Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some more thoughts on Supervisor of Elections....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:20 PM
Original message
Some more thoughts on Supervisor of Elections....
Forgive me for using you as a sounding board, but this seems to be the best forum for discussing election reform. While contemplating a run for the position in my county I started thinking about the SOEs around the nation. Many seats may be up well before my county's office expires in 2008. We should really focus on making these high profile races.

I hate to admit my gross ignorance with respect to this position, but for years I thought it was appointed by the county commission. I didn't even remember it being on the ballot until an ethical question came up last week! That's how uncontested the SOE job is here. You never see any yard signs, direct mail, etc. I don't know if it is similar in other areas, but I suspect it might be since I've never given it much thought and I've lived in five different counties since being of voting age.

We need to:

1. Identify candidates who have the ability to do the job, are theoretically electable and believe that HAVA doesn't go far enough so they are willing to initiate "election reform" through their decision making authority.

2. Get them the backing and support they need to run an effective contest based on the goal of 100% voter confidence in the system.

3. Work hard on their campaigns to make sure they are high profile and the message of fair and transparent elections resulting in 100% voter confidence gets disseminated far and wide.

This just popped into my head because I believe lobbying from the top down will only go so far. We also need to make change from the bottom up. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree with you. I think the position of Secretary
of State in many states has been prioritized and filled by the Republicans to protect "their" election outcomes. Their other priority seems to include Supreme Court Judge positions. Hummmmm, I wonder why....

(I know I'm paranoid at this point BUT, seems to look that way to me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Two other positions that need to become higher profile.
I don't think you are being paranoid at all. Taking back the authority locally and at the state level is going to be key in the coming years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC