Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brad Blog: Dieb Throat weighs in on Diebold's stunning stock plunge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:27 PM
Original message
Brad Blog: Dieb Throat weighs in on Diebold's stunning stock plunge
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 04:28 PM by AtLiberty
DIEB-THROAT Weighs in on Diebold's Stunning 15.5% Wednesday Stock Plunge

Disputes Voting Machine Company's Explanations for Lowered Forecasts, Compares Company to Enron...

Points to Mismanagement, Failed Voting Equipment, Homeland Security Warnings and CEO O'Dell's $3m Salary as More Likely Causes


9/22/05
Brad Blog


Our still-anonymous Diebold Insider -- who we call DIEB-THROAT -- has some thoughts on Wednesday's sudden and stunning 15.5% one-day plunge in Diebold, Inc. share prices as reported earlier today by The BRAD BLOG.

"What a difference a few months makes," DIEB-THROAT wrote after the market close on Wednesday. "Back in July, Diebold told investors during its conference call the election revenues were sound and expected to grow." Yes, DIEB-THROAT was on that conference call. "Now all of a sudden Diebold's O'Dell tells investors of $10 million in lower revenues from election systems alone. Perhaps what Diebold isn't talking about is the $500,000 a month in legal fees they were spending in California, or the current rash of problems with touch screen systems that freeze up when votes are cast. Using Hurricane Katrina is a poor excuse for bad products - the last time this kind of deception occurred it was called Enron."

The blistering comments about Hurricane Katrina were in regard to Diebold's press release early Wednesday morning attributing much of their lowered forecasts for 3rd quarter and full-year earnings to the hurricane. The "freeze up" on Diebold's touch-screen voting machines has long plagued the North Canton, Ohio-based company, and a recent massive test of the equipment by California's Republican Sec. of State Bruce McPhereson confirmed that a full 20% of Diebold's machines either froze up or had printer jams.

When The BRAD BLOG spoke last week with Diebold spokesperson, David Bear about the California tests, Bear repeated several times times that "there were a total of 10 printer-jams after 11,000 votes were cast." When asked several times about similar statistics concerning the number of screen freeze-ups, Bear was unable to give us any information or numbers whatsoever.

For the full story, go to:

www.bradblog.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. P.S.
XOXOX to Brad! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Brad is a class act! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Stock
is most probably getting creamed from the lowered earnings expectations. The Street hates that crap.

Printers jams...that's a laugh...what are they printing...it certainly isn't a paper trail.

If Diebold, who made its name in banking equipment, is really in trouble, it would be a perfect time for a (cough)-liberal-(cough) consortium (Soros are you listening) to buy the company and take it private. Then they could release the first open source, paper trail ballot machines. These would be inherently more reliable than the proprietary black boxes they produce now plagued with all that hidden election theft code. (Wouldn't it be sweet if after buying Diebold, they found the rigged source code...heh heh)

At the very least they could assure themselves of not only increasing market share vis a vis the closed source competition, they might be able to blunt the Pug vote rigging, at least somewhat.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC