Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rules teen filed false report in rape case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Oregon Donate to DU
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:23 AM
Original message
Judge rules teen filed false report in rape case
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/front_page/1133582149167361.xml&coll=7&thispage=1

Saturday, December 03, 2005
DAVID R. ANDERSON

BEAVERTON -- A municipal judge found a 19-year-old woman guilty Friday of filing a false police report after she said she was raped by three young men.

Even though the woman never said she lied or recanted her story, city prosecutors say they took the unusual step of filing charges against her because of the seriousness of her accusations.
snip
The woman, who was 17 at the time of the April 30, 2004, incident, testified Friday that she was attacked by an 18-year-old boyfriend and his two friends. She said she was in the boyfriend's bedroom preparing to go to a party when she was sexually assaulted by the men.

The three men testified Thursday that the acts were consensual and at the girl's initiation.

The Oregonian is not publishing the names of the woman or the three men because the case remains unresolved and involves allegations of sexual assault.

The Washington County District Attorney's Office declined to prosecute the case against the men. Robert Hermann, the county's district attorney, said prosecutors reviewed all the information and statements but didn't think they could prove a rape allegation.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now there is one giant leap backward for assault victims
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe the girl did something stupid and
decided to use the law to her own means to assuage her shame. I did say Maybe.

Ted Naemura, the assistant city attorney who prosecuted the case, said the woman's false accusations were serious enough to lead to charges. The young men faced prison sentences of at least 7 years and a lifetime labeled as sex offenders. In addition, police spent considerable resources investigating the accusations.


The three young men being labeled as sex offenders for life and 7 years in prison is a pretty serious result from teenage sexual horseplay.

I do think charging her is pushing the envelope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. At the end of the article a good point is made
by a former prosecutor. States that he can understand that there wasn't enough evidence - and not enough consistency in stories to prosecute rape - but those same factors make it hard to understand how the da could then turn around and bring charges against the girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. the real injustice is that she'll serve only a maximum of 30 days in jail
Edited on Sun Dec-04-05 01:12 PM by NorthernSpy
The people she accused would have gotten at least 7-year minimum terms, and they'd have had to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.

Even so, 30 days jailtime is better than nothing. Usually, we let such liars off scot-free. That needs to stop. It's deplorable that there are no real consequences for making a false accusation.



(edit: fixed typo)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. This story doesn't have enough info.
but it seems girl was found guilty based on the belief by the judge that the boys' stories were more "believable" and the girls friends didn't think she appeared traumatized. This seems a silly reason to convict someone. Guess I have to be carefull, because I can take huge amount of stress and pressure without anyone being aware of it, but then I'm a guy, and maybe their won't be any sexual stereotypes that I would have to have some kind of emotional breakdown, or I'm lying about being traumatized.

The article states that there were inconsistencies between all four stories. One would expect the girl's story not to match the boys' stories, as it is unlikely they would admit to rape, even if they had done it. It seems to me, the fact that the boys' stories being inconsistent with each other is a major indicator that the boys are lying.

The judge seems to be largly a corporate, technology lawyer, I have questions on his suitability for the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hello. The girl was 17 at the time. It's a crime regardless of whether
or not it was consensual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Believe what you may
But a long life of experience can say that maybe one act of non consensual sex, out of more than a thousand, is ever reported! The odds have never been in favor of the one raped to be able to prove unless they were killed! Males still go with the thought that they are right and have all rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Oregon Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC