Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone really know when jesus was born??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:50 AM
Original message
Does anyone really know when jesus was born??
Not to make a fuss, but I have found nothing that tells me jesus was born
on Dec. 25th. According to Wikipedia, noone is even sure what year he was born.

When was Jesus born?

Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz write, "There is no certain indication of the precise year of his birth. Certainly Matthew and Luke agree in attesting that Jesus was born in the lifetime of Herod the Great (Matt. 2.1ff.; Luke 1.5), i.e. according to Josephus (Antt. 17, 167, 213; BJ 2, 10) before the spring of 4 BCE. This terminus ante quem is certainly probable, but there is some dispute over it, as doubts about the reliability of the chronological information in both the Matthean and Lukan infancy narratives is justified." (The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide, Fortress Press: Minneapolis, 1998: page 153)

Luke 2:1 connects the birth of Jesus to the census of Quirinius, which took place in 6 CE according to Josephus (Wars of the Jews 2.117f., 7.253; Antiquities 17.355, 18.1ff.). Schürer regards this as a chronological error in Luke.

Some have attempted to make a more precise determination of Jesus' birthdate by correlating the magi's star (Matthew 2:2) with astronomical phenomena; however, Matthew 2 describes a miraculous travelling star, which does not fit into known astronomical categories, and such theories have commanded no wide assent.

It would appear that the christers hyjacked perfectly good Pagan holidays and renamed them christmas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone really know if Jesus WAS born? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dunno
But that's certainly and angel pictured in your sig line! Sweet doggie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thank you so much...
That's my little heart dog, Jordi, 1988 - 2004. He was about the sweetest doggie that ever lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. All dogs are angels
Angels that live with us and then angels that we remember. I'm sure Jordi gave as much as he got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. He gave even more.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. I'll bet he smelled so GOOD
he just looks like he has that warm doggie shampoo smell. mmmmm

I know you miss him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Yep. I sure do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. No
There is no historical account of his birth or death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. nope, facts don't matter when it comes to religion...
just belief and faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here we go again, TG. Some seem unaware that some Christians...
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 11:00 AM by DeepModem Mom
or should I have said "Christers," have HEARD about pre-Christian mid-winter festivals dating back ages and ages and ages. I mean, that we actually have that much intelligence, and knowledge of history --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If I had to pick a time of the year to celebrate a birth
I would choose the quietness of the solstice. The solstice is a natural event. It didn't belong to the Pagans, alwhough I understand they had some cool parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Beautiful post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. It seems to matter to the christers
If you were born on Oct. 3rd would you celebrate your birthday on Dec 25th.??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I am not a "Christer" any more than a Jew is a "Hebe"...
or a Muslim is a "Towelhead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. I don't think
any Christians believe December 25th is the actual birthdate of Christ. There is absolutely no way of knowing. I was taught as a child in church that nobody knows. We do know the crucifixion because of its relationship to Passover, which is based on the moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScooterKen Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Link inside, explains everything (click)
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 11:03 AM by ScooterKen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Thanks for the link, what a blessing no matter what date nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. good link man
I'll check that out further later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Not a definitive year, let alone a definitive date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Yes, wasn't there some hanky-panky with the calendar
back during Gregory that messed it all up? I actually have very little idea what I am talking about. Maybe someone can figure it out.

Of course, Herod also plays a part in Christ's death? Was that the same king? Or his son? Or Herod the Lesser or something like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
62. I was just scrolling through the list of questions and opened the
one asking "is circumsicion required?"

The skeptics annotated bible puts quotes side by side saying yes and no making it appear like there's a contradiction. If anyone's interested, let me nip this controversy off as painlessly as possible.

Circumcision is part of the contract God made with Abraham. It is required of Jews as God's chosen people. The quotes from the skeptics annotated bible requiring it are naturally from Genesis.

Skip forward a few thousand years.

Jesus has been crucified and risen to heaven. The disciples have spread out among the Middle East gaining followers to the teachings of Christ. They send letters back to Jeruselum and also go back themselves to report on their activities.

There is a recurring problem that is reported.

Many, many Gentiles are becomming "God Fearing Men,"that is men who follow the teachings of Jesus, but many fewer are willing to convert and follow Mosaic Law. So what was so tough about Mosaic Law that would keep people from accepting it by the thousands? Circumcision, that's what.

So, the question was asked over and over. How much of Mosaic Law must a Gentile follow to be a follower of Christ?

Surprisingly, or not surprisingly the question was answered by calling a forml meeting on the subject. Elders and disciples from all over the Middle East were called to Jeruselum and a formal "Council of Jeruselum" was held to address the question.

After much debate and prayer, the Council made its announcement in writing which was spread throughout their world.

This is from Act 15:28-29...

"It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things."

Bam. The edict of the Council of Jeruselum is most important for what it doesn't say. It doesn't say a believer must be circumsized.

This edict led to an incredibly fast growth in the church, and it also signaled the break between what is a Jew and what is a Christian. With this written position you now have two separate religions.
_____________________________________________________________________

This is basic Bible 101. The fact that the skeptics bible presents this as a contradiction shows either complete ignorance of the subject they are addressing or a determination to mislead their readers.

Either way, there's not much sense in opening any more of their questions as they are either ignorant or willing to mislead.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. Okay, I want to be a Christian, but I have to do WHAT??????
Ummmm... no, sorry, not interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. You are right: The old holidays were hijacked by christers
Death by assimilation. Fertility festivals become Easter. Winter Solstice celebration becomes Christ's Mass.

However, Jesus was not born. He was the amalgam of many messianic figures that roved the countryside at the time. That's why you don't have a reference to him by anybody outside the circle of believers; no secular historian mentions Jesus of the NT. (Josephus does, but scholars acknowledge it was a later addition by an unknown hand.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. If we are to call Christians "Christers," can we call Jews "Hebes,"
and Muslims "Towelheads"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. If you must
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. I don't use those terms. Why do you use "Christer"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. Actually it was christer (small c )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Okay, I'm out of this toxic, hateful thread. Have at it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. As a former christer, I can say it
And what would be wrong with saying "Goder" or "Mohammeder"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #36
51. Nothing wrong with it as far as I am concerned
except they are not words in the English language and therefore not grammatically correct. Yet. Maybe you started something. Language is a living thing, always evolving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. What's with the Christer stuff? That's a new one on me
But I guess in our language the "er" and the "ian" are interchangeable.

But you are so fortunate to have an inside track on the real truth. "Jesus was not born. He was the amalgam of many messianic figures..."

It would be great to have that level of certainty about things so long ago! Wow. Awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Yeah, a masters degree from seminary tends to do that to you (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. You mean if I go to seminary and get a Master's
I'll learn the Truth?

I'm been searching for the Truth for so long, and it's THERE all along?

Which seminary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth
Your mileage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. LOL on the mileage! I'll bet!
I'm thinking a Baptist seminary would be concerned that you left there with the firm knowledge/belief that there were "many" messiahs.

Since the Baptists are usually into that whole "one messiah" concept.

At least the ones around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Which Jesus?
If it was a popular name 2000 years ago, I imagine there were as many Jesuses back then as there are now. I know a cousin and a neighbor named Jesus. ¡Órale vato! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Whiskey Priest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. Gosh...I am still working on..
If?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. Jesus?
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 11:08 AM by tridim


8 year olds Dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
60. Nobody fucks with the Jesus
What a great character. There are rumors that the Cohen brothers are going to do a movie about Jesus pre-Big L.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
24. You act as if this is some fantastic new discovery, when
it has been common knowledge among educated religious people for centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. What common knowledge are you refering to??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. What she says, "common knowledge." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. It was once common knowledge that the earth was flat, and also
that the earth was the center of the universe.

Is that the "common Knowledge" you speak of??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. You are denying that the existence of pre-Christian mid-winter...
observances is unknown to every Christian on earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. That Jesus had to have been born "B.C." because Herod died in
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 11:27 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
4 B.C. and that the date of Christmas was arbitrarily chosen to replace Saturnalia.

That's the common knowledge I was referring to. I learned it in my Lutheran confirmation class at age 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I'm presuming there is an unawareness here that there ARE educated....
religious people. Once again, we have the ignorance that equates all of religion with the extremists, the fundamentalists, and the nuts, and confirmed atheists as the only enlightened beings among us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. Nice Christian-bashing thread (NOTE: Not Fundie-bashing). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Not my intent to bash. Just a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. A question that by DU rules belongs in the Religion and Theology forum.
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 11:20 AM by DeepModem Mom
A question that has nothing to do with politics, or the destructive power of the "religious" Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. This is general discusion. My intent was to start a discussion.
It worked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
42. I wasn't really addressing your OP, which is why I used
the more general reference to "thread", although I do wonder about the "christer" reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. Oh, please
That's as thick as your skin is? You call this a Christian-bashing thread because someone used the term "christer." And it gets compared to Hebe? Wow. I hesitate to think what would happen if Xians weren't the dominant religion in our country. Just think how much you would be bashed then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Why do you assume I am a Christian?
I am an Atheist. Do you assume that all Atheists must be anti-Christian? You're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. My apologies for an incorrect assumption.
I assumed you were Christian because you so quickly jumped on something that doesn't seem to be that big of a deal. It seemed like a reaction from someone taking offense at something they thought was aimed at them. Again, my apologies.

Do you assume that because someone uses the term "christer" that they are anti-Christian? You are wrong. I don't see how that is anti-christian. "Fucking dumbass christer" Now that would be a different story, but that is not what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScooterKen Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
28. It would appear that the christers hyjacked perfectly good Pagan holidays
"It would appear that the christers hyjacked perfectly good Pagan holidays and renamed them christmas."

Yes.

Of course.

They did it on purpose. Duh.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
50. Those Pagans
wow...they owned the Soltice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #50
72. It's not about owning the solstice
it's about being assimilated and then, all these years later, having "Jesus is the reason for the season" thrown repeatedly in your face. :eyes:

If Xtianity as a whole (not just the educated, kind members) would acknowledge that Jesus wasn't born Dec. 25th and that other holidays celebrated at that time pre-date him anyway, maybe non-xtians could actually enjoy this time of year again.

I personally could not care less when a religion wants to celebrate the birth of their figurehead. I care that I am told I am defiling their time of year when my celebrations are actually older.

I just want to add, TallahasseeGrannie that I normally find your posts thoughtful, sensitive, and illuminating (if not enlightening) but the digs at pagans "owning" solstice were condescending at the very least. Did you mean for them to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. Most un-biased Biblical scholars put the date somewhere between
6BC and 3AD, and generally have the original birthdate as being in the early spring, generally March, due to the fact that it is March when lambs were born(which were mentioned in the gospels).

The date was moved back to Dec. 25 by early Christians in order to make their new found religion more palatable to those who worshiped Sol Invictus and Mithras, who both had holy days on Dec 25.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. So there you have it.
JC not born in Dec.

So why should we only think of christ on Dec. 25th??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #46
52. If you are a Christian
you think of Christ every day. But you commemorate special events in his life throughout the year. It is called the Seasons of the liturgical year and it provides a framework for some Christians and their spiritual life. For example, right now, Advent, some Christians use the time to prepare for the coming of Christ into their lives. Of course, this ia a metaphor. It is done through fasting, special prayer and ritual. In my family we light an Advent wreath and say traditional prayers. There is also traditional music. One in particular I love is by Bach, entitled "Break Forth of Beauteous Heavenly Light" and it is from his Christmas Oratorio.

So celebrating Christmas on the 25th is kind of like celebrating Thanksgiving or Labor Day. No particular reason for the actual date, other than you pick a date to commemorate. Same with Mother's Day, etc.

Same with the Orange Bowl. (Where the Seminoles will bash Penn State)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. I, for one, am glad they chose December
because face it, it's a bummer month otherwise.

I never thought of the lamb connection! But that is sure correct, because I raise goats and the kids are born anywhere from Feb to May. A young sheep would no longer be a lamb by December.

Now here is a question. Does it ever snow in Bethlehem?? I always wondered. My favorite Christmas Carol is:



In the bleak midwinter, frosty wind made moan,
Earth stood hard as iron, water like a stone;
Snow had fallen, snow on snow, snow on snow,
In the bleak midwinter, long ago.

Our God, Heaven cannot hold Him, nor earth sustain;
Heaven and earth shall flee away when He comes to reign.
In the bleak midwinter a stable place sufficed
The Lord God Almighty, Jesus Christ.

Enough for Him, Whom cherubim, worship night and day,
Breastful of milk, and a mangerful of hay;
Enough for Him, Whom angels fall before,
The ox and ass and camel which adore.

Angels and archangels may have gathered there,
Cherubim and seraphim thronged the air;
But His mother only, in her maiden bliss,
Worshipped the beloved with a kiss.

What can I give Him, poor as I am?
If I were a shepherd, I would bring a lamb;
If I were a Wise Man, I would do my part;
Yet what I can I give Him: give my heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. I had always heard Jesus
was a Pisces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
56. Until the bureaucratically-inspired change by Constantine in the
fifth century c.e.,Jesus' birthday was celebrated by early Christians (or is it Christers?)on January 6. The savvy Emperor
consolidated the birthday of Jeebus, and the Pagan celebration of the Return of Sol Invictus on Dec. 25th, to only have one
'State-sponsored' holiday, thus appeasing two of the largest factions of his widely-varied Empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Ah! So THAT's where the 12 Days of Christmas came in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #57
64. Not quite.
Major feasts in the kalendar are extended over a number of days, in most cases (e.g. the Assumption of Our Lady) this is a simple week (called an octave) - however the Christmas season went on for longer. 6 January is the feast of the Epiphany (arrival of the 3 Magi), and that now closes the Christmas celebrations. In former times Christmas went on until 2 February (Purification of Our Lady and Presentation of Christ in the Temple).

This is made a tad more confusing because most Orthodox churches keep Christmas by the Julian calendar rather than the Gregorian which thus puts 25th December on what we think of as 7 January - as the celebrations begin on the evening before (hang over from Judaism) they're just starting Christmas as we end it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. Good to see this placed in the right forum
It is an interesting thread.

TG (Christer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
65. No they don't, and it would only be of scholarly interest as well.
We don't know when Our Lady was assumed - but we happily celebrate that on 15 August. We don't know when she was born - but the feast of her Nativity is 8 September. We've got no idea when St. John the Baptist was born or died - but both are given liturgical commemoration. So too Ss. Peter and Paul - tradition holds that they were martyred on the same day, but it probably was not 29 June where it is now commemorated.

I know of nobody sane who has ever pretended that 25 December was the actual literal date of Christ's birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bloodblister Bob Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
67. Jesus, Easter Bunny, and Tooth Fairy born on same day. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
69. Generally conceded to be
in the spring of BC 04

Baseed largely on what is known abouth the Roman census
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
70. It is impossible to say
Pick any three time markers associated with Jesus' birth (the reign of Caesar Augustus, the governorship of Quirinius in Syria, the kingship of Herod the Great, an imperial census in Palestine, the season when flocks were out in the fields rather than safe in barns close to home, a celestial event of sufficient magnitude and length that a caravan of astrologers, presumably from Persia, had time to travel to Jerusalem) and you find a disjoin. Out of the six time markers, you will find that no three of them coincide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handsignals4theblind Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
71. - It will shock you to know--SEpt 11th-3BC was Jesus birth
--


You don't expect me to elaborate and write on that one do you?

There is evidence to indicate as such but it is the work of an obsessive of the Occult------PM me if you want to hear his files of that show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC