|
Dear Senator:
I urge you to join Representatives John Conyers, Jr., Jerrold Nadler, Robert Wexler, and others in Congress, by demanding an investigation into the possible election fraud that took place on November 2nd. Further, should widespread election anomalies be proven beyond a doubt, Senators must band together and support those in Congress in contesting the results. Certainly, as a politician, you realize that our system of voting is the basis of our democratic society, and ensures that you will be elected to office if you run a good campaign and the people vote for you. Even the mere fact that doubts have now arisen as to the validity of the election on November 2nd warrants a federal investigation to ensure that our democratic system has not been compromised. Particularly with regard to Diebold’s Optiscan machines, the results vary widely from data about voter registration, expected results, AND exit polls. Paired with the fact that both Diebold and ES&S (the companies that supply most of the country’s voting machines) are strongly partisan, the questionable results demand a much closer look at the integrity of the election. Diebold has written and admitted to a documented letter to President Bush to assure him that the company would “deliver” Ohio to him, and has documented accounts of encouraging election officials to utilize holes in software security. Their software has been proven repeatedly to be easily hacked into. The voters have NO paper trail to validate their votes. We therefore, can only rely on you, our official voice in government, to act on our behalf and ensure the integrity of our democratic process.
Please ask yourself if you are willing to accept ALL of the following points without further investigation: To believe that Bush won the election, you must also believe that the exit polls were wrong; that Zogby's 5pm election day calls for Kerry winning Ohio and Florida were wrong (he was exactly right in his 2000 final poll); that Harris' last-minute polling for Kerry was wrong (he was exactly right in his 2000 final poll); that incumbent rule #1 - undecideds break for the challenger - was wrong; That the 50% rule - an incumbent doesn't do better than his final polling - was wrong; That the approval rating rule - an incumbent with less than 50% approval will most likely lose the election - was wrong; that it was just a coincidence that the exit polls were correct where there was a paper trail and incorrect (+5% for Bush) where there was no paper trail; that the surge in new young voters had no positive effect for Kerry; that Kerry did worse than Gore against an opponent who lost the support of scores of Republican newspapers who were for Bush in 2000; that voting machines made by Republicans with no paper trail and with no software publication, which have been proven by thousands of computer scientists to be vulnerable in scores of ways, were not tampered with in this election.
If you have any doubts, please fight for us, the people who trust you to act for the people in government. Force this issue to light and demand that our votes be verified for accuracy. And if widespread election fraud is proven beyond a doubt as a result, contest the election. We can’t do it without you, and it is your job to serve us as our voice. After all, if this problem isn't immediately addressed, next time, it could be your own seat which is stolen.
Sincerely,
Voter
|