Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone simplify the Ohio and Florida FRAUD for me???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
sandboxface Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:51 PM
Original message
Can someone simplify the Ohio and Florida FRAUD for me???
I was on top of everything until yesterday. I've lost my footing and need some help getting back up.

Have both Ohio and Florida updated their numbers? Has this changed anything with our analysis? Which counties are still affected?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO. NO. and All.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandboxface Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well...
It looks like both Ohio and Florida have updated their numbers, but they still don;t make sense. Can anyone explain?? PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nateddi Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. fraud
The exit polls for the electronic counties/states do not match official results, but exit polls match paper ballot states/counties. Very unlikely.

HOWEVER:

One common anamoly is a red herring, we need to stop being proponents of this theory:

The small counties in FL that are overwhelmingly democratic registered, but voted Bush, are red herrings. There was no fraud. This is dixiecrat land in the panhandle. In 2000 they voted Bush also, in 1996 they voted for Dole. The fraud theories ARE being publicized more and more each day, eventually the right-wingers will need to stop ignoring them, this is why its necessary to filter out the red herrings NOW. I suggest you spread this analysis to all other fraud theorists before the right starts to ridicule this flawed logic.

in solidarity,

AS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But please remember -- just because those counties
(heavily Dem registered but apparently heavy Repug Pres. voters) went for Bush doesn't mean that they went for Bush quite so overwhelmingly as the numbers appear.

What I mean here is, as someone else pointed out on another thread, what better place to shave votes than where the outcome is basically already known -- in heavily pro-Dem counties/areas and heavily pro-Repug counties? IOW, if the actual vote for Bush is 5,500, why not make it 6,500 or 7,000, shaving off the comparable votes from Kerry and third party candidate(s) if available?

We need to be looking down the ticket, as some have, to better identify some of these patterns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nateddi Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that's possible
that's possible, but unless you have evidence to prove that, we should not be mentioning these dixiecrat counties because it makes us looks half-witted and easily jumping to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Zogby said...
as linked in another thread...

http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=10385

It is important that people know how accurate random sampling of historical events can be in order for them to understand how unlikely it is that the exit polls were wrong. So if you want to fight the battle correctly, you must get more statisticians and forensic accountants involved as well as the lawyers. These statisticians can show with great credibility the probability of manipulation within the computer programs used for counting the ballots. They do this kind of work all the time to uncover fraud based upon computer manipulation in commercial and corporate activities. And these types of expert analyses are admissible in a court of law. The problem with all of this is determining who is going to fund such an investigation. Where will the money come from? Perhaps the Kerry/Edwards campaign fund has some surplus that can be used. It is possible that the DNC has some excess funds. How about the 527s and PACs who spent millions on ineffective political ads, coming up with a few million? In addition, who is going to lead the process of getting this done? This kind of an effort requires solidarity along with an organized coordinated effort. It's easy to come up with the forensic and technical people to get this done, but we need a strong leader and solidarity. Leadership and funding-- these are the two real challenges that must be dealt with in the coming days. We have a Watergate story here that could give the media a post election explosive news story that could make the 2000 Florida vote debacle look like small potatoes. We need to get the media to see that votergate 2004 is huge news and we need to quickly fund the investigation and get Democratic leaders behind it.

Sheldon Drobny is CPA and Venture Capitalist and co-founder of Air America Radio.

(11/9/2004)
- By Sheldon Drobny, Op-Ed News


________________________________________________________________

Gee, I wonder what they are trying to tell us??? PLEASE READ THE LAST TWO SENTENCES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC