Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

time to resurrect the National Women's Party!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:53 PM
Original message
time to resurrect the National Women's Party!!
(when asked my party affiliation, this is always my answer)

we know the repukes don't give a damn about women's rights, and we have had clear evidence again this weekend that we cannot count on the dems either. so, is it time to resurrect the national women's party, or something similar? and, what should be the platform?

here are my first ones:

ratification of ERA (for which we have been waiting since 1923)
wage parity
end the iraq and afghanistan occupations
universal health care


a brief history of the National Women's Party:



NWP members picket the White House in 1917, the banner reads, "Mr. President How Long Must Women Wait For Liberty."The National Woman's Party (NWP), was a women's organization founded in 1916 that fought for women's rights during the early 20th century in the United States, particularly for the right to vote on the same terms as men. In contrast to other organizations, such as the National American Woman Suffrage Association, which focused on lobbying individual states and from which the NWP split, the NWP put its priority on the passage of a constitutional amendment ensuring women's suffrage. Alice Paul and Lucy Burns founded the organization originally under the name the Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage in 1913; by 1917, the name had been changed to the National Women's Party.

During the group's first meeting, Paul clarified that the party would not be a political party and therefore would not name a candidate for United States president during elections. While non-partisan, the NWP directed much of its fire at President Woodrow Wilson when criticizing those responsible for the social situation in which women of the era lived. The National Woman's Party also opposed World War I.

Women associated with the party staged a suffrage parade on March 3, 1913, the day before Wilson's inauguration; they also became the first women to picket for women's rights in front of the White House. The picketers were tolerated until 1917, but when they continued to picket after the United States declared war in World War One, they were arrested by police for "obstructing traffic". Many of the NWP's members, upon arrest, went on hunger strikes; some, including Paul, were force-fed by jail personnel as a consequence. The resulting scandal and its negative impact on the country's international reputation at a time when Wilson was trying to build a reputation for himself and the nation as an international leader in human rights may have contributed to Wilson's decision to publicly call for the United States Congress to pass the Suffrage Amendment.

After the ratification of the Nineteenth amendment in 1920, the NWP turned its attention to eliminating other forms of gender discrimination, principally by advocating passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, which Paul drafted in 1923. The organization regrouped and published the magazine Equal Rights. The publication was directed mostly towards women but also intended to educate men about the benefits of women's suffrage, women's rights and other issues concerning American women.

Over the next several decades, the National Women's Party authored over 600 pieces of legislation fighting for women's equality; over 300 of these were passed. In addition, the NWP continued to lobby for the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment. In 1997, the NWP ceased to be a lobbying organization. Instead, it turned its focus to education and to preserving its collection of first hand source documents from the women's suffrage movement. The NWP continues to function as an educational organization and museum.

http://www.answers.com/topic/national-woman-s-party

by the way, for those of you in the DC area--the Sewall-Belmont House is the museum of the NWP--Alice Paul's residence. it is also part of the women's history walking tour.

The Sewall-Belmont House & Museum will be hosting the 2nd Annual Holiday Bazaar

Thursday, December 3, 2009

4pm-8pm

Join us for a wine and cheese reception, live entertainment, and shopping.

Stay tuned for more details!



The Sewall-Belmont House and Museum, on Capitol Hill, explores the evolving role of women and their contributions to society through the continuing, and often untold, story of women's pursuit for equality.
The museum is the headquarters of the historic National Woman's Party and was the Washington home of its founder and Equal Rights Amendment author Alice Paul.

Alice Paul, founder of the National Woman's Party, dedicated her life to securing equal rights for women. The political strategies and techniques of Alice Paul and the NWP became the blueprint for civil rights organizations during the twentieth century. Paul is known internationally as a humanitarian; she was a great revolutionary and pioneer in the fight for women's equal rights.
http://www.sewallbelmont.org/


Refresh | +15 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell, yeah!
Dems keeping acting like fuckmidgets. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where do I sign up? Add two more planks:
campaign finance reform

and universal civil rights, i.e. marriage, etc, for ALL

and we're good to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. sorry, had meant to include them--not enough caffeine.
also, verifiable paper trail ballots



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. All right!
I've been looking for a new party since Democrats have abandoned me - this might be a good idea. Where do I sign up, LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick--and finding the unrec's amusing. why so threatened, folks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. probably because DU doesn't permit the promotion of third parties
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 07:07 AM by Teaser
although as this is pretty clearly a joke, I'm sure that rule doesn't need to be enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Leo The Cleo Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is it time? And what would this party look like?
If it looks they way it looked then, then I wouldn't support it. 1917 was not a good time for black people in this country and women's group (cuz they were white women's groups) reflected the same dislike for blacks as other social organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. to those unrec'ing, WHAT, exactly, is your problem with this post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm on board
I have really had it. I e-mailed my rep, Marcy Kaptur, and gave that anti-woman idiot a piece of my mind. There are all sorts of ironies in her vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yay!
According to ancient time history when God was a Woman women were better rulers and much wiser, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC