Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missouri Voter Photo ID law struck down !!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:21 PM
Original message
Missouri Voter Photo ID law struck down !!
:party: :applause: :woohoo: :party:

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2006/09/11/daily55.html?from_rss=1

If the machines can't cheat Claire McCaskill unseats Christian Taliban member, Senator James (no)Talent!!! :toast:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. GO MO! GO MO! GO MO!
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

DEMOCRACY WINS!

:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. hurrah! a victory for democracy and basic human decency!
thanks for posting galloglas!
Judge strikes down Missouri voter ID law
KELLY WIESE
Associated Press
The Kansas City Star
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/15519955.htm
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - A state judge struck down Missouri's new voter identification law Thursday as an unconstitutional infringement on the right to vote.

Cole County Circuit Judge Richard Callahan was considering two combined lawsuits claiming the requirement that people show a federal or Missouri-issued photo ID at the polls starting in November was an unconstitutional burden on voters.

Callahan's ruling bars the photo ID requirement from being enforced. He said the requirement is a particular burden to women and the poor. That's because a separate Missouri law requires those getting or renewing a driver's license to show they are lawfully in the country, generally with a birth certificate or passport.

Those whose name has changed, such as some married women, also must provide documents showing those changes. While the ID to vote would be free, underlying paperwork has a cost, and the judge said that's unacceptable.

Without the added requirements to obtain a license or state ID card, the judge ruled, the law might not be so burdensome.

"While a license to drive may be just that: a license and not a right. The right to vote is also just that: a right and not a license," the judge wrote.
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/15519955.htm

"However, for the elderly, the poor, the under-educated, or otherwise disadvantaged, the burden can be great if not insurmountable, and it is those very people outside the mainstream of society who are the least equipped to bear the costs or navigate the many bureaucracies necessary to obtain the required documentation," the judge wrote in his ruling.

That is at least 260,000 registered voters in Missouri.
Thank you, Judge Callahan!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R!
:bounce: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great news
This is great news. I just had to get my drivers license renewed, and it was a real pain - though luckily my birth certificate was just in my parents safe deposit box. You need that plus one other proof that you are a resident or Missouri, - for example, a utility bill.

I just thought how many people are going to go to the trouble to get an official copy in order to vote - that is if they can even get one.

Meg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go MO!
And kudos to the judge who upheld the constitution!
:applause:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Woo Hoo! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R galloglas!!
Thanks for posting this fabulous news!!

Now we just have to come out in BIG numbers and watch the polls/machines with cameras and camcorders in hand!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-15-06 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good to hear...:) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC