Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does the 'McNabb Flu' story change your view of the Super Bowl?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: Does the 'McNabb Flu' story change your view of the Super Bowl?
Reports have surfaced that describe Donovan McNabb as having been really sick in the huddle towards the end of the game. One report has Freddy Mitchell calling a play because McNabb couldn't really speak, and another report has McNabb dry-heaving in the huddle.

A lot of people are bagging on McNabb for the turnovers in the game, despite the fact that he put up 300+ passing yards. Does the flu story change your perspective on the game and the way it came out?

My perspective, fwiw: Tom Brady had a 103 degree fever the night before the Steelers playoff game, and went out and won. In the days before the Super Bowl, his grandmother died and his father was hospitalized for what may have been a heart attack, and he went out and won. So...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. It changes nothing. Why did they not use a no-huddle offense when they
were down by 10 with 5 minutes left? Unacceptable and the blame lies with the offensive coordinating staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly!
I am an Eagles fan, but I was jumping up and down when at 5 minutes they seemed to care nothing about the clock!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. Yeah
My wife and I were watching it and kind of looking at each other saying "What the hell are they doing?" and we weren't even really invested in the game.

I can't imagine what I would have been saying if I was an Eagles fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not really....
If he had won, it would have added to his feat alah Brady and his Pittsburgh flu.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. ummmm for 4 million a season
I'd go out there naked in Green Bay and play. Hell I don't like him but TO played with a not-fully-healed foot. I don't like excuses, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hey AndyP
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 05:51 PM by Calico Jack Rackham
that Novak sig is funny as shit. Haven't seen that one since Jon Stewart called him that. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. No excuse....
As a Packer fan, I have a nice example. After Brett's dad died Christmas of 2003, he had one of the greatest performances of any quarterback ever.
I think McNabb is overrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Overrated? Thank you, Rush
Favre won one Super Bowl and lost one. McNabb has plenty of time to match or exceed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:37 PM
Original message
I take offence at that
I'm hardly Rush. Many people think that he is overrated. Not because of his skin color, but because he didn't even look like he could hit the broad side of a barn on Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. At least he got there
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 06:44 PM by lancdem
That's more than most QBs can say. Overrated quarterbacks don't throw for 356 yards in the Super Bowl against a team with a great defense. Hardly an example of "not hitting the broad side of a barn."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. That is true
and he had some amazing passes into coverage. Maybe I was over exaggerating about him being over rated. If it were the Packers in the Eagles position, I would be pissed if someone said something like that about Favre. It's not fair of me to judge someone that I've paid very little attention to for most of the season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. Huh?
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 12:05 PM by ProfessorGAC
He completed 60% of his throws, had 3 TD passes, and couldn't hit the broadside of a barn?

He, without TO, gets to 4 straight NFC championships, and he's overrated?

There's seems to be a lapse in logic here.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. THIS is the way it IS in football
When the game starts, you play the best you can with the best team you can field. When it is over, it's over. Whoever won, won. There is no whining about who had bruises and injuries or the sniffles, and who could not play, or play at their "best." The Patriots had their share of injuries and illnesses, too. That's the nature of the game.

You just have to do your best, and then go on. McNabb and the Eagles played beautifully in the Super Bowl. I salute them. The Patriots played better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
41. You go into the game with the team you have...
...not the team you want. :-) Wait -- have I heard that somewhere before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. What about the other 10 lolly-gaggers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. NO..It's up to the people that run the team..
(including the Quarterback) to have the resources to compete in any game.
If you only have one decent Quarterback than that's YOUR problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. See Chicago Bears!
I read your post and thought immediately of the braintrust of my Bears who went to battle with Grossman as starter, but Quinn and Krenzel as reserves. Grossman hurts knee; season over! Dumbasses!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Look, his team is the second best this year
I don't think he has anything to apologize for, but I won't cut him any slack for having the flu either. He did his best, his team gave it a good effort, a valiant one, in fact, and made it a nailbiter of a game.....but the best team won.

Making it to the show IS an acomplishment, even if you come in second. His team is better than all of the others, save one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's why it's called "pro" sports...
TO played against doc's orders, fer cryin' out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hmm, in the same game where Mr. Owens and his broken ankle shined?
I think not. What Owens did was truly remarkable; it just wasn't enough to overcome mediocre play elsewhere.

McNabb played inconsistently from the beginning; the big hit he took didn't seem to alter his play much at all.

The Patriots find ways to win the big games. Every big game.

The Eagles, however, find ways to lose them.

They had plenty of opportunities to win it, barf or no barf. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, sick or not we still beat ourselves anyway you look at it.
It should have been 21-0 in the first quarter on the way to a romp but D-Mac's extremely uncharacteristic poor throws killed them. Even with 4 turnovers they still only lost by 3. This game was ours for the taking regardless of how sick Donovan was. We beat ourselves. That's the most disappointing thing. It sucks when you should win but do not. We'll be back next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sick in the huddle towards the end of the game? Excuse? Ha!
Reminds me of the way Kurt Warner always came off the field after throwing a pick shaking his throwing hand and staring down at it like it alone had betrayed him (same as my brother does when he bowls a gutter ball :eyes: ).
T.O. played a hell of a game on a pieced-together ankle, yet McNabb can't run, throw, or even speak because of a poo-poo tummy?
He's a better man than that...is that coming from McNabb himself or Freddy (Mitch the Mouth) Mitchell, AKA Freddy One-Catch?
The Iggles will be back...they don't need to be making up pissy little alibis like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. McNabb would never make excuses
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 06:22 PM by lancdem
I heard Hank Fraley mentioned this problem on talk radio. McNabb's no whiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I didn't think so...dude's tough.
He was hiding his nerves well too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. He is very tough
He just didn't bring his A game. Part of that is attributable to the Patriots, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Now that he's got the feeling of the biggest of the big games
he'll be that much tougher.
Now if they could just do something about Mitchell's mouth...
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I'm pretty sure Mitchell won't be with the team next year
Not because of his mouth, but because of his lack of production. Maybe he'll become some other team's problem. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not one bit. The Eagles choked again!
Yay, Pats!:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Bullshit
You lose by 3 points to a team favored by 7.5, and you call it choking? I'll bet you thought the Pats were going to blow the Eagles out. Practically everyone believed the Eagles had no chance, and they proved them wrong. I'm proud of how they played, but they should've won, flu or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. They did stand up well against the Pats,
certainly better than many expected, but "they should've won"? How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Well, let's see ...
The first-half interception in the red zone cost them at least 3 points; the L.J. Smith fumble in Pats' territory cost them 3 points, probably; and the second-half interception in Pats' territory cost them a field goal at least, too.

If you have four turnovers (three in the other team's end of the field), the other team has one, and you lose by 3 points, you should've won. It's a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. And...
The pats fumbled on the 2 yard line... so? Was it your expectation that the Eagles should never turn the ball over? If they do turn it over, does this have nothing to do with the defense? McNabb made some bad throws, granted, but the turnovers only have 2 explanations. Either the Pats forced them OR the Eagles made mistakes. If the Pats forced the turnovers then they deserved them. If the Eagles made mistakes, is it somehow not their fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. I thought the final score would be 27-21
I had the Eagles with the points but the Eagles outplayed the Pats and still lost. They blew it. Choked. Call it whatever you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. The game is over. Who cares? Bring on baseball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I think it's 9 days til pitchers and catchers report
WHooohoooooo!!! Bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. No
It does excuse his play somewhat, but their clock management was still awful at the end. They could have easily had several plays in reserve, and had someone like Mitchell, TO, or Westbrook call them in advance. Like you said, Brady also had a lot to deal with, and still managed to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. No
You play the game with the players you have. If McNabb wasn't healthy enough to be out there calling plays, then he shouldn't have been out there. If the Eagles don't have a sufficient backup, then that is their decision not to spend the $$ in that area and hope that you won't need to use one. If they used the money they spent on Owens on a quality backup instead, they may not have been in this position, but that was a trade-off they were willing to make last off season. I'm not willing to concede that, "if healthy", McNabb would have made the plays he needed to make. On the other hand, I have a lot more respect for TO (as a football player anyway) than I did before the game. He "put up", as opposed to Mitchell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Nobody has a quality backup QB
Could the Pats have won with Rohan Davey? Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Did the pats have a quality backup 3 years ago,
When Bledsoe got hurt 2 games into the season? Or the Giants in the early 90's when Hostetler played for Simms in the Superbowl? They don't need to have Payton Manning on the bench, but they did play their backups in the last few games of the season, and they both looked awful. Most backups fit into 1 of 2 categories... They are either 1) experienced veterans (Blake & Detmer) who have been around a while, and while they're not "starting material" they should be able to step and and competently run an offense or 2) Development projects (Davey), a rookie or younger guy who isn't ready for starting duties, but shows some promise.

If McNabb was in such bad shape that he couldn't run the hurry up offense when they clearly needed to, they should have put in a backup. If the backups weren't capable of running the offense, then that is a coaching problem (for not preparing them) or a management problem for not getting the better personnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I think McNabb was capable of running the team
BTW, Brady had already played almost a whole season before making it to the Super Bowl. I meant rarely, not never. I should know better than to say never. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I believe that he was capable of running the team too...
I'm not sure why they didn't run the hurry-up, but I'll bet that wasn't McNabb's call. I'm just saying that if he wasn't able to run the hurry up, and they wanted to, then he shouldn't have been in the game. As to why they didn't run it, I'm sure a lot of Eagles fans are asking that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
36. Michael Wilbon says that McNabb may have had a bloody mouth
I posted this over in the Lounge . . .

Exerpt from yesterday's "Chat House", Mike's Monday afternoon online chat:

Silver Spring, Md.: Re: McNabb
Thanks for taking my question. I think I heard you mention on Tony's show (plug alert!) that Donovan McNabb was hit in first half and this may have affected him later. Can you elaborate? I don't remember any particular 'hit' but he seemed eratic and the clock management was mysterious.

I remember thinking that Philly should have him do a couple planned runs just to get him loosened up. I know the Pat's defense was excellent but he seemed out of sorts. Was he hurt?

Michael Wilbon: He had a bloody mouth and kept rubbing his chin. I'm not saying for sure he has one...I'm wondering. He was so not alert with the game on the line. And after the game he was rubbing his chin, which is so uncharacteristic of Donovan. He played really poorly in what should have been a no-huddle situation. Donovan, despite his stats, had only a "C" game in my opinion, which is too bad because I love him and because he had a shot at leading his team past the Super Bowl...
**********************************************************************
LOL . . . here's a question about the behavior of Eagles fans at the Super Bowl:

Arlington, Va.: Were the Philly fans really booing their team in the 4th quarter?

Michael Wilbon: 'Cause they're Phllly fans and they'd boo their own mamas. They booed Michael Irvin when he could have been paralyzed on the turf at The Vet. They can be so disgusting.
**********************************************************************

Link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64457-20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. It was Richard Seymour who laid that lick on McNabb
Perhaps TO wasn't the only guy to come back from a bad injury and make a serious impact on the game after all.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf_Moderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
39. Both teams played their hearts out, and the Pats won.
McNabb juat had some turnover issues. I initially rooted for the Pats, but Terrell Owens impressed me during the game. It was altogether good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
40. Drew Bledsoe, meet Tom Brady. Mr. McNabb.....
fuck that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC