Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A baby's life on the line unless hospital's petition trumps parents religious beliefs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:07 PM
Original message
A baby's life on the line unless hospital's petition trumps parents religious beliefs
Parents, hospital at odds over baby's care

Jehovah's Witnesses' beliefs prohibit blood transfusions, which doctors say she needs.


A baby's life may hinge on whether a hospital's petition trumps the religious beliefs of her parents.

A petition filed by Dupont Hospital on Thursday in Allen Superior Court asked the court to order blood transfusions if they are necessary for “Baby Girl Binns,” who is anemic and was born prematurely May 14, at about 25 weeks into her mother's pregnancy.

According to court documents, the baby is in the neonatal intensive care unit and will need at least one blood transfusion and possibly more.

The petition says the mother, Stephanie C. Binns, and her husband, Pierre Binns, who are both Jehovah's Witnesses, are placing their daughter at risk by refusing transfusions based on their religious beliefs.

LINK


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, they do not believe in transfusions. it's sad that a baby could die because her parents
don't want her to receive a blood transfusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has anybody asked the baby what her religious belief are?
After all, she is not necessarily a Jehovah's Witness. She could be a Scientologist.

If the parents want to refuse treatment for themselves, fine. But they are custodians, not owners, of their baby. Their religious beliefs are not hers until she adopts them.

I've always been just a little pissed that my folks made an assumption about my feelings on circumcision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And, since she is too young to make such a decision,
and the state has an overwhelming responsibility in preserving citizens' lives, I say force the blood transfusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Jehovah's Witness baby gets blood substitute
Edited on Sat May-30-09 08:10 AM by moobu2
In a compromise designed to accommodate the beliefs of a Jehovah's Witness couple, Dupont Hospital will use a blood substitute on the couple's anemic baby while reserving the right to transfuse blood to save the baby girl's life, if necessary.

An Allen Superior Court order that the hospital requested last week to transfuse blood for the premature baby if needed was approved at a family court hearing, according to Lynn Vann, the minister for Pierre and Stephanie C. Binns, the parents of the baby girl born May 14.

The Binnses couldn't be reached for comment Wednesday, but on Tuesday, Stephanie Binns said she and her husband were following biblical passages forbidding ingesting blood. Genesis 9:4 of the Jehovah's Witnesses New World Translation of the Bible on its Web site says, “Only flesh with its soul — its blood — YOU must not eat.”


<snip>

“The right to practice religion freely does not include the liberty to expose the community or child to communicable disease, or the latter to ill health or death,” Judge Wiley B. Rutledge wrote in the majority opinion. “Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves, but it does not follow they are free, in identical circumstances, to make martyrs of their children before they have reached the age of full and legal discretion.”


LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC