Here is the leter I sent in response to the one I recived back from my senator
The Honorable Senator Feinstein
Thank you for your prompt response on my concerns over the possible
fraudulent election we had last week. But I feel your response was
inadequate as we had an election that was quite out of touch with reality and now we have the GOP calling for an abandonment of exit polls since right now they are the best indicator we have that the election was not fair and square! I have now come across a video clip that shows a member of congress a republican talking about the election being over hear what he had to say, I know it is undated but I feel it good enough to get you to start asking questions as to what really happened last Tuesday Nov 2nd.
Here is a quicktime mov where Pete King, Rep NY states
"it is already over the election is over we won" how do you know that? "it's all over but the counting... and we'll take care of the counting"
see the movie clip here
http://homepage.mac.com/duffyb/nobush/iMovieTheater256.htmlI would point out that even MSNBC thinks there is something funny with the election especialy in Ohio see the following from
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6442857KEITH OLBERMANN, HOST: Which of these stories will you be talking about
tomorrow? Additional reports every minute. So six congressmen write
demanding an immediate investigation. Did the new voting technology tamper
with last week's presidential election? Why did an Ohio county lock down
its vote count, claiming it was for homeland security purposes? Why did 29
heavily Democratic Florida counties, with optical ballot scanners, wind up
voting heavily Republican? Full coverage ahead.
Our fifth story on the COUNTDOWN, there is a small but blood curdling group
of reports of voting irregularities and possible fraud principally in Ohio
and Florida. That group of reports is moving from that end of the spectrum
in which believers are likely to be wearing hats made out of Reynolds wrap
to the other end of the spectrum in which the believers are going to the
general accounting office and perhaps the FBI. The mainstream newspaper,
the "Cincinnati Inquirer," reports that officials in Warren County, Ohio,
that's 20 miles northeast of Cincinnati, locked down their administration
building last Tuesday night to prevent anybody from observing the vote
count. Moreover the secrecy, unique among all 88 of Ohio's counties, was
attributed to concerns about potential terrorism.
The newspaper reports that Warren County emergency services director Frank
Young had recommended the walling off of the vote count based on information
received from the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI Mr. Young did
not explain whether al Qaeda might have been planning to hit Caesar Creek
State Park in Waynesville or the King's Island Amusement Park. After some
negotiating, reporters were finally admitted to that building around
midnight. They were kept in the lobby. The counting went on unobserved two
floors above them. Warren County's polls were among the last in Ohio to
close, thus among the last to report and thus among the votes that clinched
the state and the election for President Bush. A local television news
director called the homeland security explanation a, quote, " red herring."
County prosecutor Rachel Hutzel told the newspaper that the Warren County
commissioners were, quote, "within their rights to lock the building down,
even though no other Ohio county did so because having photographers or
reporters present could have interfered with the count." You bet, Rachel.
Ohio, whose 20 electoral votes were based on a margin of 2 percent in the
vote, has other problems tonight. The state reports 92,000 presidential
votes did not count. Ranging from votes improperly cast to votes improperly
counted. And in Cuyahoga County, that is greater Cleveland, the official
records of 29 different voting precincts show more votes than registered
voters to a total of 93,000 extra votes in that county alone.
Despite the fact that he state's that the Tin Foil factor might be in play,
he is seriously reporting this story one of the very few in the Quote
Mainstream Media to do so.
As I said in my first email to you I don't want to see another challenge in
the electoral college be unsupported by our democratic senators as it stands
right now if there is not an immediate and true investigation into those
allegations of Election Tampering then I will indeed along with many others
leave the Democratic Party as the Democrats apparently will just play dead
and roll over when the republicans tell them to!
Sincerely
xxxx
USA, RET
----- Original Message -----
From: <senator@xxxxx.senate.gov>
To: <xxxxx@xxx.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:49 AM
Subject: Senator Dianne Feinstein responding to your message
November 9, 2004
Mr. xxxx
xxxxxx California 90xxx
Dear Mr. Ramirez:
Thank you for writing to me about voter confidence in elections. I
appreciate hearing from you and welcome the opportunity to respond.
A number of bills, which address the issue of voter confidence,
have been introduced in the 108th Congress. Some bills, such as H.R. 2239
and S. 1980, would require voting machines to produce a permanent paper
record so that voters can check the accuracy of their votes and officials
can
conduct a manual audit or recount should either one be necessary. I am
currently reviewing a number of legislative options that have been
proposed to ensure an accurate and reliable voting system. As it became
clear in recent elections, inadequate voting mechanisms can be detrimental
to the integrity of our electoral process.
To address voting concerns, such as voter ballot verification and
others, I supported the AHelp America Vote Act", which became law
December 29, 2002. Among other reforms, the AHelp America Vote Act@
created a new federal Elections Assistance Commission to ensure that all
voting technologies are tested for accuracy and to provide procedures for
decertification of a technology that is subsequently found to be inadequate.
The Commission is also responsible for distributing federal grants to state
electorates for improvement of their electoral processes. States still
maintain control over election administration, but the law introduces a
degree of federal oversight and assistance.
Again, thank you for writing. I hope you will continue to keep me
informed on issues of importance to you. Should you have any further
questions or comments, please feel free to call my Washington, D.C. staff
at (202) 224-3841.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
http://feinstein.senate.govFurther information about my position on issues of concern to California and
the
Nation are available at my website
http://feinstein.senate.gov. You can
also
receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at
http://feinstein.senate.gov/issue.html.