|
legal, when most establishments offer "smoking and non-smoking" areas. I also feel that those who wish to have other establishments "smoke free" (especially bars, dance clubs, bowling alleys, pool halls, etc.), that they should open their own "smoke free" version and see how business goes.
I am allergic to smoke. I prefer to sit in non-smoking areas. But I don't understand why an establishment needs to exclude someone totally (and don't tell me they can just "go outside" -- that's not always feasible).
I've seen in Toledo clubs, like RagTime Ricks -- which had been around for over 20 years close because of the ban there. I know there were a lot of other establishments affected, too.
Here in Cincinnati, they are talking about one that is sweeping (currently bars and clubs and restaurants are exempt). If Ohio goes totally "smoke free" -- it's only a hop, skip and jump away to go to Covington Kentucky for entertainment. Our already depressed downtown (because of the riots several years ago), would completely die.
I think any city which established a total ban should look to neighboring areas to see if they lost customers to other establishments where there is no ban. Toledo is close to Michigan, and they did lose business, not necessarily to Michigan, but to places where they could still smoke. There is a group of people contemplatig making the WHOLE STATE of Ohio smoke free in public spaces as well as restaurants and bars, which does not seem fair to me at all. Those of us on the border of States who are NOT smoke free will suffer the most.
|