Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This new "Dean is a liar" campaign reminds me of 2000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:46 AM
Original message
This new "Dean is a liar" campaign reminds me of 2000
The "Gore is a liar" campaign in 2000 was so charming. Scouring all statements that a candidate has ever made, then trying to find some inconsistency is "so Karl Rove".

Watching Democrats join this attack of the frontrunner for the nomination is so lovely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carl21014 Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't the media appy the same standard to Bush?
They could dedicate hours and hours to the lies he's told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If they had done that in 2000.........
Gore would have had 60% of the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. the difference is gore wasn't a certified liar like dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. the situations are identical
This "contraversy" is about as meaningful as any of the attacks on Gore in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Dean is no more a liar then Gore or anyone else.
But please , by all , means show us a link to the copy of the certification. I wasn't even aware there was such a thing.

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. prove it
waiting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Who's "closest living relative in the armed services?'" Dean: my brother
http://www.steveverdon.com/archives/2003_12.html

Looks like Dean got caught trying to pass a civilian family member off as a member of the Armed Services. In responding to a question about who was "his closest living relative in the armed services is....?" Dean responded that his brother is listed as MIA/POW in Laos.

The only problem is that Charlie Dean was never in the military and the newspaper accounts of his disappearance in Laos refer to him as a tourist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. He responded that his brother was listed as POW/MIA, which is true.
The DoD did designate Charlie Dean as a POW/MIA, although probably only a tourist there.

Dean's point, which you obviously missed, is that although he has no living relatives in the armed services, his brother suffered capture, imprisonment, torture, and death -- the worst experiences an actual service member can endure.

Nice link, by the way. It's not the actual interview of Dean making that statement, but rather a blog quoting another blog paraphrasing Dean. It would be nice to see Dean's actual comment in context, considering the hatchet jobs done on his statements lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. He was a tourist. How can you be MIA/POW when you're a tourist....
He said his brother was a member of the armed forces....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. He was classified a missing civilian.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:51 AM by SahaleArm
It's amazing how many people confuse civilian missing/pow's with armed service MIA/POW's. The classification makes a clear distinction, he was a civilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. A civilian regardless of how they died is not in the armed forces.
Dean should have left it blank.

Dean's point, which you obviously missed, is that although he has no living relatives in the armed services, his brother suffered capture, imprisonment, torture, and death -- the worst experiences an actual service member can endure.

Most of this is speculation, like being in the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
71. plus we don't even know if he was actually a prisoner or
the manner of his death? snakebite? tiger attack? malaria? dysentary?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
52. Dean: I am the only candidate against the war.
Lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. He said "major" candidate
At 2 percent in the polls, Dennis isn't so much "major."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #56
74. He was FOR the same use of force
to be used in B-L that was in the IWR.

Dean was NOT antiwar as he labeled himself, and nor were the others prowar as labeled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
77. Lie?
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 04:54 PM by Sean Reynolds
Hardly. EVERY candidate says the I'm the only candidate here that ________. I was listening to a town hall last night and Gephardt said he was the only candidate with a health care plan that works. Should we call him a liar too? What about when Kucinich at the NPR debate said he was the only candidate that wanted the UN in and the US out? Last I checked Sharpton wanted the same thing. Would you say Kucinich was a liar? When Kerry says he is the only candidate that has a fair tax plan, is he lying? No. Of course not because it's just politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. proof?
Anything besides your opinion? Now's a good opportunity to achieve some credibilty, hope you'll run with that....

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
37. Examples would be useful
Do we only want candidates who emerged from the womb as fully formed Democratic candidates?

Inconsistencies and lies are not the same thing. The intent involved (or lack thereof) is entirely different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
80. You'll no doubt be sorely disappointed...
When the candidate of your choice also cannot live up to the lofty standard of consistency and perfection in their every utterance for time immemorial you have set down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
82. This was repeated for some reason
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 06:58 PM by Tweedtheatre
Check out the post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
83. Yeah, it's pretty sad
I think the reason they don't do it is because it is too easy. I mean after awhile it just becomes expected. I think that when Bush lies, "Most people think, oh isn't that the thing that he does?" Such a sad state our country is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. same tactics same players
I guess the aol message boards got boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. oh i get it now! .........this is the post-gaffe-hug thread
where we all hug and say in unison:
i'm ok
we're ok
dean's ok
and everyone who doesn't love dean is a poopyhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I wish I had an idea of what you were talking about
:shrug:

Do you think I want you to hug me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is a reason that I have stopped listening to Kerry, Gep and Lieberman
Jump on to Roves lap and say so and so is a liar

damn fools
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm Waiting for "Dean is an Angry Liar"
That won't work, either, but it does nicely combine two meaningless ideas.

I don't know in real life a single Dan supporter who gets knicker-twist from Dean's supposed lies. What I do know is he has never wavered on the issues I find most important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. lie to me....i promise i'll believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I Really Enjoy Your Posts and Think You're Swell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. hee hee
good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sventvkg Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is the Damn liar!!! Why doesn't Dean just come out and say that?
Counter their crap with fact after fact after fact that exposes Bush for the Lying Chimp that he is.......Dems better start using Rovian Techniques aimed right back at Rove, if they hope to have a chance...There are no rules in WAR....The ROVE knows it...DEAN Needs to give them a dose of their on medicine and make it actually true statements..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL - The self-pity card followed by calling everyone else a Repug?
Dean supporters are nothing if not consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. If you agree with these tactics....
Go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. LOL the Card card
what is it with you guys and accusing someone of playing a "card"? IS that your last refuge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Stop it you're killing me...
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:22 AM by SahaleArm
Are you going to call me a Republican next? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. I asked a simple question
what does that have to do with being republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. Thread topic paints anyone who questions Dean's veracity a Republican n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
44. no it doesn't n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Actually it's "Gaffes" they accuse Dean of, not so much lies
It wasn't a lie when he said the Iowa caucus system was dominated by special interests. Hell every American political system is.

It wasn't a lie when Dean said Gore was not quick on his feet. Lord knows Gore took his time responding to all those inaccurate charges against him.

It wasn't a lie when Dean said he wanted to be the candidate of southerners with a rebel flag on their truck. Rather, it politically awkward and inexpedient. Hell, that line got him a standing ovation at the DNC Winter Meeting last February, black audience members and Terry McAuliffe included!

Look at almost any Dean "flap," and the issue isn't that he was untruthful, but un-PC and un-CW.

His crime is that he's not sticking to the same politically safe, meaningless pablum that most other candidates spew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajabr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Dean Campaign is going to the mattresses
Full assault on the WHORE Media...

Luca Trippi claims his first victim - Paula Zahn:

http://blog.deanforamerica.com/archives/003053.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Mattresses? Is the campaign going to sleep? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Wrestling Term
I am assuming this was an honest misinterpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Sarcasm - Usually stated 'going to the mat' n/t
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:28 AM by SahaleArm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajabr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Unlees you're watching The Godfather
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Sh*t you got me...
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:33 AM by SahaleArm
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Ah, A Spelling Flame
I stand corrected and apologize for the misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
47. Actually, it doesn't -
it means when the gangsters are fighting among themselves, they hole up in a temporary place, away from their homes. I guess they throw mattresses on the floor for temporary beds - I think I got that from the Godfather, could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. Exactly
People here are clowning like the press did in 2000, and using press clowns like Peggy Noonan to support their assertions.

If we didn't learn anything from 2000, we're going to repeat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. It's a slander to Gore to compare him to Dean's lying.
That's the stunner, folks - the media aren't making ANYTHING up with Dean. He's not being mis-quoted, mis-interpreted.

THESE ARE HIS OWN WORDS.

Yes, Bush lies. But why should we put up our own flip-side version of George Walker Bush.

Howard Brush Dean III.

Dean lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. that must be why Gore endorsed him and is campaigning for him
if you feel good about this line of attack, more power to you.

They used Gore's words as well, and the issues were of the same incredibly minor significance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. Dean is being hammered not for lying but telling the truth.
It wasn't a lie that the caucus system is dominated by special interests. It is.

It wasn't a lie that Al Gore is sometimes slow on his feet. He is.

It wasn't a lie that we're no safer since the capture of Saddam. We aren't.

It wasn't a lie that he wants to be candidate of southerns with rebel flags on their trucks. Politically awkward, yes. Lie, no.

It wasn't a lie when he said we should take a more even-handed approach to the Middle East. A departure from 60 years of failed policy, yes. Lie, no.

It wasn't a lie when he said he is the only major candidate to oppose the war. At 2 percent in the polls, Dennis isn't "major."

Need I go on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
50. There you go folks
Another soul lost to the ghost of elections past.

They talk about lies but they don't demonstrate them. Nary a legitimate argument between them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. Dean: "I've never favored Social Security retirement at the age of 70"
Whoops! Maybe I did.....

http://slate.msn.com/id/2086804/

"Dennis Kucinich: y good friend, Mr. Dean, has said that he'd move the retirement age to 68. One time he talked about moving it to 70.

-snip-

"I'm not going to go back and ask you to change the rules, but I think I'll take 20 seconds just to tell everybody that I have never favored Social Security retirement at the age of 70, nor do I favor one of 68."


—AFL-CIO Democratic presidential candidate forum, Aug. 5, 2003

"Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.): I've said many times that I think we should raise the retirement age about the year 2015—raise it by that time to about age 70.

<…>

"Howard Dean: I am very pleased to hear Bob Packwood because I absolutely agree we need to reduce the—I mean, to increase the retirement age. There will be cuts and losses of some benefits, but I believe that Sen. Packwood is on exactly the right track."

—CNN's Crossfire, Feb. 28, 1995

"The way to balance the budget, Dean said, is for Congress to cut Social Security, move the retirement age to 70, cut defense, Medicare and veterans pensions, while the states cut almost everything else. 'It would be tough but we could do it,' he said."

—News story on a breakfast meeting Dean held with reporters by Miles Benson, Newhouse News Service, March 3, 1995

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. DU deserves a thread chronicling Dean's lies. With links.
Would that be flamebait? It shouldn't. Because we've GOT to look at this now, rather than when it's too late.

Medicare, his military service, his brother's military service, Nafta, Iowa Caucuses.

The lies, the flip flops. You can bet Karl Rove is keeping a detailed list. With links. And video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #34
45. And he corrected himself a couple of days after he made that comment.
You're being dishonest by omitting that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #45
64. PLease tell us about how he corrected himself!
Do tell....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
63. Excellent! This needs to have its own thread!
I have updated my www.mylinuxisp.com/~cryofan/dean.html page with this information. Let's see them try to rebut this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. Dean" I never said the ends don't justify the needs (Re; Uday and Qusay)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
46. Dean: I never said Bush was forewarned about 911. Whoops! Guess I did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. is Gore really your President? n/t
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:59 AM by virtualobserver
I'm curious.

Because your President endorsed Howard Dean (because he is a liar?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. Yep. He's just politically expedient. He needs Dean supporters for 2008
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #58
61. boy, what a cynical guy Gore must be.....
in your estimation.


Jeez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. He's a poltician... playing poltics. Just like Dean is. I'm not naive.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #46
57. Oh, come on.
You're being just as bad as those media whores who repeated that Gore claimed that he invented the Internet, when he said no such thing. This is what Dean said on the Rehm show:

The most interesting theory that I've heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't—think it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now, who knows what the real situation is, but the trouble is that by suppressing that kind of information, you lead to those kinds of theories, whether they have any truth to them or not, and then eventually they get repeated as fact.

Do you know what theory means? Shall I post the definition? I don't think you're interested in the truth, you're only interested in spreading half-truths, remarks taken out of context, all the latest talking points. It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
48. Yes , inconsistency is not actually lying.
Saying your civilian brother was in the military is however. Imagine what Rove is going to do with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. or what Rove will do with Clark's statement on IWR
one day he would probably have voted for it.....the next day he never would have.

You don't think that Rove would have a field day with that?

Every one has inconsistent statements in politics, and no one is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. Clark has written over 250,000 words
If you would bother to read some of them you would find consistency. He stated he would have voted for a resolution that would have required a return to congress with proof that the war was justified. The resolution was to be used as a bargaining chip. If Rove had anything he would put it out now since he is a self-proclaimed Dean supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. That's ONE thing. Dean has hundreds of these mistruths.
All candidates will have a "gotcha" but Dean just has waaaay too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
49. "I never said Saddam was a danger to the United States. Ever" Whoops!
I guess I did.....


www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6147-2003Dec16.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
65. Link and "statement" make no sense.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
51. The problem is
if it is so easy for Dems to do it, Dean is toast. That's one of the things that make Dean a bad nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. It is always easy
to blow supposed inconsistencies out of proportion.

But it won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
66. What bothers me more is his "hypocracy" and lack of integrity
He berates other people for being "corporate whores" and "bush-lite" when he is truly the worst out of all of the candididates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Truly the worst
One whole sentence. No actual claims, no evidence, not even a criterion for being the worst. Just the claim. The old stick and move. And this is what passes for meaningful discourse at DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. This is called "Gore-ing" a candidate.
That the person who believes Gore is the president doesn't pick up on this is a little suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. Dean "Gored" Kerry with the help of the media.
He completely labeled Kerry as a corrupt Washington insider and "Bushlite"....knowing full well that he was far to Kerry's right on most issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
69. "ONLY DEAN OPPOSED THE WAR FROM THE START"
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 03:54 PM by ThirdWheelLegend
or "All my supporters could do ... before they supported the war."

Oh, I don't have the full quote of that, but he NEVER used the word "major". Only supporters who insisted on describing what he really meant used the word 'major'.

There are two. The point that these 'lies' are also being used for ADVANTAGE in the race is the worst part of it. No Dean is not a crazy lying fool, but he is a candidate for PRESIDENT of the United States. Just because Dubya is so bad, are we to lower our standards on an issue like this?

TWL


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. And, he's the ONLY one talking about race to white people.
I'm telling you, this goes beyond pandering and exaggerating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
70. Reality's a bitch
Dean may not be an out and out liar, but neither are the people who are saying he's made way way too many outrageous statements and flip-flops. He can't be our nominee, he just can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. Well he just will be our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
73. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
76. I realized Dean was a misleader....
....over a year ago. It's not new to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
79. Dean causes crediblity problems for himself. Why did he even bring up the
"Saudi warned Bush about 9/11" conspiracy theory? It just made him look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FubarFly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
81. Bush is a lair!
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 07:00 PM by FubarFly
And he's a dirty, warmongering, jackass, phychonimrod to boot.

Relatively speaking, Dean should be canonized for his integrity.

Pointing out media hypocrisy will be a job I will relish in this upcoming year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC