Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: The Big Gamble on Electronic Voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:16 PM
Original message
NYT: The Big Gamble on Electronic Voting
The Big Gamble on Electronic Voting
By RANDALL STROSS
Published: September 24, 2006


Illustration by The New York Times

....From 2003 to 2005, some $3 billion flew out of the federal purse for equipment purchases. Nothing said “state of the art” like a paperless voting machine that electronically records and tallies votes with the tap of a touch screen. Election Data Services, a political consulting firm that specializes in redistricting, estimates that about 40 percent of registered voters will use an electronic machine in the coming elections.

One brand of machine leads in market share by a sizable margin: the AccuVote, made by Diebold Election Systems. Two weeks ago, however, Diebold suffered one of the worst kinds of public embarrassment for a company that began in 1859 by making safes and vaults.

Edward W. Felten, a professor of computer science at Princeton, and his student collaborators conducted a demonstration with an AccuVote TS and noticed that the key to the machine’s memory card slot appeared to be similar to one that a staff member had at home.

When he brought the key into the office and tried it, the door protecting the AccuVote’s memory card slot swung open obligingly. Upon examination, the key turned out to be a standard industrial part used in simple locks for office furniture, computer cases, jukeboxes — and hotel minibars.

Once the memory card slot was accessible, how difficult would it be to introduce malicious software that could manipulate vote tallies? That is one of the questions that Professor Felten and two of his students, Ariel J. Feldman and J. Alex Haldeman, have been investigating....Even before the researchers had made the serendipitous discovery about the minibar key, they had released a devastating critique of the AccuVote’s security. For computer scientists, they supplied a technical paper; for the general public, they prepared an accompanying video. Their short answer to the question of the practicality of vote theft with the AccuVote: easily accomplished....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/yourmoney/24digi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. about time-but so far to go KICK nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Keep your eye on the prize, NYT got permission to run this story
conveniently a month before the election, People, the NYT and the Government is still allowing our votes to be counted in secret, and this article will not prevent them from doing it.

We need to stay on message, SECRET VOTE COUNTING, Why is NYT first finding out about this, just one month before an election? We knew about this for 2 years.

Princeton, has to tell the NYT what the story is? Doesn't the NYT have any GODDAMN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST? They have to rely on Princeton University to GET THE FACTS for them, Where are their Investigative JOURNALIST?

THEIR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST wouldn't have had to go to far to find the story, We have been talking about this for years. What a GODAMN bunch of SCARED COWARDS the NYT is.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. THEIR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST wouldn't have had
You Said: THEIR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST wouldn't have had to go to far to find the story, We have been talking about this for years. What a GODAMN bunch of SCARED COWARDS the NYT is.

No, not far at all.

Just step out the air lock of the NYTime Vault, and the story would have fallen on his Goddamned pointy head!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. We also haVe a bunch of sissies at the DU, running cover for these secret
vote counting machines, WHO COULD THEY BE? SCREW THEM TO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Perhaps not sissies. Jus Goddamned infiltrators (see below)
I saw a friend of mine write a beautiful essay last night about her mother's disenfranchisement in Missouri. In response, she was attacked savagely and called a liar.

I wandered past, by chance, and thought :wtf:?

I read, jumped in, defended, posted, even posted most of the MO SoS web site. Still, after about 300 posts, these bastards were claiming this was not GOP Election Theft tactics and Voter Suppression.

So today I popped back to ERD, saw "WillYour"'s post about HR 4844, posted, and asked for advice, (referring to the thread of last night).


Question was basically this:

1)Are these posters infiltrators from Camp Rove???

or

2)Is DU just filled with closet racists and xenophobes?

or

3)Are these people so fucking stupid they can't understand something repeated to them about a million times? And, if the latter, then they were (IMHO) too fucking stupid to vote anyway.



I went on an errand, came back in 90 minutes, and "WillYour" had the infiltrators asses against the wall and had emailed Skinner.

These troll bastards are as thick in DU as McCarthy thought the Reds were in the State Departmart. So I weighed in, with others, and we kicked their asses!


So, I think you probably have infiltrators rather than pantywaists. Particularly since it's about the particular subject above.

Seems "Will"'s thread, and Proud's (of last night), both covered the same subject: Voter ID. One was state, one was federal, #4844.


Long story short is this.

Somebody (a bald, pudgy m**********r who looks like Porky Pig and works at the White House) is scared to death of something. As for myself, I'm sure it is the fear of Brad's "LAVA" act and then HCPBs FOREVER!:woohoo:

So, if these asshole sissies you speak of start that waffling crap, turn up the heat until and torture the living shite out of them, both logically and verbally.


We found tonight, and last, that these evil fuckers can't stand the light. So strobe them until the the infiltrators roll belly up and die. Then scrape their sorry asses off DU and compost them.

Horseshit has always been good for composting!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. OK, infiltrators, I'll go with that, lets watch them, as they bow
to the SECRET VOTE COUNTING MACHINES, for their masters, bunch of
Damn infiltrators. An eight year old would know better than to defend SECRET VOTE COUNTING MACHINES IN A CONTEST OR ELECTION, but these pieces of shit defend it over and over again.

Not only that, these same infiltrators or pieces of shit, will run stories about, voter suppresion and voter ID's, just to distract us from the real issue, the SECRET VOTE COUNTING MACHINES. We got their number!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC