Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St Paul Rep. Betty McCullom continues to say she will vote for 33 Billion more for Afghan Occupation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 10:46 PM
Original message
St Paul Rep. Betty McCullom continues to say she will vote for 33 Billion more for Afghan Occupation
Edited on Tue May-18-10 10:56 PM by annm4peace
As 75 people protest in and out of Betty McCollum's office to impress upon her to vote against 33 billion more dollars to continue the death and destruction in Afghanistan.

Several were arrested.

How ironic, that the 1000 troop in Afghanistan was killed.. and will more women and children.

This is a sad milestone and another reminder to the peace community that we must continue speaking out against this horrendous war.

Congress will soon vote on a $33 billion supplemental funding bill for the U.S. war in Afghanistan. The funds will be used to escalate the war, including an attack this summer on the Afghan city of Kandahar.

we would appreciate your calling her office at 651-224-9191 or 202-225-6631.

Here are some of the personal responses from those at the event:

"we were given tickets and released. all in all it was a 3 1/2 hour protest. the obnoxious part her aide was soo patronizing and McCullom refused to speak to us on the phone. we used to get much better treatment from Sen. Coleman's office!"










So why do we keep voting for Democrats ?????

Shameful.

1. The invasion and 8-year occupation of the sovereign state of Afghanistan are immoral and contrary to international law.
2. Seventy-five percent of Afghans support an Afghan political solution without outside interference; Afghans will never accept an occupation, which aims at increasing U.S. military and political domination in the region.
3. The escalation of U.S. troops will cause increasing numbers of civilian casualties, exacerbate the plight of the Afghan people, and undercut diplomacy and development.
4. The war is spreading to Pakistan, which is leading to a dangerous destabilization in the region and increased hostility toward the U.S.
5. There is no military solution to terrorism.
6. The presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan fuels the conflict; withdrawal of U.S. troops would result in a decrease in conflict and the other horrors of war.
7. Endless wars deprive the U.S. of funds to provide for domestic needs -- investment in the infrastructure, jobs, health care, education, housing, and environmental protection.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4jHk92HyXo&feature=player_embedded
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. "We used to get much better treatment from Sen. Coleman's office!"
Wow, that's one helluva quote. Very telling.

It doesn't surprise me that McCollum was too chickenshit to speak to you guys on the phone. The way she sees it, Saint Paul is so heavily Dem that her seat is a lock so she figures she can do whatever the hell she wants. I can only hope the voters prove her wrong this time around. We really need a third party candidate to run for her seat. McCollum needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Coleen Rowley Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Betty is a big fan of the "targeted strikes by pilotless drone aircraft"
I didn't realize that Betty McCollum had turned into such a war hawk! On April 9, 2010, Betty wrote this unbelievably off-base rationalization for the illegal drone bombing of Pakistan:

"To confront this threat, intelligence cooperation between U.S. and Pakistani militaries is improving. Unfortunately, the ability and willingness of Pakistani forces to identify and eliminate al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders within their borders has been inconsistent. Until the Government of Pakistan demonstrates the capacity and will to confront the threat, the U.S. is compelled to take necessary action to protect U.S. interests, particularly U.S. service members and civilians. Those actions include targeted strikes against terrorist and enemy leaders carried out by pilotless drone aircraft. The success of this strategy was highlighted when CIA Director Leon Panetta recently told the Washington Post that operations in Pakistan's tribal areas are "seriously disrupting al-Qaeda. We have them on the run."

That last line sounds so similar to Dick Cheney's crazy pronouncement about the Iraqis being "in their last throes" when in fact U.S. casualties were peaking, doesn't it?! It also sounds similar to General Westmoreland and Robert MacNamara's constant rosy predictions during the Vietnam War when they privately were saying just the opposite. How could Betty not see she's repeating this sad history?

How come the politicians don't seem to care anymore about the people they were elected to represent? Is it 9 years of war fever that has made them all lose their integrity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MNmom Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even a Pentagon report released a couple weeks ago
admitted there had been little progress the last six months in Afghanistan - "despite enormous expenditures of effort, money and lives by the American and international forces".

Of course, they don't mention the Afghan lives.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC