarchives.org/cgi-bin/acts_new/acts_resolution.pl?resolution=1994-A054
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. I do not mean this discussion to be contentious
I really am serious about this, I know that people tend to push a hot button on this ( I did so yesterday without thinking) but it seems to me that God is not so angry as some would have us believe.

I think that God understands the complex nature of the world as now exists and will/is there to help us understand it (including the difficult nature of abortion).

All I am saying is that I am not a strident anti-abortion type and I do not feel comfrotable being lumped in with religious types who are.

I also have received a large amount of piece and solace in my religion so I am not willing that religion should be thought of as something quaint and antiquated and no longer valid due to science ot the scientific method.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I am in your pew/church - and there are long discussions in the first
1000 years of the Church of when is it a human death.

"God made man in his own image" led to a priest looking at the abortion and seeing if it looked like a man (this lasted to a few hundred years ago).

The property crime before quickening was also standard justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. a couple of things
1. there are relatively very few women who actually have abortions - it IS a big deal and having an abortion can change someone's life as much as having a baby.
2. I seriously doubt that in great majority of those cases that those decisions are made frivolously or without a great deal of personal pain and doubt.
3. one of the things a woman has to decide is what's right and fair for the child that the fetus will become. It is reality - raising a child in a situation that will hurt the child developmentally, or giving the child away into an already overloaded adoption system, or in a situation where the child will be hungry or homeless or severely disadvantaged is wrong. Which wrong is wronger? It's not clear to me but I'm not the one who has to carry the baby to term, or take care of it for the next lifetime when I might not even have enough resources to take care of myself.

The "rights" and "wrongs" aren't black and white. The church loves to draw the line of distinction on defining life, forgetting that there are two lives involved, but then often says the life of a clump of cells outweighs the life of the fully grown human mother. I think that's the real tragedy - because if it really were all that black and white there wouldn't be an argument about it.

Are you a good christian if you knowingly condemn a clump of cells in your uterus to a life of misery and difficulty? I think you are a better christian if you consider everything honestly first, but ultimately I think it's a woman's choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pelagius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well said! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. what does Christianity even have to do with it?
:shrug:

are there Biblical passages, words from Jesus, that specifically mention such things?

No, there are not

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. I believe it falls in the "Free Will" catagory
God gave us Free Will, it's not for anyone other than ourselves to judge...it shouldn't be a matter of man made laws or of anyone else...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even the popes have flipflopped on this
It's a sin!
It's not a sin!
It's a sin until "quickening"!

The church's opinions on a lot of issues vary throughout the ages. This should be a clue that either: God is a flip flopper (not likely), or man's interpretation of the bible is sometimes flawed.

Ignoring that aspect, though, what one church considers a sin is not necessarily what should be imposed on others. Religious law is for the followers of the church. No meat on Friday for Catholics is a good example. Maybe they think it's a sin, but you don't see them trying to prevent restaurants nationwide from serving meat on Fridays. Kosher food - how would you feel if you were told you had to eat Kosher for the rest of your life - because it's God's will? Or let's say females have to wear burkas and cannot eat in the presence of a man who isn't their husband, because it's a sin?

You would likely think it was ridiculous to impose that on you, because it's not part of your faith.

I respect your beliefs, I respect your right to follow them, but I don't respect your right to impose them on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I do not want to impose my faith on any one
"I respect your beliefs, I respect your right to follow them, but I don't respect your right to impose them on me."

Thank you, I would consider it rude in the extreme if I tried to impose or coerce my faith on you. You should/must have the right to choose your beliefs on your own terms, not mine or any governments.O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. You can be for abortion rights and be a Christian.
Maybe you think that abortion is a sin. That's okay. However, don't you think it should be left between a doctor and his/her patient? There are lots of reasons for a woman to feel the need to have an abortion, and the government can't possibly cover all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I agree with you Jackie
:yourock:

BTW: I don't think it is a sin any more (my church still does though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Cool.
Maybe you should check out more liberal churches. I've been where you've been, sort of. I was a closet pro-choicer (although I still thought it was a sin at the time). Are you open with them, or are you keeping it to yourself? It's not good to have to hide things if you are. Sorry if I'm intruding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. religious advice from an atheist
and a Canadian at that.

Up here, ALL of the mainstream protestant churches oppose the introduction of legislation criminalizing abortion, or restricting access to abortion in any way. (At present, and since a Supreme Court judgment in 1988 ruling the then abortion law unconstitutional, we have no legislation concerning abortion at all, except to provide that it must be covered under the universal public health plans.)

"Mainstream" excludes Baptists, who make up less than 5% of the population here. On the other hand, the population runs about 45% Roman Catholic (I think that's the 1991 census figure; the 2001 census figure may be a bit lower, but I'm speaking from memory here, being short of time). And we of no religious affiliation make up nearly 20% of the population, about double the figure in the US.

Because of the prevalence of Roman Catholicism -- in large part accounted for by Quebec, and its majority French-speaking RC population -- we have a lot of RC politicians. The present PM is an anglo RCer; the one before him was a franco RCer, and in fact our PMs have been RC all the way back to the 60s (three more anglos and a franco, Trudeau).

Pierre Trudeau was RC, and introduced the legislation in the late 60s that liberalized divorce, decriminalized various previously illegal varieties of sex between consenting adults, and started to liberalize access to abortion (allowed for life/health reasons, which came to be interpreted so broadly as to be non-existent, with approval by a hospital committee). The French-speaking population of Quebec, which mainly still self-identifies as RC, is just like the rest of us if not more so when it comes to contraception, abortion, allowing same-sex marriage, cohabitation and child-rearing without marriage, etc.

The Canadian public, in general, really doesn't care what anybody's religion is, largely because the Canadian public would simply not stand for anybody governing the country by religious belief. And we don't take kindly to interference in politics by religious authorities in matters of fundamental rights (like access to abortion and the legality of same-sex marriage, e.g.). A couple of RC bishops have recently threatened the PM and other politicians with excommunication, and nobody gives a damn.

The United Church of Canada is the largest protestant denomination, followed by the Anglicans (Episcopalian equivalents). Both are extremely "liberal". In fact, they'd probably be regarded as commies south of the border. ;)

Our universal health care system was first brought into existence by the then Premier of Saskatchewan, the late Tommy Douglas (the "father of Canadian medicare" ... and grandfather of Kiefer Sutherland) -- recently voted by the national television audience as the Greatest Canadian. He was an ordained Baptist minister, and subsequently the national leader of the New Democratic Party, our social-democrat party, for which a woman's right to choose is a fundamental principle. There was never a more "decent Christian" than Tommy, one of the most decent people ever to walk the earth. Bill Blaikie, a long-time NDP member of Parliament, is also ordained, in the United Church.

I think I'm babbling. What I'm getting at is that "religion" comes in a lot of stripes, and the public face of the Christian church as one all too often sees it in the US is not all there is. There are progressive elements in all churches (I've known a lot of very progressive RCers, for instance), and there are churches that are, as institutions, progressive. I have no truck with religion, but religious people are not the same thing, and are not all the same.

It's not my job to decide who is a "good Christian" and who isn't, but it seems to me that operating from compassion and respect for other people should have a lot to do with it.

If you're curious about foreign ways of doing things, have a look at http://www.united-church.ca/
and some of the issues stuff there: http://www.united-church.ca/justice/

Have you ever done any of the find your perfect religion quizzies?
http://selectsmart.com/RELIGION/
You might find that a more compassionate and respectful denomination is more suited to you. You change, you may need to change your affiliation to reflect those changes in order to be comfortable. If you really don't believe that abortion is a "sin" (and I suspect there are other things that you disagree, or will come to disagree, with your church about), you could probably be happier, and do more good, somewhere else.

If you could possibly get hold of an out of print book by the late Mark MacGuigan, a former Minister of Justice in Canada, then a Federal Court judge, and a legal scholar ... and Roman Catholic ... (and, from my little personal contact with him, a nice guy) called "Abortion, Conscience and Democracy", you might find it interesting and helpful. Here's a slightly disapproving article about it:
http://gvanv.com/compass/arch/v1305/keating.html
I see there's one available in Australia
http://www.abetitles1.com/Title/116892/Abortion+Conscience+and+Democracy.html
but you should be able to get it on inter-library loan elsewhere.

Some of my best friends are Christian (well, okay, not many ... ;) ), and if you're a Christian who respects everybody else and honours their right to live their own lives, and attempts to help rather than hurt others, you'll be okay by me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
choicevoice Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. If you don't favor abortion on demand
May I ask how the determination is to be made as to who can obtain an abortion. Who should make that determination for me? Some church? Some politician? Do I submit my name to a panel?

It is none of any of their or YOUR business. My reproduction is determined by me with the assistance from my doctor and hopefully some caring friends and/or partner/spouse, etc. if i so choose to ask for their input. Strangers, religious officials and politicians can all kiss my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Read some of these stories
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 01:50 PM by MountainLaurel
And tell me which is the "Christian" choice: safe access to abortion, or women dying with their intestines hanging out their vaginas?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=217x976
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Many Christian Denominations oppose criminalizing abortion
Here is a list from the Religous Coalition for Reproductive Choice:

http://www.rcrc.org/pdf/We_affirm.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. I would say not, I'm afraid.

I'm in favour of abortion being available on demand, but I'm an atheist; and if I were to be converted to christianity in a flash of blue light I would change my mind.

I believe that abortion is murder, or morally equivalent to murder, if and only if a foetus is a person. I think most people, on both sides of the debate, subscribe to either both of those or neither, and thus agree with me.

I believe that the defining property of a person is the mind, i.e. self-awareness, and that abortion should be legal on demand in the first two trimesters, when a foetus is still not self aware, and in many cases in the third, where its mind is still so undeveloped as to be effectively not.

Christianity teaches that the defining property of a person is the soul, which enters into the body at conception. If I believed this, I would believe that abortion be treated as murder, although the fact that the victim was not self aware and could well be a threat to the mother would be very considerable mitigating factors.

I'd still probably support the use of contraception, though I'd have to research it a bit.


I don't believe it's possible to be simultaneously

1) Christian
2) Pro-choice
3) Logically consistant in one's beliefs

I don't follow 1), do follow 2) and aspire to 3), although I often fail to attain it. If I were a christian, I would sacrifice 2) rather than 3).

That said, there are a lot of pro-life Christians out there, and while I don't think the achieve 3), logical inconsistency is not a great flaw, and many of them are better people than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC