Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about California - exit polls / popular vote...??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:56 PM
Original message
Question about California - exit polls / popular vote...??
There's been a lot of talk about trimming off Kerry votes in some states to pad the national popular vote. It's been suggested here that CA was one of those states.

But looking at TIA's latest chart:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=286098&mesg_id=286098

it appears that CA was one of the few states that the exit polls were off in Kerry's favor by a little.

I don't see how we can think that CA votes were trimmed to pad the national popular vote if the exit poll was so close to the actual vote and it was off in the wrong direction.

Any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you can make arguments that support cheating on both sides
what happens?

No one can make their point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not saying both sides cheated...
the exit polls were within the margin of error for CA. that's my point. there is no evidence of funny business in CA.

that's why I'm saying,,, unless I'm missing something we should stop saying that CA had irregularities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Let me ask you this....
for what purpose do you modify the results of a random survey?

The essence of my question is when you modify the results of a random survey to verify the results of a non-random survey what you end up with is really just two different non-random surveys that inevitably only act to support each other.

Why in democracy do you need to two different non-random surveys to measure voter intent? The only thing they convince "the people" of is voter intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. these exit polls were not modified
I don't follow your point. the exit poll data in TIA's post is before they were changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Which number is wrong pole, vote or both?
Do you realize how big the state of California is? If you wanted results of a poll in the state to match you just have to pick the right places to poll it's easier than fixing the poll numbers.

This is where I think the crime would become apparent for most people, the polling place choices could simply have leaned Bush. Just like all the glitches, on Nov 2. it's eveything leans Bush day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think you're looking at the exit poll data
the exit polls for each state have a margin of error. The argument that election fraud advocates are making is that the exit polls are extremely reliable and they have been ever since they've been in use. The exit polls are right on for CA.

We can't have it both ways. If we're going to say that OH, FL, and the other 18 states that are outside the margin of error, are a smoking gun that the election was stolen, we can't turn around and say the exit polls were wrong in CA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Do you think reps and some dems are protecting this election
Edited on Tue Jan-18-05 06:28 PM by libertypirate
or the system by which elects them unfairly into office.

All these glitches are unconnected except they all benifit *. How hard is it to pre-fix the exit pols by just selecting the ones that recently voted for *? Would this be just another glitch?

I know what your saying but I think part of the problem is the reps want Americans to believe they have more support then they actually do, and they will do anything to make this belief a reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's possible for both the exit polls and the vote count to be wrong
As the pollsters have over-emphasized, they got it wrong. But how wrong? Wrong towards Kerry or wrong towards Bush? We don't know without a look at the source data.
Right now nothing is verified, or even verifiable in some cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. huh?
we're using the "scoop" exit poll data to argue that several states have very high diversion from exit polls, way outside the margin of error.

the same exit polls show basically no problem in CA.

I don't know where the evidence is that there were problems in CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've argued, generally, that "Popular Padding" was part of the deal.
I think I saw a complaint on a thread about CA, but if CA and a few other states didn't get involved in padding there are plenty of other states.

I also wondered about races OTHER THAN Pres., as targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. i agree... there was padding, but I don't see it in CA nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Have you seen states where there may have been padding AND
a tight race other than Pres.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm only looking at the pres race...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC