Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E-Voting Security Ignored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:57 PM
Original message
E-Voting Security Ignored
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey!
Thanks! :hi:

Nothin' like spreading the election reform word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Harry Shearer read most of this on his "Le Show" radio show Sunday too
(Sunday, November 6, 2005 on "Le Show")

He read these sections from this Computer World .com article. <http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,105684,00.html>

Since we don't have the benefit of his inflections and sarcastic wit while reading this, I left out some of his asides and left in some additional text from the article for clarity sake. You can hear his show at <http://www.harryshearer.com/active/leShow.php> when the page is updated, usually on Tuesday, or they have a "POD Cast" at <http://www.kcrw.com/>, but without the music breaks, and at the links below:

GAO questions progress on e-voting standards


Questions about security, accuracy likely to continue into the '06 elections

News Story by Grant Gross
OCTOBER 24, 2005 (IDG NEWS SERVICE) - Questions about the security and accuracy of electronic voting systems are likely to continue into the 2006 national elections, because the U.S. government has not yet completed work on electronic voting guidelines, according to a new government report.

With lingering concerns about the security of e-voting systems, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) needs to define security policies and set up a machine-certification program... (report issued Friday by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).)

"Until these efforts are completed, there is a risk that many state and local jurisdictions will rely on voting systems that were not developed, acquired, tested, operated or managed in accordance with rigorous security and reliability standards -- potentially affecting the reliability of future elections and voter confidence..., the GAO report said.

The EAC, established with the "Help America Vote Act" passed by Congress in 2002, is working...to help state and local governments improve their management of e-voting systems, the GAO said. ...working on security and reliability standards and on programs to certify voting machines and accredit independent laboratories to test e-voting systems, the GAO said. But those efforts aren't finished and are "unlikely to have a significant effect in the 2006 federal election cycle," the report said....

(clip)

"...GAO asserted that electronic voting systems must be secure and reliable, and EAC agrees," the EAC statement said. "Security has always been a top priority at EAC...",

(clip)

...The EAC and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are developing a vulnerability analysis of e-voting systems, the statement said.

The EAC also questioned the GAO's reference to security and reliability questions about e-voting systems....

(clip)

...The GAO report relies on documents produced by other people, but the agency didn't substantiate those reports of security and reliability problems, the EAC added....

(clip)

...The Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), a trade group representing some e-voting machine vendors, said state election officials started late on working through e-voting machine concerns because of delays in Congress to set up the EAC...and because of congressional delays in funding. The EAC and NIST have, "put forth a steady stream of best-practices guidance,"

but Congress gave the EAC no regulatory authority to make states comply...



(clip)

...(Says) Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), chairman of the House Government Reform Committee..., "...It is certainly disappointing that, despite the recommendations from federal organizations and nongovernmental groups, many states still have not made progress to make sure their electronic voting systems are safe from fraud and can be relied on to accurately count votes...,"

(clip)

...Democrats, however, called for congressional action, (Michigan Rep. John Conyers Jr.)


(And Harry Shearer called for voting with Paper and Pencil, like they do in Austrailia...):banghead: :mad:

<http://www.kcrw.com/>
<http://www.kcrw.org/podcast/>

Or you try to catch it "live" through one of the local stations with on-line streaming (list at this link): <http://www.publicradiofan.com/cgi-bin/program.pl?programid=60>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peggy Day Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've been trying to question news agencies
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 09:43 AM by Peggy Day
about why they aren't covering the GAO report.
Any suggestions about a list of newscaster emails?
or better yet, phone numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. At this point, they would tell you that it's "old news," your best bet...
...at this point would be Magazines or web sites like "The Nation" or "American Prospect" magazines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC