Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

93,000 extra votes in Cuyahoga County

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:30 PM
Original message
93,000 extra votes in Cuyahoga County
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDog2u Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ohio Vote Count experts on DU....

Are these numbers correct? Is there any wiggle room? Please, those of you have who extensive experience --- and I know you are here, for you've been feeding us stats like crazy -- what is *your* reaction to this? Is this the straw that will break the Camel Blackwell's scheming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. No this is not true.
Someone posted it below, but essentially the absentee votes for multi-precinct races are all dumped in to one precinct by the software used. The detailed, by precinct, data does exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That argument doesn't wash
If absentee ballots are counted separately, there should be LESS votes showing in a precinct, not MORE!

Here's an egregious example:

REGISTERED VOTERS, ORANGE CSD: 11640
BALLOTS CAST, ORANGE CSD: 22931

DIFFERENCE: 11291 MORE votes cast than registered voters.

What does this have to do with absentee ballots?

If there were 100% turn out with 10% voting absentee, the ballots cast would be 10476, while the difference (1164) would have been lumped in the absentee total.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. It isn't an 'argument' it is a fact.
There are lots of precincts not in the list that is linked. The absentee votes from those precincts have been added to the vote totals of the ones that are.
Why is there suddenly a bunch of people posting this long resolved issue tonight? Is this an effort to discredit those claiming vote fraud by including this bad info? to make them look like fools?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Absentee ballots are listed separately on the site.
There are 80624 of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xpat Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. I followed the logic of this explanation.
With your explanation in mind, I threw out all the sub-districts (WD1, DST1, CSD, LSD, etc.)

After the clean-up, these are the election districts that remain:
BAY VILLAGE
BEACHWOOD
BEDFORD
BEDFORD HEIGHTS
BENTLEYVILLE VIL
BEREA
BRATENAHL VIL
BRECKSVILLE
BROADVIEW HEIGHTS
BROOK PARK
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN HEIGHTS VIL
CHAGRIN FALLS TWP
CHAGRIN FALLS VIL
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS
CUYAHOGA HEIGHTS VIL
EAST CLEVELAND
EUCLID
FAIRVIEW PARK
GARFIELD HEIGHTS
GATES MILLS VIL
GLENWILLOW VIL
HIGHLAND HEIGHTS
HIGHLAND HILLS VIL
HUNTING VALLEY VIL
INDEPENDENCE
LAKEWOOD
LINNDALE
LYNDHURST
MAPLE HEIGHTS
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS
MAYFIELD VIL
MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS
MORELAND HILLS VIL
NEWBURGH HEIGHTS VIL
NORTH OLMSTED
NORTH RANDALL VIL
NORTH ROYALTON
OAKWOOD VIL
OLMSTED FALLS
OLMSTED TWP
ORANGE VIL
PARMA
PARMA HEIGHTS
PEPPER PIKE
RICHMOND HEIGHTS
ROCKY RIVER
SEVEN HILLS
SHAKER HEIGHTS
SOLON
SOUTH EUCLID
STRONGSVILLE
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS
VALLEY VIEW VIL
WALTON HILLS VIL
WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS
WESTLAKE
WOODMERE VIL


Then, I eliminated all that had more ballots that registered voters. By you explanation, these are precincts and their results should be accumulated at a higher level. Then, I added the total of ballots cast at the remaining higher level election districts. This figure should be the total number of ballots cast (665334). Guess what. The total number of votes for the higher level districts is only 604430. Where are the 61,000 other votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Paul Begala
is telling Democrats to get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDog2u Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danostuporstar Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is...
old and debunked unfortunately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not True
From the Cuyahoga Elections Board website:

Explanation of Ballots Cast Totals on this page and the Summary Report
In even-numbered years, the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections tallies absentee ballots by Congressional, House, and Senate district combinations. Because of this, the ballots cast totals for municipalities on this web page and on the summary report needs to be derived by using the following technique: For municipalities with wards, find the ballots cast total for each ward and total them. For municipalities without wards, please refer to the contest of interest on the canvass report. Absentee ballots cast totals appear separately at the end of each contest on the canvass report. If you have any questions, please contact the Board of Election’s Ballot Department Manager at (216) 443-6454.


There are not more votes than voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDog2u Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thank You
Edited on Wed Nov-17-04 05:41 PM by BlueDog2u
For the clarification.

I was suspicious that it would be that easy to prove anything this big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. "explanation"?
I read that the elections officer's explanation of these discrepancies is that the "ballots cast" indicates an overlap of senate and congressional districts. It is something to take into account and question. ??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think these numbers have been "debunked" by OH
...but I don't really buy their explanation, which is the provisional and absentee ballots were accidentally lumped in with other counties, etc.

Still sounds fishy to me. And ironically, by some figures I've seen, 93,000 is almost the exact number Kerry would need.

Again, the jury is out on this one still, so no hopes up or down. I'm sure if we know about it, so do others who are investigating. On the other hand though, we should keep things like this in mind.

ABC is one of the debunkers for this however, so keep that in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solitaire Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. thank you, I must have been typing while you were posting :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solitaire Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. ??
is this true or not, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyn2 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Outdated info
Article is from 11-12-04.
I believe this is the one that KO talked about. This county has different counting methods on odd numbered years and even numbered years. And they add in absentee some weird way.

I'm not positive, but I think this is the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Anyone know the rationale of counting differently in odd and even years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobbes199 Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Probably just miswording
They probably meant that it would only manifest in even numbered years. Probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Please go look at this page:
Edited on Wed Nov-17-04 05:50 PM by msgadget
http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us//BOE/results/currentresults1.htm#0531 and in the dropdown that says, 'Select a Contest', choose President and Vice President. This is what it said when I looked (and printed it out!) :



PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT
Vote for 1 (With 1458 of 1458 precincts counted)
MICHAEL BADNARIK/RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA 1828 0.28%

GEORGE W. BUSH/DICK CHENEY 215624 33.05%

JOHN F. KERRY/JOHN EDWARDS 433262 66.41%

CANDIDATE DISQUALIFIED 0 0.00%

MICHAEL A. PEROUTKA/CHUCK BALDWIN 1667 0.26%

Edit: I just read some of the previous posts and the site, which explained the weird odd/even way of counting. Still, if the other person won, wouldn't his totals still be higher than his oppent's? I have no hopes, just curious.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. No...it's outdated info...they corrected it. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks so much,
for answering. If they corrected it, is it public yet? Before now I thought tabulating votes to be a very straightforward task - guess not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaBecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Re-Count should settle our uneasiness over their explanation
I looking for them to find a big stack of "you know what" over in a dark corner somewhere.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyp Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think I can take much more of this
Hope - despair - hope - despair ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC