WP: This is weird (VP Debate Analysis dated Oct 6, 2004)

[Xipe Totec]

Washington Post has an article titled "Boasts and Bluster in the Ground War" If you go to the second page and scroll down, you'll see a link to and article by Robert G. Kaiser on Vice Presidential Debate Analysis dated (Oct. 6, 2004; 10:00 AM)

Another ESP moment?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4553-2004Oct3_2.html

PS - I'm having trouble with the link, it keeps sending me to the registration page instead, but here's another way to get to it:

From Yahoo got to top stories from Washington Post, select "Debate Assumes New Importance". From there click "Swing State: Boasts and Bluster in the Ground War" then go to second page to see link to "Robert G. Kaiser on Vice Presidential Debate Analysis dated (Oct. 6, 2004; 10:00 AM)"

[JI7]

1. AP did this with the Pres candidates debate also

[Junkdrawer]

2. It's an advertisement for a real time chat with Robert Kaiser...

Vice Presidential Debate Analysis
Robert G. Kaiser
Washington Post Associate Managing Editor
Wednesday, October 06, 2004; 10:00 a.m. ET

Tuesday night Vice President Cheney and Sen. John Edwards face off in their only debate. Who came out ahead? How did the strict format influence the event? Were the candidate's accurate in their statements?

Kaiser will be online Wednesday, Oct. 6, at 10 a.m. ET to take your questions, comments and analysis on the debate, the candidates and the 2004 election.

http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/04/kaiser_100604.htm

[Xipe Totec]

6. Thanks for the link!

I could not navigate to it myself (kept sending me to the registration page) but I was able to see it using your link.

:hi:

[GimmeDANEger]

3. it's nothing

Vice Presidential Debate Analysis
Robert G. Kaiser
Washington Post Associate Managing Editor
Wednesday, October 06, 2004; 10:00 a.m. ET

Tuesday night Vice President Cheney and Sen. John Edwards face off in their only debate. Who came out ahead? How did the strict format influence the event? Were the candidate's accurate in their statements?

Kaiser will be online Wednesday, Oct. 6, at 10 a.m. ET to take your questions, comments and analysis on the debate, the candidates and the 2004 election.

[trotsky]

4. It looks like that is a link for a live discussion.

Here's what you get when you are registered:

Vice Presidential Debate Analysis
Robert G. Kaiser
Washington Post Associate Managing Editor
Wednesday, October 06, 2004; 10:00 a.m. ET

Tuesday night Vice President Cheney and Sen. John Edwards face off in their only debate. Who came out ahead? How did the strict format influence the event? Were the candidate's accurate in their statements?

Kaiser will be online Wednesday, Oct. 6, at 10 a.m. ET to take your questions, comments and analysis on the debate, the candidates and the 2004 election.

Submit your questions and comments before or during the discussion.

[sldavis]

5. not an article

I think it's just a link to the site for a live post-debate discussion scheduled for 10/6, not really an article yet.

[Machiavelli05]

7. NO!

Its some sort of conspiracy

[Xipe Totec]

8. LOL!

Why isn't there a smiley for "my face is red"?

Oh, well, this will have to do for now: :spank: