Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jimmy Carter to Chair Election Reform Commission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:34 PM
Original message
Jimmy Carter to Chair Election Reform Commission
Note the public hearings, in D.C. on April 18th and in Houston in June.
-------------------------


(note - i dont have the original link to this article, so i have the copyright below)


Jimmy Carter to Chair Election Reform Commission
Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:29 PM ET


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former President Jimmy Carter will lead a bipartisan commission to examine problems with the U.S. election system, American University's Center for Democracy and Election Management said on Thursday.

Carter, a Democrat whose Carter Center has monitored more than 50 elections around the world, will co-chair the private commission with Republican James Baker, who served as Secretary of State under President George H. W. Bush.

Former Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, a Democrat who lost his seat in the 2004 election, will also participate.

"I am concerned about the state of our electoral system and believe we need to improve it," Carter said in a statement. He said the group will assess "issues of inclusion" in federal voting and propose recommendations to improve the process.

"We will try to define an electoral system for the 21st century that will make Americans proud again," he said.

Though disputes over recounts and voter eligibility marred the 2000 U.S. presidential election, international monitors in place in November 2004 reported the polls were mostly fair.

Still, concerns emerged about exceedingly long lines that kept voters from the polls in several states including Ohio, whose 20 electoral college votes ultimately decided the election in President Bush's favor.

The Center for Democracy and Election Management, which will organize the work of Carter's commission, said the group would hold two public hearings -- the first on April 18 at American University in Washington and the second at Houston's Rice University in June.

The Commission on Federal Election Reform aims to produce a report to Congress on its findings by September.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This service is not intended to encourage spam. The details provided by your colleague have been used for the sole purpose of facilitating this email communication and have not been retained by Reuters. Your personal details have not been added to any database or mailing list.
If you would like to receive news articles delivered to your email address, please subscribe at www.reuters.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

© Copyright Reuters 2005. All rights reserved. Any copying, re-publication or re-distribution of Reuters content or of any content used on this site, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written consent of Reuters.
Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Reuters, the members of its Group and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

© Reuters 2005. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am very happy about that appointment
Jimmy Carter is a stand up guy and a person who will do the right thing.

If he is on the panel, there is going to be at least one person we can depend on there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice man
Hard to believe he is an Evangelical but he is nice and decent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hopefully, Baker will not try to sabotage
everything the Jimmy Carter tries to accomplish. I think Mr. Carter will be able to do much to bring to light the problems in the current voting system(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golden voyages Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I truly believe his only reason for being there is to do exactly that
Remember this is the guy that led the fight AGAINST having an accurate Florida recount in 2000. And worse still, he's not the only BFEE stooge on the commission. Robert Mosbacher and Kay Coles James are also on board.

http://domino.american.edu/AU/media/mediarel.nsf/1D265343BDC2189785256B810071F238/0C0A0C2B9D2F70A485256FCE00622C64?OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is a real concern of mine.
Though if anyone can keep it from going into a political f***fest it is Jimmy Carter. Hopefully he can keep the group above that type of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was excited until I saw that James Baker is chairing the committee.
How convenient to the Repugs' acquired knowledge & experience of election fraud through electronic voting machines.

James Baker is the fox guarding the henhouse for this administration. Must be protected at all turns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Blather!
Here's a link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64340-2005Mar24.html

Baker is very powerful and very dangerous. I don't think Carter at 80 can keep this from being a complete sham, or worse, sending the authorities in the exact wrong direction.

Besides, Carter and his Carter Center studiously getting involved at all when Georgia was stolen in the 2002 mid-term. Despite desperate pleas from the Georgia citizen investigators.

It's a private commission. So, who appointed Baker? Inquiring citizens want to know.

We should appoint our OWN damn commission. Instead of tolerating these sham ones.

Okay, the floor is open for nominations.

Journalists? Election officials? Investigators? Computer experts? Citizens? Activists? Experts from other countries, like Canada, who can report on their system of paper ballots? Politicians? Voting Machine Company officials?

Who would YOU put on a commission to improve (not FIX) elections?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is Baker a co-chair?
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 02:52 PM by Bill Bored
The article says "Carter to Chair." This is misleading if he too is a co-chair. False sense of security for Democrats.

If they want a Republican co-chair, they should consider McCain or one of the retired ex-Nixon guys who has come out against some of the Bush doctrine on truly Conservative grounds. Besides, we have been there and done this already. Wasn't it Carter/Ford last time? Fat load of good it did.

I do like Jimmy though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. John Conyers, Barbara Boxer and Keith Olbermann
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Baker's presence will make this worthless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. We need to lobby the shit out of Carter

There needs to be something more than another commission completed via "auto-pilot".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It will be a replay of Warren Christopher vs. Baker, FL 2000.
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 09:17 PM by Bill Bored
You have the elder statesman against the shark.
Carter needs a shark on his side too. A Land Shark, so to speak.
Maybe Nader or Cobb, but of course, these corporate commissions never have more than the two major parties. Just like the Debate Commission.

So what can we do?

Maybe lobby AGAINST Baker and make them find a Repub with a conscience.
Warren Rudman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. "...November 2004 reported the polls were mostly fair"???
It looks like this is NOT planned to be a "fair" (truly broad-reaching and unbiased) Commission. Considering the language above, AND the appointment of Baker??? Ahh come on!

Watch the documentary, "Invisible Ballots". They showed Baker singing the mantra, "punch cards baaad, electronic voting goood".

This is like having the fox investigate the suspicious murders in the hen house!

I hope Jimmy can pull this one off; but I have a feeling Bushco is trying to stack the deck against him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is really great news
I just hope that something is done with whatever results they come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is a total surprise and despite the naysayers, is good news. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. The Bigger Picture ... (and an AP link)
The BIG news here is that the DC/Media Analstocracy is nervous enough to circle the wagons, big time.

The Baker-bot is only called up for active duty to tend to the real crises. And having to lend him Mossbacher shows just how much shaking is going on in those overpriced cowboy boots.

Now, I expect them to succeed in rolling Carter and Daschle like they did Warren Christopher (et. al.) in their 2000 Treason Campaign. But even that may not be as sure a bet as you'd think.

(It's even possible that Daschle, in particular, may have had his head removed from the large sphincter muscle that is the DC beltway just long enough to be able to think and speak with some degree of reality beyond the Euphemedia haze.)

But whatever they do is irrelevant to the fact that their existence demonstrates that the good guys are making an impact.

This is already a trohpy for our side!

-
AP item:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=613372

(Note that they've made Molinari a Dem - idiots.)

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC