Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Update from New Yorkers for Verified Voting!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 03:08 PM
Original message
Update from New Yorkers for Verified Voting!
--------------------------------------
HAVA conference committee
--------------------------------------

As of today, 4/18/05, there is no scheduled conference committee meeting.
The last meeting was on March 23, almost a month ago. The Senate has refused
to sign the assembly's certificate authorizing the continuation of the
committee. There has been a back and forth between the two houses over when
and how the certificate should be extended with the senate making a series
of demands, the most recent of which was that the assembly pass the database
and complaint procedure bills that have been agreed upon. The Assembly has
promised to move the bills through the Ways and Means Committee next week
and to the floor for a vote after that. However, the senate still refuses
to come to the table.

Assemblyman Keith Wright issued a press release calling on the senate to
reconvene the conference committee, and to "stop dragging their feet."
Included in the release was a letter from Wright to Flanagan dated April 4th
asking him to reactivate the committee and work toward a final package.

The outstanding issues that the conference committee has to deal with are
voting machines, and voter verification. We seem to have won solid support
for precinct based optical scan systems in the Assembly, but the Senate
support does not yet seem to be there (although individual Senators often
tell us they like the optical scan alternative).

Whether the HAVA conference committee will pass legislation requiring paper
ballots and optical scan is still an open question. We hope that the Senate
committee members will get behind optical scan.

This week, give the HAVA conference committee members (especially the
Senators) a call and remind them that New Yorkers want paper ballots!

http://www.nyvv.org/actionConferenceCommitteeMembers.htm

--------------------------------------
NYVV releases acquisition cost comparison
--------------------------------------
On April 13, 2005, New Yorkers for Verified Voting released an
Acquisition Cost Analysis comparing the purchase costs of DREs vs. Optical
Scan systems for all counties in New York State.

The analysis shows the following Acquisition costs:

Electronic voting machines (DREs):
$230,473,000

Paper Ballots & Precinct based Optical Scan:
$114,423,640

Cost SAVINGS from Optical Scan: $116,049,360

You can download a copy here:
http://nyvv.org/doc/AcquisitionCostDREvOptScanNYS.pdf

Let's get this circulating among all the local and state legislators and
election commissioners.

--------------------------------------
Support Bill A6503, Urge Senate companion bill
--------------------------------------
The new "Scan and Be Sure" bill introduced by Assemblywomen Sandy Galef and
Barbara Lifton, A6503, would mandate the use of paper ballots and
precinct-count optical scanners. We need the NY State Senate to introduce
and pass a companion Scan and Be Sure bill.

Call your state senator and tell them about the advantages of optical scan -
the reliability, the paper ballots, the cost savings! Send them the link to
New Yorkers for Verified Voting's acquisition cost analysis. We don't want
electronic voting, and we can't afford it!

Then call your state assembly member. Tell them the same thing, and send the
link. Tell them to cosponsor and support the Scan and Be Sure bill, A6503.

To look up your state legislators, go to:
http://www.nyvv.org/actionStateOfficial.htm#statelegislator

--------------------------------------
Newspapers continue to endorse PBOS!
--------------------------------------
More and more newspapers are coming out with endorsements for paper ballots
and optical scan. This Sunday, the Syracuse Post Standard became the latest
major New York State newspaper to endorse PBOS.

Please contact the editorial boards of your local paper to arrange a meeting
to discuss paper ballots and optical scan. Contact me if you'd like help
with the presentation.

Here's a list of recent endorsements:

Syracuse Post-Standard - 4/17/05
http://www.syracuse.com/news/poststandard/index.ssf?/base/opinion-4/11136405
88152910.xml&coll=1

Elmira Star Gazette - 3/29/05
http://www.stargazettenews.com/opinion/Tuopin1.html

Troy Record - - 3/20/05
http://www.troyrecord.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1170&dept_id=7018&newsid=1418412
6&PAG=461&rfi=9

Eagle Regional Newspapers - 3/20/05
An editorial endorsing paper ballots and optical scan appeared in the Eagle
regional papers in Chittenango, Canastota, and in the Oneida Press on March
30, 2005. We currently do not have an online link to the endorsement.

New York Times - 3/9/05
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/article.php?id=5638

New York Daily News - 3/9/05
http://www.nydailynews.com/03-09-2005/news/ideas_opinions/story/288160p-2466
77c.html

--------------------------------------
Town And County Resolutions
--------------------------------------
There are now several towns and counties that have passed resolutions
calling for paper ballot and optical scan. Getting towns and counties to
call for optical scan is an important part of our strategy. I've been making
presentations with local citizens to counties around the state as part of
this effort. Please contact me (bolipari@nyvv.org) and let's get working on
one in your county or town!

Meetings with county officials can get important media coverage. Here's an
article from Otsego County where we presented to the IGA committee:
http://www.thedailystar.com/news/stories/2005/04/13/vot6.html

We have several counties now working on passing resolutions. Here is the
current list of optical scan resolutions which have passed:

Tompkins County
http://nyvv.org/doc/TompkinsResolution.pdf

Schuyler County
(No link yet)

Putnam County
http://nyvv.org/doc/PutnamResolution.pdf

Greenburgh Town Board
http://nyvv.org/doc/GreenburghResolution.pdf

Philipstown Town Board
(No link yet)

--------------------------------------
Help Wanted
--------------------------------------
The more successful we've been, the more work we have to do. We need to
enlist some people who are willing to commit several hours a week to helping
us with the many different tasks we need to get done. Let me know if you can
help out with any of the following:

1) Web master - Keeping our NYVV website up to date is very important, but
hard to do with so much going on. We need an experienced web master who can
help us post information in a timely fashion, and to rework our site to add
some planned improvements.

2) Researchers - We are gathering data from counties around the US using
optical scan systems. We need individuals willing to make long distance
calls and interview election officials about their experiences with optical
scan.

3) Voting Equipment specialists - We want to develop a core of specialists
who know everything there is to know about the different voting machines
being offered to New York. You'll need a technical background, the ability
to analyze technical specifications, and a modest writing ability to compile
reports on the machines.

If you can volunteer for any of the work above, please let me know at
bolipari@nyvv.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!
Great overview. Great post - full of some good, good stuff.

Let's keep it kicked!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. OptiScans are Opti-Illusional
Both DREs and OptiScans fundamentally process votes in a similar fashion. Both provide Hidden Ballots and Hidden Counting.
Relying on recounting paper ballots is delusional given the fact that recounts were halted in Florida, Ohio and New Mexico.

New York: DON'T SETTLE FOR any system that offers feel good paper ballots that are never counted. Remember: its not about the machine, its all about having our votes processed and counted accurately.

Both DREs and OptiScan systems "interpret" the voter's input and "derive" data records which are the true ballots that are then counted.

If you insist on digital vote processing, then insist on seeing and verifying your ballot that is counted - your data record in the vote database.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Kip. Would "Open Software" provide a safeguard? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatePeriduct Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good info here, we can use in my state...thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC