Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BradBlog: EXCLUSIVE FL-13 UPDATE: ES&S Moves to Strike U.S. House Admin Committee Letter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:11 AM
Original message
BradBlog: EXCLUSIVE FL-13 UPDATE: ES&S Moves to Strike U.S. House Admin Committee Letter
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 01:16 AM by Wilms

EXCLUSIVE FL-13 UPDATE: ES&S Moves to Strike U.S. House Admin Committee Letter

Voting Machine Company Claims Chairwoman's Missive 'An Attempt to Intimate, Unduly Influence' Court

Plaintiff Attorney Says Claim is 'Remarkable', 'Takes a Lot of Chutzpah'


BY Brad

1/9/2007

Describing it as a "threat...intended to interfere with the independence of the judiciary" in Florida's 13th Congressional District election contest, one of the defendants in the case, Elections Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S), has filed a motion to strike a letter sent last week to Florida's appellate court from the Chair of the U.S. House Administration Committee, The BRAD BLOG has learned.

snip

In today's motion , obtained this afternoon by The BRAD BLOG, ES&S demands the court strike Millender-McDonald's letter from the record. They claim that it's an "unauthorized, non-party response" and that her letter was a "thinly veiled attempt...to intimidate this Court and unduly influence its deliberations in order to give Petitioner (Jennings), a member of Millender-McDonald's political party, an unwarranted advantage in this election contest."

That, despite the fact that Jennings has challenged the election in the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act and that a letter , similarly from the U.S. House Administration Committee --- then under Republican rule --- sent to a California court was instrumental and cited by the Judge in the dismissal of a contested U.S. House Special Election last summer between Brian Bilbray (R) and Francine Busby (D) in California's 50th district.

snip/links to documents

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4008


And congrats to Brad, et. al. for 4000 (and 8) reports.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. 4000 (and 8)???

Yeesh. Wish you hadn't made me notice. But thanks for the kudos. Clearly, me needs a nap.

As well, looks like I was posting today's alert elsewhere on DU with this story as well at the same moment you posted this. Hope I'm not in trouble. Again.

The other post, however, includes a bunch of bonus stories. Including one heckuva new dot in the EAC/Ciber Labs story first popped by NYTimes last week.

Thanks again, Wilms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. link to other post? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Geez Louise!
There's just no end to the shit-baggery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I second the Emotion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Now this is an interesting development.
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 02:03 AM by btmlndfrmr
...Looks like somebody's getting a little nervous. Jeepers*, you think this is a stalling tactic?

K&R


Edited to add: If they didn't want focus, they sure got it now.




*Green Bay Wisc. exclamation of excitement.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. "ES&S claims government should stay out of elections."
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ES&S is a private company...
what's the matter bleever? Are you anti-privacy?

What, are you a Commie or sompthin'? :rofl::rofl:

Conversely--and in reality--ES&S is more of a pirate company and we are more of the anti-piracy sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yea, the Goverment should stay out of elections , Yea, Yea,
thats the Ticket!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Proprietary rights vs. voting rights
From the above link:

...Circuit Court Judge William L. Gary held in his decision at that time that the proprietary "trade secrets" of ES&S took precedence over Florida voters' right to know what actually occurred in their own U.S. House election....

Shiiiiiiit! by that measure ANY AND ALL investigations into business practices could be halted.

"When property rights violate human rights, human rights prevail--Abraham Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Local story link here. ES&S is starting to sweat a bit more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC