Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pedro's response to having police remove him from Broward machine test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:09 PM
Original message
Pedro's response to having police remove him from Broward machine test

As far as I know, all the statements below(from DU) are accurate. I would add that when the Broward Sheriff’s Office (BSO) deputy ordered Ellen Brodsky and me out of the room and then demanded identification, the documentary crew had their cameras rolling, and we were allowed back into the room. After the video crew drove away, while I was writing down Broward SOE Gisela Sale’s contact information, the BSO deputy ordered me to leave. Rather than waiting for me to finish writing the contact information as I had suggested, he grabbed me by the arm and physically removed me from the building. I do not understand why I had to be forcibly removed, and with such urgency no less.



I would also add that it appeared that the decision to call BSO was made by Dr Snipes’ assistant. I do not know if Dr Snipes played a role in that.



Regarding the Logic and Accuracy testing, a test performed by dozens of voters is not adequate for assuring the accuracy of a regular election with thousands of voters, where many more votes are cast. The November 2004 amendment 4 vote, where the Broward ES&S machines subtracted vote totals that exceeded thirty-two thousand, has proven that this L&A method does not provide assurance. Even a first semester programming student could write software that would count votes differently based on how many votes are cast.


Without a human-readable paper trail, false votes cannot be detected. Moreover, without open-source software, such errors or fraud are harder to prevent or detect. Both factors are essential for enabling public trust in computer voting machines.


You can use my name. For the record, I have an Electrical Engineering degree and a master’s degree in Computer Engineering.


Pedro

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/1954.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've heard before the assistant appears to be power behind the throne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC