it's interesting that those rules make numerous mentions about just plain old delegates; they make several references to "certified" delegates; but they make one very clear and specific reference to "elected" delegates when addressing the issue about petitioning "after the deadline" to be included on the convention ballot ... Roosevelt, the guy who shouted down a member of the audience at the last convention and displayed incredible arrogance in doing so, is the guy who "interpreted" the rules ... i wonder which candidate he's supporting??
i also read that very unprofessional post by Cyndi Roy ... nice attitude, eh? "enough is enough" sounds a little like "how dare you peons question us" ...
she can't be very good ... look at the second post she made on the blogspot page you cited ... i wonder if she's ever considered proofreading her work ... anyone can make a mistake but to leave this on the homepage of the blog since Feb. 6 is pretty poor ... Cyndi wrote:
Turnout was phenomenal- an estimated 35,000 Democrats particiapted in their communities.
to be sure, there are more important issues here than mere proofreading errors but a pro just shouldn't make errors like that ... perhaps the tone and poor reasoning of her comments on the Gabrieli debacle are to be expected ...