Am I the only one that remembers reading a thread last night.....

[TheDebbieDee]

about Freepers attempting to skew all the "Who won the Debate?" polls by voting for Edwards, too? :shrug:

[soothsayer]

1. there were a lot of those threads. I never understood the logic. n/t

[apnu]

2. no i read it too...

and I read the freeprer thread cited in the post as well, much to my distain.

Doesn't seem to have helped them much does it?

[leftofthedial]

3. I even started a thread about that

I read a thread over in idiotville that advocated that.

Basically they said they knew they couldn't win the polls because the "leftists" would be out in force like they (we) were for the 1st Presidential debate. So the poster suggested voiting for Edwards in order to make the polls so preposterous that even the "librul" media would disocunt them.

[Vincardog]

4. I saw that thread. The spin was that Freepers would vote Edwards and

prove the results were wrong because they were so lopsided. I believe they wanted us to counter their spin by voting for Cheney.
IMHO :crazy:

[girl gone mad]

5. I'm certain it was just a ploy...

to try and convince the media that Edwards good showing in the polls was all due to freepers padding the vote.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

6. Guess it didn't work since their guy told some whoppers

Freepers need to learn that only the top 1% of cheaters prosper..once again they voted against their own interests...it's becoming a habit :evilgrin:

[nostalgicaboutmyfutr]

7. Here is one..

I started it last night...but not many responses:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=982463&mesg_id=982463

[nostalgicaboutmyfutr]

8. What gets me

is they HAD TIME to plan and get ready and freep but they did so miserably...they even had to steal the DU list to get them started....