Other Places on the Net are Reporting Clear Evidence of Crime!

JoMama49

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-01-05 02:28 AM
Original message

Other Places on the Net are Reporting Clear Evidence of Crime!

For instance, this post from John Ervin of Anti-bush2004 <muservin@yahoo.com>

UPDATE: MITOFSKY EXIT POLLS OF OUR "ELECTIONS" CLEAR EVIDENCE OF CRIME

We've just spent several hours analyzing the apparently "leaked" Mitofsky Exit Polls that were the raw data of all our 2004 "elections" and were provided to the major networks, just not to the voters (Big Newz claims to be the "owners" of the data we offer them after voting).

We focused in on one indicator of fraud: if you look at the different pdf files, they are grouped at scoop.co.nz in three groups, or scrutinies of the voters. We looked at the "PRES04" files, toward the lower part of each grouping of about a dozen poll results, each twelve pages long. The "PRES04" that lists as "filter(s)" the words "total results" which can be found under the network logos in upper left corner of each file, pg. 1 (you'll see the NBC peacock, among others) is the most immediately "revealing" file. It shows, at a glance a most astonishing result: there were three of these posted:

1) the first total percentage, country-wide, for the presidential race was posted before 4 PM on Election Day itself (we're assuming EST as the Time Zone, though we didn't see that indicated). The national overall results show Kerry winning 51 to 48 per cent of the vote.

2) the second over all result for President was time-stamped a little before the 8 PM closing of most polls, and showed Kerry winning 51 to 48 per cent; in other words, the same result.

3) the last result posted for the overall result (i.e. the popular vote) for the presidential race was time-stamped almost a day later, and a couple of hours after Kerry conceded, and show the same result, but as if the names had been switched over the columns: in this final exit poll, posted almost 18 hours later, Bush is now "winning" 51 to 48 per cent.

Clearly, the networks might have a number of ways to rationalize this enormous turnaround: a late surge for Bush, or whatever; but given the mounting evidence of inexplicable reversals in places like Oklahoma (where Kerry was winning in 57 counties with 70 per cent of the vote being counted, and wound up losing ALL 57 counties) all of these data deserve a profound examination, just for starters in an inquiry into much, much evidence of fraud. Such sudden reversals in exit polls we believe to be a world first, in general elections, and don't pass the sniff test. Such a thing could not float in the Ukraine, as studiously covered in the U.S. as the Scott Peterson trial, so why should we let it float here? I'll continue to ask that question until someone in government gives me a meaningful response.....

We must continue to refuse all the results of all these elections, as long as the legitimacy of our governments and "elected" representatives cannot be authenticated. Saying so --even from 300 million TV's and radios-- doesn't make it so.

Accept no substitutes!

Meanwhile: Happy New Year

Peace: JE