It must have been overwhelming. Only one giving a rah rah! (at least on the on-line edition.
Showing on today's page:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/ Search:
Voice of the People
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only Republicans
Why even bother trying to explain your endorsement of President Bush? The Tribune would endorse a dead chicken for president if it were running Republican.
Bad endorsement
Cowardly. That is my description of the Tribune's endorsement of George W. Bush for president (Editorial, Oct. 17).
Tribune actions
The only thing more predictable than the Cubs losing is the Tribune's endorsement of a Republican for president. The spirit of Colonel McCormick lives on.
Foolish pick
Shame on you, Tribune, for being fooled twice.
Bad choice
I have always thought, and relied upon, the local newspaper's ability to digest facts and transmit reasonable information based on such facts. Such practices are a clear sign of editorial intelligence. For four years, Americans have been paralyzed by a president unable to make intelligent decisions based on factual knowledge. The consequences have been, and will continue to be, catastrophic. How can we endorse a newspaper that supports such a grossly unintelligent president, and uniquely dishonest administration?
Best choice
Finally you have come to your senses and are backing the president in his re-election bid.