Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Criminal Complaint Filed with Coshocton County (Ohio) Prosecutor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:31 AM
Original message
Criminal Complaint Filed with Coshocton County (Ohio) Prosecutor
Edited on Wed Sep-20-06 08:02 AM by eomer
Tim Kettler, Green Party candidate for Ohio Secretary of State, has filed a complaint with the Coshocton County Prosecutor, alleging criminal acts in the 2004 Presidential election and recount.

It appears from his quoted comments that the County Prosecutor is not likely to take any action, but I still think it is important that this news be known.


Tim Kettler's complaint to the Coshocton County Prosecutor (note to mods: I believe this letter of complaint to a County Prosecutor is a public document so I have included it in full.)

August 16, 2006

Robert Batchelor
Coshocton County Prosecuting Attorney
318 Chestnut St.
Coshocton, Ohio 43812

Mr. Batchelor,

This complaint filed this day, August 16, 2006 is a full and accurate accounting of events resulting from my first hand knowledge and direct involvement in the 2004 Presidential Vote Recount.
All allegations of misconduct are corroborated in public records, transcripts and correspondence between the Coshocton County Board of Elections and me.
Due to your role as counsel for the Coshocton County Board of Elections, it is appropriate that a special prosecutor be named to investigate this matter immediately and that you neither begin an investigation nor serve as counsel for those named in this complaint. The appointment of a special prosecutor in matters concerning members and employees of county boards of election represented by the office of the County Prosecutor was reaffirmed by the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor with the appointment of Special Prosecutor Kevin Baxter of Erie County to investigate similar allegations filed against members and employees of the Cuyahoga County Board of Election, with subsequent indictments then issued in April, 2006 against three employees of the Cuyahoga County Board of Election due to that investigation.
It is also necessary that the presiding court immediately move to issue an order to preserve all documents pertinent to the General Election of November 2, 2004 and the 2004 Presidential Vote Recount in Coshocton County. This order should include all records at the Coshocton County Board of Election as well as the Office of The Ohio Secretary of State and any and all relevant records that may be stored elsewhere.
Although only those actions and events that transpired as verifiable acts of misconduct are addressed in this complaint, it is important to note the intent of the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director of the Coshocton County Board of Election and the Deputy Director of the Coshocton County Board of Election to misrepresent the outcome of the General Election of November 2, 2004 as well as their intent to violate not only the “Outline of Recount Procedures” as directed by the Secretary of State, but the spirit of the Recount as well. In statements to the media by the Director intended to cover up the failure of tabulating equipment on Election Day, as well as official record documenting the Board’s intent to ignore the Secretary of State’s Directive requiring random selection of precincts to be recounted it is apparent that there was a sense among the Board and it’s employees that they need not comply with the law.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you would like to discuss this complaint further.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter,

Timothy J. Kettler

August 16, 2006

This document is my personal account of events that occurred prior to, during and subsequent to the official Presidential Vote Recount of the 2004 General Election in Coshocton County, Ohio, November 2, 2004. These events are a direct result of the actions of the Coshocton County Board of Election including members David Burns, Donald K. Andrews, Mary Fritz, and Kenneth Grewe and herein referred to as the Coshocton County Board of Election, Mary Fry, Director, Coshocton County Board of Election, herein referred to as the Director, Kathy Hendricks, Deputy Director, Coshocton County Board of Election, herein referred to as the Deputy Director, Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ms. Patricia Wolfe, Mr. Michael Hernon and Ms. Kathy Malot of the Ohio Secretary of State’s Office and other possible unknown and unnamed persons.

The Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy Director willfully violated Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell’s Directive No. 2004-58, which included an “Outline for Recount Procedures” (Ohio Revised Code sections 3515.01 – 3515.07) which states, “at the time and place fixed for making a recount, the county
Board of Election, in the presence of all witnesses who may be in attendance, shall open the sealed containers containing the ballots to be recounted, and shall recount them.”

On December 8, 2004, the Coshocton County Board of Election scheduled the Presidential Vote Recount to be conducted December 14, 2004. On December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, with no prior notification to the candidates and no candidates’ witnesses present, an illegal recount of the Presidential Vote Election Returns certified by the Ohio Secretary of State on December 6, 2004, was conducted by the Deputy Director. This deliberate, illegal action was the result of a decision made on December 9, 2004 after consultation with and at the direction of, the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and Mr. Michael Hernon and Ms. Patricia Wolfe and possible other unnamed and unknown persons. The Election Returns resulting from this illegal recount were then certified by Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell on December 10, 2004 as the official totals of the Presidential vote of the 2004 General Election held November 2, 2004.

On December 14, 2004, the official Presidential Vote Recount of the 2004 General Election in Coshocton County was held. As the candidates’ witnesses assembled in the public access area of the Board of Election, prior to being admitted to the recount area, the ballots to be recounted were removed from their unsecured storage boxes and distributed randomly among the various tables to be recounted by the ten counting teams. At no time were the ballots stored in sealed containers, and handling and distribution of the ballots occurred on this date as well as on December 8, 2004 or December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, and other possible dates without the presence of the candidates’ witnesses. When the candidates’ witnesses were granted access to the recount area it was noted that ballots were already handled and distributed, blank ballots were in view among the haphazardly placed cardboard boxes in which the ballots were stored. Some of the boxes were taped shut with typical packaging tape. During the time candidates’ witnesses were waiting in the public access area, volunteers assembled to form counting teams and other volunteers and board members distributed ballots and handled boxes of ballots.

As the recount began, the Director and Deputy Director distributed copies of precinct by precinct Election Returns of the Presidential Vote of the 2004 General Election. These Election Returns distributed to the candidates’ witnesses were the Election Returns obtained by the illegal recount conducted on December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, rather than the Elections Returns certified by Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell on December 6, 2004, the Official Election Returns determined by the Secretary of State to be the Election Returns to be recounted. At no time did the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director or Deputy Director inform the candidates’ witnesses of the origin of the Election Returns presented to them, nor were these totals posted by the Coshocton County Board of Election or the Secretary of State for the general public prior to the recount. These totals were represented by the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and Deputy Director as the official Election Returns of the Presidential Vote of the 2004 General Election, November 2, 2004. Upon further examination and analysis subsequent to the completion of the recount held on December 14, 2004, inconsistencies were noted between Official Election Returns as certified by the Secretary of State on December 6, 2004 and those Election Returns supplied to candidates’ witnesses on December 14, 2004 and represented as the Official Election Returns of the General Election, November 2, 2004. On December 19, 2004 I submitted a letter to the Coshocton County Board of Election inquiring into the true circumstances of the events found to be inconsistent with the requirements of the Ohio Revised Code section 3515.04. In a follow up telephone conversation with the Director I was informed that a reply to my letter would be forthcoming after the Board of Election met and drafted an official response. I subsequently received the Board of Election’s official reply, dated December 27, 2004, which detailed the aforementioned events of December 9, 2004, December 10, 2004 and December 14, 2004.

ORC 3599.16, “Misconduct of Members of the Board of Election”, states that, “No member, director or employee of a board of election shall: A) Willfully or negligently violate or neglect to perform any duty imposed upon him by law, or willfully perform or neglect to perform it in a way as to hinder the objects of the law, or willfully disobey any law incumbent upon him to do so.” The Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy Director, with the full knowledge of and possibly at the direction of Mr. Michael Hernon and Ms. Patricia Wolfe, and other possible unnamed and unknown persons, violated ORC 3515.04 “Outline of Recount Procedures.” By willfully conducting, concealing and misrepresenting the illegal recount of the Presidential Vote of the 2004 General Election on December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy Director violated ORC 3599.16. This action also violates ORC 3515 “Outline of Recount Procedures, D2, Notice to Candidates.” and referred to in ORC 3599.32, “Violations by election official not otherwise specified.”

On December 10, 2004, the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy Director, with the full knowledge of Ohio Secretary of State J, Kenneth Blackwell, Mr. Michael Hernon, Ms. Patricia Wolfe, Ms. Kathy Malot and other possible unknown and unnamed persons violated ORC 3599.29, “Possession of False Records.”, which states, “No person shall have in the person’s possession a falsely made, altered, forged or counterfeited registration card, form or list, poll book, tally sheet or list of election returns of an election, knowing it to be such with intent to hinder, defeat, or prevent a fair expression of the popular will at such election.” On December 10, 2004, false Election Returns generated due to the illegal recounting of Election Returns occurring on December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, were submitted to the Ohio Secretary of State for certification and subsequent submission to the Electoral College. These Election Returns were obtained due to the commission of an illegal act and cannot be construed as legal or certifiable. The only true, legal Election Returns of the Presidential Vote of the General Election of 2004 in Coshocton County are the Official Returns as certified by the Secretary of State on December 6, 2004 and the Official Certified Election Returns resulting from the Presidential Vote Recount of the General Election of 2004, occurring on December 14, 2004.

On December 14, 2004, the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy supplied Election Returns in a document titled “Precinct Totals by Race Report” to candidates’ witnesses. These Election Returns were represented as the official Election Returns of the Presidential vote of the General Election, November 2, 2004. These election returns were in fact the “amended official” referred to in the official Board of Election minutes of December 9, 2004, and generated by the illegal handling and recounting of Election Returns on December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004. This action constitutes a violation of ORC 3599.29, “Possession of False Records.”

On December 9, 2004 or December 10, 2004, and again on December 14, 2004, the Coshocton County Board of Election, the Director and the Deputy Director, violated ORC 3515.04 which states in part, “…the county Board of Election, in the presence of all witnesses who may be in attendance, shall open the sealed containers containing the ballots to be recounted, and recount them.” The handling and recounting of the ballots not in the presence of the candidates’ witnesses is a violation of ORC 3599.16, “Misconduct of Members of the Board of Election.” The failure to store ballots in “sealed containers”, as required by ORC 3515.04, is referred to in ORC 3599.32, “ violations by election official not otherwise specified.”, which states, “No official upon whom a duty is imposed by an election law for the violation of which there is no other penalty otherwise provided shall knowingly disobey such election law. Whoever violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.”

The events of December 9, 2004 and December 10, 2004, specifically the illegal recount of the Presidential vote of the General Election of 2004, and failure to notify candidate no later than five days prior to a recount are corroborated in a letter (exhibit A) to me from the Director dated December 27, 2004 and written at the direction of the Coshocton County Board of Election. Additional corroboration is contained in the official minutes of an emergency special meeting of the Coshocton County Board of Election (exhibit B), held December 9, 2004.

The events of December 10, 2004, specifically the possession of false election returns for submission to the Office of the Secretary of State for recertification and subsequent submission to the Electoral College are also corroborated in the above mentioned letter (exhibit A)

The events of December 9, 2004 or December10, 2004, and again on December 14, 2004, specifically the handling and distribution of the ballots to be recounted, not in the presence of the candidates’ witnesses are corroborated in both exhibit A and exhibit B.

The events of December 14, 2004, specifically the possession and distribution of false Election Returns to candidates’ witnesses is corroborated in the document “Precinct Totals by Race Report” “Official-November 2, 2004” dated 12/10/2004 10:25:28 AM
(Exhibit C)

Failure to store ballots in “sealed containers” is acknowledged in exhibit A in the description of security procedures and corroborated by eyewitnesses including myself.

In the interim period of December 19, 2004 to December 28, 2004 the Coshocton County Board of Election held a Board meeting via telephone conference call to discuss official Board business. The purpose of that business being to discuss the draft response to be prepared by the Director at the direction of the Coshocton County Board of Election to answer questions submitted by me in a letter dated December 19, 2004. (Exhibit D) In a conversation with the Director on September 15, 2005, I was informed that a request to the Board of Election for comment on the draft response was made by the Director via fax on December 21, 2004 and December 28, 2004. Copies of the fax cover letters were supplied to me during the September conversation and are included here (exhibit E). Copies of the letter submitted by me (exhibit D) were also supplied to me at that time. During the September 15, 2005 conversation the Director informed me that a Board of Election meeting was then held via telephone conference call. The copies (2) (exhibit F) of the letter(exhibit D) and supplied to me on September 15, 2005 by the Director contain penciled in notes made by the Director during the Board Meeting conducted via conference call. As of September 15, 2005 there are no recorded minutes of this official business or of any official business relevant to my letter (exhibit D) or the draft response (exhibit A). This is a violation of ORC 3501.13, “Duties of director, oath; notice posted.” which states in part “…the director of the board of elections shall keep a full and true record of the proceedings of the board.” This is also a violation of ORC 3599.32, “Violations by election officials not otherwise specified.” As of September 15, 2005 there are copies and originals of the documents mentioned in this paragraph maintained in a file at the Coshocton County Board of Election under the heading “Timothy J. Kettler”.

As Prosecutor for the County of Coshocton, I ask for your immediate attention to this matter.
Thank You,
Timothy J. Kettler

http://www.sostim06.com/complaint.html



Coshocton Tribune article of August 18, 2006 with the County Prosecutor's comments (in bold):

Complaint filed against local Board of Elections office
Staff Reports

WARSAW - Tim Kettler, local Green Party candidate for Secretary of State, submitted a complaint with the Coshocton County Sheriff’s Office and the Coshocton County Prosecutor alleging misconduct during the 2004 Presidential Vote Recount.

According to Kettler, those named in the complaint include the directors and members of the Coshocton County Board of Election, as well as Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell and at least three of his employees. He said the complaint also demands the appointment of a special prosecutor and a court order to preserve documents.

Kettler claims the Republicans and Democrats presently in control of the local election process have failed to conduct elections with transparency and integrity. “We’ve had similar complaints about the Board of Elections (from the general public) ... they may not be factually similar but when private citizens complain they usually do it outside of the time frame of the law,” said County Prosecutor Bob Batchelor. “(Kettler) is about 18 months too late if he wants to contest the results of the General Election of 2004.”

-snip-

“Due to the increase in absentee voting, there is increased use of optical scan tabulating equipment to count those votes. This type of equipment, the same type used in Coshocton County for the 2004 General Election, has a long track record of unreliability and resulted in over 6 percent of the 2004 Presidential Vote in Coshocton County going uncounted on Election Day,” Kettler said in the statement.

Batchelor said it’s doubtful any legal remedy could be obtained through his office.

Originally published August 18, 2006
The Coshocton Tribune
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[No direct link available. Here is a link to a page that contains the full text of the article.]




Tim Kettler's reply as a guest column published on August 24, 2006:

Board of Election acted illegally
By TIM KETTLER
Guest Columnist

Prosecutor Robert Batchelor's response to the complaint I filed against members of the Coshocton County Board of Election and Secretary of State Ken Blackwell implies that I am attempting legal action to change the outcome of the last presidential race. Nowhere in the document is there mention of a challenge to the 2004 election. Those words are Mr. Batchelor's and he has his own motives for portraying the complaint in that light.

The filing is a criminal complaint resulting from the events surrounding the presidential recount of 2004 and the actions taken by the board of election. The facts show that more than 6 percent of the 2004 Presidential vote in Coshocton County went uncounted on election day. Factual evidence also shows that the board of election intended to violate the procedures for random selection of precincts to be recounted, handled and recounted ballots without witnesses present and without proper five-day notification to the candidates, that they recounted ballots and altered the certified totals of the election when they discovered the failure of the tabulating equipment and presented these altered vote totals to the candidates witnesses as the official count of the general election of Nov. 2, 2004, totals that may be deemed false election returns. These and other events of interest occurred prior to the official recount conducted Dec. 14, 2004, when ballots were improperly stored and again handled without the presence of candidates' witnesses.


It is my opinion that the members and directors of the Coshocton County Board of Election willfully violated election law set forth in the Ohio Revised Code and that these violations may be prosecutable as both misdemeanors and felonies. The questions before the prosecutor concerning the complaint are: One - Did these events in fact occur?; Two - Are the actions taken by those named in the complaint in conflict with the provisions of the law; Three - Is the complaint filed within the timeline provided by the law? If the answers to these questions are yes, it is the prosecutor's duty as representative of the people of Coshocton County to take appropriate action.

As for the "legal remedy" Mr. Batchelor referred to; participation in Ohio elections is abysmally low, due in part to the lack of confidence in the honesty and integrity of those conducting them, and the diminishing transparency of the system itself. Encouraging and empowering full citizen participation is essential to our democracy and accountability on all levels is vital to that effort. The Cuyahoga County prosecutor in a recent case involving the board of election removed himself in the interests of fairness and the appointed special prosecutor then issued indictments for similar violations as those alleged in the Coshocton complaint. I urge Mr. Batchelor to do the same.
Ohioans should be aware that these are not isolated events. Several county boards of election throughout Ohio acted illegally to deny a full and complete accounting of the election. It is my intention to fight for the public's right to fair, honest and transparent elections.


Tim Kettler is the Green Party Candidate for Secretary of State.

Originally published August 24, 2006
Coshocton Tribune

http://coshoctontribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060824/OPINION02/608240318/1014/OPINION


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick and Nom. May all of the Criminals be prosecuted.
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Blackwell, Halliburton, KBR. The list could go on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. The consequences of that stolen 2004 election
will afflict America for generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's past time to hold Blackwell & his cronies responsible for breaking
the law.

For those DUers who trash the Green Party....it was the Green Party who organized the recount and fought for the Dem base voters (greens only received 198 votes in 2004) in Ohio in 2004. Since OH law says only candidates can contest an election, and knowing Blackwell is in charge of Ohio's 2006 election, and that Dem candidates have not been willing to sign "no concession until outcomes are clear', it is important for Green Party candidates to run. WE CAN NOT ALLOW ANY MORE STOLEN ELECTIONS!

For the few of you out there who still have doubts who one in '04, please listen to Mike Papantonio (attorney who won the huge settlement against the powerfuul tobacco industry):

http://www.bradblog.com/Audio/MikeMalloy_MikePapantonio_071206.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R for Transparent Democracy nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. EXACTLY...
“(Kettler) is about 18 months too late if he wants to contest the results of the General Election of 2004.”

Would someone please tell these guys that it isn't about contesting the results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC