Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "shift" from 2000 in 2004 (based on alleged "results")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
TennisGuy2004 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:49 AM
Original message
The "shift" from 2000 in 2004 (based on alleged "results")
It's true that Bush's numbers went up in almost every state, but in many of those states, Kerry outpaced him. The key is to compare the rate at which Bush's percentage changed from 2000 with the rate at which Kerry's percentage changed from Gore's in 2000.

Of the states in which there was a Bush shift, the most notable are
as follows:

Alabama - shift = 10.78%
Tennessee - shift = 10.46%
New Jersey - shift = 9.63%
Hawaii - shift = 9.59%
Oklahoma - shift = 9.28%
Rhode Island - shift = 8.41%
New York - shift = 7.71%
Connecticut - shift = 7.17%
Louisiana - shift = 6.93%
West Virginia - shift = 6.47%
Indiana - shift = 5.27%
Florida - shift = 5.25%
Georgia - shift = 4.97%


Nearly all of the states with the biggest Bush shifts have one of two things in common: 1) They are very close in proximity to the 9/11 attacks or 2) They are Southern states, where Kerry's appeal (not to mention his campaign) was limited.

There were less pronounced Bush shifts in the following states:
Arizona, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, and Utah

The states showing a Kerry shift tend to be more modest. Of these, the notable ones are as follows:

Vermont - shift = 10.33%
Montana - shift = 4.54%
Alaska - shift = 4.15%
DC - shift = 3.88%
Oregon - shift = 3.49%
Maine - shift = 2.91%

There were also modest Kerry gains in states like New Hampshire and Colorado.

Most of the other states didn't really change that much from 2000 to 2004. These include the all-important battleground states of Ohio, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Nevada, and Iowa.

Non-battleground states that didn't change much are North Dakota, South Dakota, California, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Wyoming.

Therefore, given this detailed analysis of the "9/11 states," the "Southern Slam Dunks for Bush," and the states where Kerry gained, it is still perfectly valid to believe there is a pattern of mistabulation and/or fraud with respect to some of the key battleground states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nice work
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC