|
(i thought there were only 2!) i would back, although he named them, he didn't call them dems. obviously, he already knew that i am a registered dem. then he asked which i would choose between greene and meek. he asked if i would definitely vote meek. he asked a couple more questions like that before i asked him again what his polling company name was and i asked if greene had hired them, since it did not appear that he was going to be the subject of any of the poll questions. of course, the pollster/surveyor was just the person asking the questions, and professed not to know, so i let him continue. that's when the questions became more specific . . . 'how likely would i vote for meek if i was told that a donor had given money to meek's mom and bought her a car', something similar to that. he asked another question in a similar vein and i wondered what things he was going to tell me about greene when i realized he wasn't going to give greene equal time and that he was trying to influence me about meek.
i cut him off then, accused him of push-polling me to which he answered , 'if that's what you think, yes'. i politely ended the call.
i might have been more compliant if he had not started by calling me 'sir' and then asking if there was a male registered voter in the house . . . after calling the phone number that is in my (female) name. :eyes:
ellen fl
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
