Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Few errors found in N.H. recount that Kucinich sought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:05 PM
Original message
Few errors found in N.H. recount that Kucinich sought
http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2008/01/few_errors_found_in_nh_recount.html
Posted by Sabrina Eaton January 22, 2008 11:14AM

The recount of Democratic primary votes in New Hampshire that Cleveland's Dennis Kucinich requested hasn't changed any candidate's voting percentage "by more than a few hundredths of a percentage point so far," the Nashua Telegraph newspaper reports today.

Kucinich paid $27,000 to recount about 40 percent of New Hampshire's Democratic ballots after Hillary Clinton polled disproportionately well in machine-counted parts of the state. According to the Telegraph, the partial vote count Kucinich paid for may be finished this week, after which he'll decide whether to pay approximately $40,000 more to recount the rest of the state's Democratic votes.

When the Democratic recount wraps up, Republican primary ballots will be recounted at the request of a little-known GOP candidate from Michigan, Albert Howard, who got just 44 votes.


"The hand recount seem to support local officials' confidence in AccuVote scanners, which tally the election-night votes from the paper ballots at most area precincts," the newspaper reported. "But they may not placate the concern of those who worry about the 'chain of custody' -- the security of the cardboard boxes that hold ballots between the time that polls close and the time that recounts start."


...The newspaper opined that Kucinich's recount "will answer some questions and put to rest some of the conspiracy theories being circulated. OK, it won't end all the conspiracy theories. Some people are impervious to facts. But it will show whether the 'irregularities' Kucinich and others think they have found are real."




The recount is worthless, all of these attempts are just for show. Where was the chain of custody controls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Kucinich chose the wrong battle
I'm just not sure why he did this. I certainly don't believe in the integrity of voting machines, but New Hampshire wasn't experiencing the problems that contribute to the major errors (long lines, old machines, not enough machines, huge inner city precincts that knocked voters off the rolls, etc.) He should have just donated that 27K to a voting rights organization. I really question his judgement on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Some people are impervious to facts"?- custody chain needs improvement - and random audits should
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 02:13 PM by papau
be mandatory as in the Holt bill -

but The recount of 40% of the vote was not worthless - IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gee THE OTHER GUYS candidates are strangely silent aren't they
after screaming bloody murder that Hillary fixed the vote...gee sour grapes all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC