Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm Getting Pissed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:37 PM
Original message
I'm Getting Pissed
Vote Fraud Theories, Spread by Blogs, Are Quickly Buried
Electronic voting machines, like these at a polling place in West Palm Beach, Fla., are at the center of Internet rumors about election fraud.
Mario Tama/Getty Images
Electronic voting machines, like these at a polling place in West Palm Beach, Fla., are at the center of Internet rumors about election fraud.

By TOM ZELLER Jr.

Published: November 12, 2004

The e-mail messages and Web postings had all the twitchy cloak-and-dagger thrust of a Hollywood blockbuster. "Evidence mounts that the vote may have been hacked," trumpeted a headline on the Web site CommonDreams.org. "Fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines," declared BlackBoxVoting.org.

In the space of seven days, an online market of dark ideas surrounding last week's presidential election took root and multiplied.

But while the widely read universe of Web logs was often blamed for the swift propagation of faulty analyses, the blogosphere, as it has come to be known, spread the rumors so fast that experts were soon able to debunk them, rather than allowing them to linger and feed conspiracy theories. Within days of the first rumors of a stolen election, in fact, the most popular theories were being proved wrong - though many were still reluctant to let them go.

Much of the controversy, called Votergate 2004 by some, involved real voting anomalies in Florida and Ohio, the two states on which victory hinged. But ground zero in the online rumor mill, it seems, was Utah.


more
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/12/politics/12theory.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=bef1453564cd6e4e&hp&ex=1100322000&partner=homepage

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, Tom can blow his mouth after the recounts. If he's proven correct,
well, I guess we'll have to accept it. If it proves fraud, then, Tom, STFU!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. The last place I'd go for the scoop
would be the snotty New York Times! What arrogant bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Doesn't anybody care
that democracy is going in the toilet. They say we are wearing tinfoil hats, well democratic and moderate republican politicians are going to be wearing political caskets if this crap keeps up. Don't these people see that? Talk about the frog in the cool water and slowly turning up the heat syndrome, we are at a near boiling to death and these people are giving the Reich Wing the matches to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know!
I keep wondering how blanant this has to get before people start storming the castle. However, I don't think I want to know the answer, because I have a feeling we'll all just sit here until the tanks roll into town and we have guns pointed in our faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TangledThorns Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Reality Check
I hope some here realize that no other paper disliked Bush more than the NYT. I think articles like this is a hint that we're looking a little paranoid and crazy here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hi TangledThorns!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The NYT was B*sh's biggest flag-waver, especially about phantom WMD
So, no, they don't "dislike" Junior. Not at all. So, you might want to watch who you're calling "paranoid and crazy." Although I'm sure you know people who use those words to describe DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Corporate media is threatened by the internet
Look how much loaded language there is in this "news" story. I have seen op eds with less slant. Can one reporter, two reporters and an editor, a whole staff even, out research, out fact check or otherwise out report thousands of bloggers? Of course not.

Behind this dismissive article, I hear the death rattle of major media.


In place of investigative journalism we now get this junk -- dis-info-tainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Call or e-mail the NYT and let them know what you think.
News media need to understand that THEIR CREDIBILITY IS ON THE LINE in how they handle these allegations. We won't be satisfied with "move along folks there is nothing to see here" journalism.

Why would a government adopt a flawed voting system that can not be made either secure or verifiable? If they don't think this is a serious issue, a serious question, then it is obvious to anyone that THEY are serving to cover up and misdirect public attention away from this matter.

Let them know how you see this issue:



* LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
E-mail to letters@nytimes.com.

* OP-ED/EDITORIAL

For information on Op-Ed submissions, call (212) 556-1831 or send article to oped@nytimes.com. To write to the editorial page editor, send to editorial@nytimes.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

* NEWS DEPARTMENT

To send comments and suggestions (about news coverage only) or to report errors that call for correction, e-mail nytnews@nytimes.com or leave a message at 1-888-NYT-NEWS.

The Editors
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com

The Newsroom
news-tips@nytimes.com; the-arts@nytimes.com
bizday@nytimes.com; foreign@nytimes.com
metro@nytimes.com; national@nytimes.com
sports@nytimes.com; washington@nytimes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheNonPanderer Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree
I agree and I was going to post something on this.

Bloggers suddenly are suspect but was Powerline Blog suspect when they said the Bush Memo from CBS was suspect?

Why are bloggers less credential than Reporters?
Don't Believe the Hype as Public Enemy says

and Dems need to get right to those machines that are CORPORATIZED. You got bamboozled


(sorry this is my first reply... Im not a freeper. I just have never been here before. Thats kind of funny I knew about Free Republic rather than Democratic Underground )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Welcome aboard!
No doubt the internet is a threat to MSM. The days of filering/selective reporting/spinning the news from the top/down are over.

The reason I like DU is we get a wide variety of news instantly reported here.....it's like having 30,000 stringers on board. Once posted, we have lots of people that can debunk/affirm/debate the content. I really think this is the model of the future.

MSM has their own agenda....and it is not necessarilly inclusive of ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Welcome TNP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Hi TheNonPanderer!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC