I thought I'd post this letter to the editor here from Matt Smith at UNISON. It illustrates the nonsense of "public sector pay restraint."
Unnamed "experts" say wage rises fuel inflation do they (your report and analysis, 13 August)? Well actually, no they don't, and it is significant that your reporter couldn't find one to put their name to this myth. In particular, Bill Jamieson's concentration on "public- sector wages" is even more divorced from reality. Warwick University economics professor Andrew Oswald in the Financial Times has said that "an undergraduate who wrote in an essay that inflation was caused by public-sector wage rises would receive a 'fail'." And this message was repeated in the paper's editorial columns, where Nuffield College's Stephen Nickell stated that public-sector pay rises "have nothing to do with inflation".
Inflation is a measure of how much people pay for what they buy, not the wages of those who provide public services. Or, as Professor Nickell says: "It is the things that are produced by the private sector that go to the calculation of inflation – haircuts, potatoes." In the same report, other economists, from universities and the City backed that view. Martin Weale of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research commented: "What I really can't believe is that when private-sector pay rises are 4 per cent, a pay rise of 2.5 per cent for the public sector is inflationary."
Elsewhere, other respected commentators – such as Iain MacWhirter – have also exposed this myth, pointing out that "despite average wages and salaries declining in Britain in real terms, inflation is gaining momentum. The assumption that price increases simply follow wage pressure is not justified."
Workers in Scotland's local government are the victims of inflation, not the cause. They deserve a fair wage to provide us with the essential services we all use, and they are fighting in the Unison union to get one.
MATT SMITH
Scottish Secretary, Unison
West Campbell Street
Glasgow
Source:
http://news.scotsman.com/letters?articleid=4388569