Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OH: Amicus Brief Filed Against Blackwell's Oppressive Voter Reg. Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 03:43 PM
Original message
OH: Amicus Brief Filed Against Blackwell's Oppressive Voter Reg. Rules
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 03:46 PM by kpete
State Senator Marc Dann files amicus brief on behalf of Legislators in Project Vote case against Blackwell’s oppressive voter registration rules.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Wednesday, August 2, 2006

State Senator Marc Dann files amicus brief on behalf of Legislators in Project Vote case against Blackwell’s oppressive voter registration rules. House, Senate members, say regulations violate basic

In a brief prepared and filed on behalf of and Senate Minority Leader C.J. Prentiss, House Minority Leader Joyce Beatty and 31 other members of the Ohio General Assembly, State Senator Marc Dann argues that new voter registration rules developed and imposed by Secretary of State Ken Blackwell violate the rights of Ohioans and should be scrapped.

Speaking at a press conference in front of the Federal Courthouse in Cleveland where the case is being heard by Judge Kathleen M. O’Malley, Senator Dann said it is both ironic and troubling that he and other members of the legislature are being forced to ask the Court to overturn Blackwell’s oppressive rules less than a week after the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 that broke down institutional barriers to the ballot box was extended.

In the amicus brief supporting the arguments made in the case filed by Project Vote, Common Cause Ohio, the People for the American Way Foundation, Communities of Faith Assemblies Church, and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) on July 6, Senator Dann states that the new rules “violate core political speech rights by imposing undue procedural burdens on voting rights and by imposing vague and confusing standards subject to criminal penalties.”

...........................

more at:
http://www.dannforohio.com/news.php?item.11.1

But a little something else was buried in that bill that may come back to bite Republicans. It gives the attorney general power to investigate and prosecute election fraud with a SIX YEAR statute of limitations. As in Democratic attorney general (Dann) elected in November = investigation of 2004 election in Ohio!

Said Dann: "I could convene a grand jury if I thought there was probable cause for voter suppression in 2004 and prosecute if I thought it to have been criminally motivated as well. Whether it rises to that level I don't know. But I would take a look at that."


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/2/163350/2986

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope there is justice for Ohio
What went on in Ohio in 2004 was not an election; it was a mockery, an illusion, a virtual election with no substance. When people are denied the right to vote based on the
whims of a powerful elite, democracy weeps in shame. Our nation was founded on the premise
that all men are created equal, we have strayed from that; it's true, but only at a loss to
our country as a whole. Our country can only be free when all voices can be heard. How can
we demand that individuals risk their lives in battle for our nation while we strip them
of the voting rights. It does not only diminish them but our whole nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kicking for Blackwell...in an orange jumpsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let's just kick *him*.
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 09:03 PM by Patsy Stone
My .02

:hi:

What are they hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. A Ken 'Hackwell' Kick inspired by Patsy Stone Thnx n/t
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 10:42 PM by JimDandy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I second the orange jumpsuit and the kick! (For the post AND for
Blackwell's sorry ass)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC