Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tories defend appointment of judge who, as a lawyer, worked for Hells Angels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:19 PM
Original message
Tories defend appointment of judge who, as a lawyer, worked for Hells Angels
OTTAWA—The Conservative government is defending its nomination of a Quebec judge who used to be a lawyer for members of the Hells Angels.

The Tories named Jacques Leger, a former Conservative party president, to the Quebec Court of Appeal in January 2009.

But media reports have revealed that Leger advised members of the biker gang on commercial rights before he became a Quebec Superior Court justice in 2006.

The NDP and Bloc Quebecois blasted the government during question period over Leger’s nomination.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/802683--tories-defend-appointment-of-judge-who-as-a-lawyer-worked-for-hells-angels?bn=1

Defending people is part of what lawyers have to do.

But having the flags waved and still continuing in this seems to be wrong.

Looks like perhaps the Hells Angels may have enveloped Harper.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ZeitgeistObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. A third connection to the Hell's Angels!
Just who is running our govt anyway??
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is an interesting series of events.
Laureen has a thing for motorcycles. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ZeitgeistObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's like fucking Japan...
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 11:51 PM by BolivarianHero
The corrupt, conservative LDP's far-right factions had intimate relationships with the Yakuza.

Either way, this asshole will throw the book at independent cannabis growers to make his gangster-rapist-druglord buddies happ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
edwinmathews Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do we
really want to base who can be a judge on who they have defended in the past ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ZeitgeistObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It was the way Cons determined it in the past.
Stockwell Day once publically went on a crusade against a lawyer because the lawyer had as I recall, a pedophile client in the past.

But they use lawyers who have defended neo-nazis and Hells Angels in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not as long as that's all it is
Though I doubt that most Conservatives would be as reasonable about the matter, given their disparagement of "trial lawyers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC