Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FIVE Southern Senate Seats. Our nominee has to help keep them.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:36 AM
Original message
FIVE Southern Senate Seats. Our nominee has to help keep them.
We have to have someone at the top of the ticket who can help us in Senate races around the country - especially in the South, where those seats are highly vulnerable.

As we select our nominee, we must take into consideration everything that is at stake. We could lose the one weapon our Senators have used to block *'s right-wing, LIFE TERM, federal judicial appointments - the power to filibuster.

Over the next four years, 3-4 Supreme Court justices could retire - 2 of them almost immediately.

We're not just settling on a candidate to run for President right now. We are deciding the fate of the Senate, of the judiciary, of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aunt Eunice Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is the only one..
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 08:39 AM by Aunt Eunice
..with a chance of helping hold onto to Senate seats in the South. (although his own seat is at risk in NC)

We just love that boy down here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Edwards might be the one. Or Clark. Or both of them.
A Clark/Edwards or Edwards/Clark ticket could save us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 09:15 AM by gulliver
I agree with you that Clark/Edwards would be tremendous in the South.

I think a Clark/Edwards ticket would be strong enough to have coattails, not just in the South but throughout the United States. As presidential material, Clark so far outshines Bush that I think he could develop a wave of national enthusiasm for Democrats. Then, as if the picture of Clark debating Bush isn't encouraging enough, add to it a debate or two between Edwards and Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well there are 7 northern senate seats too and a handful
that might be called western.

I guess the point is that picking the best candidates for the nation will provide the most support to senatorial candidates regardless of where they are running.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Coattails dont' count for much
The nominees and their state parties have to keep them, at the end of the day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Name one candidate who has actually and actively raised money for D's
running for office. Name one candidate who has made his entire campaign model FREE to any D that wants to use it? Name on candidate who made a 25,000 dollar donation to the Florida D party.


Dean, Dean, Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. I do not like to be a pessimist,
but I don't see any Dem candidate that can help in the South for these Senate seats. Despite the general opinion on this board, Southerners are not stupid, and having been burned twice by southern Democrats (I'm speaking here from what I think is the majority Southern viewpoint, not my own)they will be hesistant to vote for another one. Especially as they have a Southerner (from Texas) running on the Republican side.

The days of split ticket voting are over. But let's say that the Dems can win the WH without a single southern state. There will be payback for the filibusters. No Dem president is going to get liberal judges on any courts from now on. I can see a time when the last surviving federal judge is making all the political decisions for this country.

Well, we have our work cut out for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC