Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trippi: "Likely target, Bush debate attack: Kerry's "no" vote, Gulf War 1"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:31 AM
Original message
Trippi: "Likely target, Bush debate attack: Kerry's "no" vote, Gulf War 1"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5445086/

The likely target for George Bush to launch his attack will be John Kerry’s “NO” vote against Gulf War I.

In an attempt to further question Kerry’s ability to lead, and to further depict Kerry as a flip-flopper, George Bush will likely ask Kerry to square his vote in opposition to Gulf War I with this vote in support of Gulf War II.

Bush will use the specter of Saddam’s Army crashing through Kuwait, massing on the Saudi Arabian border, his willingness to launch Scud missile attacks on Israel, multinational support, and troops from Muslim countries on the frontlines and ask Kerry why when Saddam was visibly such an imminent threat at the time that even Al Gore and Howard Dean supported Gulf War I – the Senator from Massachusetts opposed it.

I have a deep respect for John Kerry’s debating skills but as Frank Rich said on MSNBC’s Hardball show when Chris Mathews asked him this same question “John Kerry better have a damn good answer to that question.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. And here's proof we needed more time before Gulf War I
the Kuwaiti oil wells were not secured and were allowed to be torched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kerry's response: Our national security was not at issue in 1991.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I posted this theory the other day
because if Kerry attacks Bush for not building a coalition, Bush will come back with Kerrys no vote on Gulf War I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. So what would your response be to that if you were Kerry?
Assuming Joe Trippi is right, and the question is "make-or-break."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. I really don t know what a good answer is.
J17 started a thread the other day, asking what Bush would use against Kerry in the debates, & I posted that because I see it as a problem.

Kerry can say that Bush Senior exaggerated the situation, or that he wanted more time for diplomacy, but Hussein had invaded Iraq.

Quite honestly, I believe Kerrys honest impulse is to vote against using military force, but on Iraq this time, he voted politically.

If I was a Senator, I would have voted yes on Gulf War I & no on IWR, the exact opposite of Kerrys vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sidenote: Massing on the saudi border?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 09:41 AM by WillW
Funny how there are two different satellite photos of this alleged occurance that tell different stories. Maybe Bush could bring up the babies being thrown out of their incubators onto the floor by the Iraqi troops, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio-Active Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. "babies thrown out of the incubators"
I'm sure you realized this.. but that was a lie used for great propaganda effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Whoop right over the head
You do realize he was talking about the "Massing at the Saudi border" as also being a big propaganda LIE as well. That was the reason the babies were even mentioned. If one lie is to be brought up why not some of the other one's as well like the babies being thrown out of incubators. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio-Active Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. thanks, I had not heard about this..
will do a search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Sorry, my sarcasm sometimes gets in the way...
..of my clarity. Yes, I was referring to the saudi border as yet another line of propaganda fed to us by the war pigs in the Bush I admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. all Kerry has to say is the flip/flop bush I did
First he had our ambassodor to Iraq tell Saddam we wouldn't do anything thing if they invaded Kuwaitt, then when they started to, the whole bush administration suddently changed their minds

In addition, it was bush I along with Cheneny and PNAC who helped arm Saddam with weapons that were used to kill Shiites and Kurds in Iraq

Kerry's main reason for voting no at that time was because he wanted to give diplomacy more of a chance to work

As far as those talking heads on hardball, maybe their children will get a chance to see Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. April Glaspie was the "diplomat" or should I say "messenger" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kerry's position is consistent
The vote regarding Gulf War was for war. The recent vote was to autorize the President to essentially make plans for war - strengthening the hand of the President. Two entirely different resolutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio-Active Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. YES!
this would be a great opportunity for Kerry to clarify what the vote for IWR really was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush I Earned Kerry's Respect By Putting Together A Real Military Campaign
He misguidedly used that respect with Bush II, who literally couldn't have done a worse job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry needs to hit shrub with PNAC and the scandals
His team have been part of. He has hit these issues hard and often. Hell, no one is talking about any of it and it's at the core of why we went into Iraq.

I still shake my head in disbelief over this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kerry is truly a RELUCTANT WARRIOR. Sadly, folks want a vicious killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. i called this one
i wanted kerry to get ahead of it and define himself before bushco did

people dont know shit about kerry. this is going to confuse them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. my cousin vinny
this is all vinnie.

didnt trust them in '91. k they did it. i learned. i will trust bush to do the same.........f*ck he f* up. go figure. now gotta fix the stuff. maybe it was bush 1 holding to a promise to the world not to invade iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. From The New Republic
http://www.thenewrepublic.com/etc.mhtml?pid=1261

"Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition ... to the early use of military force by the US against Iraq. I share your concerns. On January 11, I voted in favor of a resolution that would have insisted that economic sanctions be given more time to work and against a resolution giving the president the immediate authority to go to war."

--letter from Senator John Kerry to Wallace Carter of Newton Centre, Massachusetts, dated January 22 <1991>

"Thank you very much for contacting me to express your support for the actions of President Bush in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. From the outset of the invasion, I have strongly and unequivocally supported President Bush's response to the crisis and the policy goals he has established with our military deployment in the Persian Gulf."

--Senator Kerry to Wallace Carter, January 31 <1991>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. in other words.........
we shouldnt go in right now

now that we did go in, bush 1 has my full support

that is not something to shy away from. that is cool. he can stand on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bush better have a damn good response to why he let Bin-Laden
off the hook to divert the worlds attention to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Your last opponent, Al Gore, voted for the GWI resolution...
...yet you still accused him in your ads of being soft on defense."

"Let's talk about issues that matter to our troops Now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC