Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Network World article about Brennan report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:10 AM
Original message
Network World article about Brennan report
I get a daily email from SecuritySpace.com that lists articles on security issues. Last nights email had this in it:

The results are in: All e-voting machines vulnerable to software attacks
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/062906-e-voting-machines-vulnerable.html
Story from NetworkWorld

Network Worlds article:
"All three of the nation's most commonly used electronic voting systems are vulnerable to software attacks - attacks that could affect the outcome of local or national elections.
.....
Findings include:

* The systems are vulnerable to the injection of corrupt software or attack programs designed to take over a machine.
* Automatic audits are necessary.
* Wireless components are particularly at risk of infiltration, and the report recommends banning such components.
* Most states haven’t implemented measures to detect software attacks."

Links are provided in the article to the Brennan report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.
When intensely geekish publications like this one start with the stories, you know something is definitely up.

This story has gone viral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrsadm Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. ALL software is vulnerable
Spending my career in software for many years with a lot of programming experience, I can tell you with certainty that ALL software is vulnerable. It is just the degree of difficulty in cracking it that varies. Wireless technology especially should in no way be considered for voting data. Audits are critical to ensuring integrity. Backup paper trails - I think - should be required, so all results could be verified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC