Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faithist Memes, Religious Privilege, Victimization, and Bad Arguments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 07:45 PM
Original message
Faithist Memes, Religious Privilege, Victimization, and Bad Arguments
Edited on Sun May-17-09 07:49 PM by Ian David
Faithist Memes, Religious Privilege, Victimization, and Bad Arguments

Lately, I have had a couple in-depth conversations with friends of mine who are believers about belief in God. To their credit, the debates were mature, without so much of the self-victimization and underhanded straw men that believers often use. But, some were still evident, so I thought I’d write about some of the faithist memes and myths that have been quite prevalent in society lately and my thoughts on them. These are all “points” that are used to defend and protect religious beliefs. (For the record, YES, these are generalizations, and if you don’t subscribe to the meme, then I’m not talking about you, and if you do, then YES, I am!)

“It’s true because I believe it.” – The “Truth” Meme.

This might sound like a simple everyday understanding, but it’s definitely a faithist meme. It’s a suspension of reality. It’s saying, “It doesn’t matter what else is true, this will always be true because I choose to call it truth.” Yeah, I said choose. Belief is a choice. You choose what you believe, and by the power of this meme, you get to choose your truth. You see it used as a defense over every social issue. Fundamentalists say they know what traditional marriage is (even though marriage has changed many times over its history), they know when life begins (even though there is no actual way of objectively determining such a thing), etc. But they don’t know, there is no truth or fact, they just believe.

More:
http://zackfordblogs.com/2009/05/17/faithist-memes-religious-privilege-victimization-and-bad-arguments/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. "I believe in hell. therefore, you are going there if you don't believe". hmmm nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not sure that "meme" is the right word for these. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humblebum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Which makes them very human, just like you.
The idea that truths are absolute is indeed relative to the thinker and believer. That is an absolute truth (unless,of course you have a different opinion).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There are absolute truths. Given that reality is more or less the way we experience it
Edited on Tue May-19-09 02:04 PM by Strong Atheist
(as opposed to being a brain in a jar/Matrix/ Cartesian demon tricking us), then there are truths. The Earth is more or less spherical, not flat, and if one "choses" to believe the Earth is flat, one is a ****ing idiot...

2+2 = 4, not 5 or any other number.

The list of such physical time/space relationship /math truths is vast, and not subject to subjective belief...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good example of the "stalemate meme".
That's what you intended, right? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humblebum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I suppose that's a way of looking at it. I was really being sarcastic about
the idea of relative truths in that determining a relative truth requires referring to an absolute truth as a point of reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The concept of (although not the possession of) objective truth...
...is a necessary and inherent component of meaningful communication. If you engage in communication with others and treat that communication as something more than an internal fantasy with figments of your imagination (which, I suppose, is your right to do -- solipsism can't be disproved), and if you treat that communication as having at least some hope of reaching shared consensus, you need the concept of objective truth -- truths and meanings which are not private, not completely subject to personal interpretation, which "out there" in an independent way, equally accessible to you and those with whom you communicate, touchstones of common understanding.

Although the two concepts are pretty much interchangeable, I prefer the terminology "objective truth" to "absolute truth" because the word objective better brings to mind the related concept of subjectivity, and also because the word "absolute" can be misleading in that it often invokes the idea of an inflexible claim of knowledge of an absolute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humblebum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What are you doing talking to me? I'm not really here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Of course not. You're THERE.
I'm HERE. Don't be silly. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Damn. Now I'm talking to myself.
Edited on Wed May-20-09 12:02 PM by Silent3
Or, at least, responding to the wrong message. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC