|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:45 PM Original message |
*** House Debate on Health Care Bill *** Thread 7 |
Refresh | +9 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope Nancy doesn't let him blather on all night! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Razoor (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. quit stalling already! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. When the heck are Boner's pants gonna catch fire? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thanks for sticking with it annabanana. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I may have to fold if THIS one goes to 100. . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. so basically Boehner wants to reform health care, but doesn't want to do any of the work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
57. Like many DUers he is against any mandate to buy insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. Boehner done, Now Dingell. 5 minutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. FINALLY. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Graybeard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Rep Dingell. Standing Ovation, cheers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Dingell quoting NY Times... doesn't he know that it's a "Liberal rag?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Keeping it Kicking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. "I will not spend much time on the Republican Plan.. It is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. When did his Dad serve in Congress.. from when to when? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Dingell has been around the block |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM Original message |
And if HE says "most Americans will get a decent choice!" .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. The death of recision!. .YAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
17. Dingell- A car in Canada costs $4/hr less to make because they have UNIVERSAL health care! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. And the bill they're talking about tonight won't change that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
19. HIM I could have listened to for a little longer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Yeah, and less to the Orange Boner! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Here's the vote on the RepubliCON fecal amendment! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. On edit - I see -- it's the evil stupak amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Stupak amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. first the Stupak amendment, then the Repub substitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. And then the real big vote we've all been waiting for. Fingers crossed!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. Who are the so far 13 Democrats voting in favor of this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
22. They are going to vote on the amendments now - 15 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. FIFTEEN minutes! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Good, I need to catch up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. So much news flying - is the Stupak amendment expected to pass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kdillard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I thought it failed by voice vote. Although the rumor was that whether this failed or passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
POAS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. As a matter of standard practice someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. The compromise with Pelosi was that if she allowed a vote on it, they'd vote for the final bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Seem like it might be close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. Announcer on C-SPAN - This is representitive Cancer, er Cantor... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. freudian slip. cantor IS a cancer on the congress. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
34. Just watching the numbers flip around. . Caller thinks that AARP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. Reporter on C-Span just said a handful of Repubs. will vote "present" on Stupak bill! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. At least one will vote "present" and the anti-choicers are not happy about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Yeah-that's the guy the reporter named. I hope the Repubs. don't pressure him to change his mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. Wow, Stupak amendment getting its ass kicked so far - 101 Nay-89 Yea.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Not so fast, Speedy Gonzalez! 117 yea, 130 ney now n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. That's why I included the "so far." :) nt :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. 136-138 now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. I see Repubs have peeled off 46 Dems so far for the dark side. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. 52 now. There's now way we can win on this one. The numbers are no longer there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. The one win is that Stupak no longer has any excuse to not vote for the House bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
41. I swear I can't listen to these CSPAN callers..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Clio, no kidding sometimes it's painful to listen to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
61. I'm taking this time to watch all the broo ha ha from this morning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
charlie and algernon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. that young repub caller got owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
67. Like fingernails on a chalkboard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
45. There's 36 dems voting yea already?. . yikes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:09 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. 43 now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. I bet it passes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
48. Have any of you watching this thread called in to Cspan? Fess up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
52. Bill will pass. Dems don't have enough votes left to defeat it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Hopefully the "substitute fecal amendment" will not pass.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #52 |
62. And I bet my Blue Dog voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kdillard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. Unbelieable I am so pissed. This better get tossed in reconciliation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
73. That's Boehner's big fear. I hope it gets tossed, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
54. I hope this guy calling in to CSPAN now doesn't pay his taxes when the bill passes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
liberalmuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
55. I love watching old men decide what's best for us women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
58. that rnc caller was full of crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. I bet he got one watching the Orange Erection. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
60. Stupak passed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. wtf! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. Doesn't look good....200-173 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rusty charly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Aren't they redeciding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. No - just what your tax payer dollars will pay for.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rusty charly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
78. Unlike the Iraq War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. wouldn't it have been better if we could have opted out of taxes for Iraq as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #71 |
87. Not quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #60 |
75. Not even close. 236-190 right now with 63 f-ing dems voting yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
70. Glad we funneled all that money to the Democrats last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. If any of the ones I funded voted for this one, they will hear it for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
72. Crap, minority and poor women just got raped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #72 |
76. While I understand your anger and frustration.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. I hope it gets changed in conference! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
74. Shocked to see 63 dems (so far) vote yea on Stupak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Find out who they are, and ream them a new one! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
82. Now on to the "Republican Bill". . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
83. Five mind vote for the Boner ammendment then onto the big vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
84. FIVE minute vote on the "substitute" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
85. This should be quick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
86. WTF. A Dem voted Yea for the Boehner bill!?!?!?! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:23 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. They fixed the tally. I saw that flash too, but it's back to zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
88. Wonder who the 1 dem was who votes yea for Boner bill and then nay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:24 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. wouldn't you be sleepy at this point? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. OMG -- I would need to be all hopped up on Sudafed if I were there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
90. Boner amendment just got deflated! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BlueIdaho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #90 |
96. Flacid Member... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
fugop (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #90 |
99. Wonder if that's the Calif. rep? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
92. Is debate finished? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #92 |
97. Yessiree! They're voting now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
94. Looks like one puke voted against Boner. Might we have that vote? Interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LLStarks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
95. Oooh. A GOP dissenter. Is that Ahn Cao? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
98. A lone republican voted nay -- wonder who it is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Graybeard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. Might be Boner himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Graybeard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #101 |
128. c-span now saying it was Johnson -IL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
100. see, the Blue Dogs aren't TOTALLY worthless..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
102. oh no, cancer objects to healthcare bill. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. This isn't a surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
103. Cantor is stalling further. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
104. Now we have to listen to Cantor stall. . What will he use to try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. God - what a royal douche. Like a petulant child. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
105. Now what's happening? Will there be hours more of debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
107. what in the HELL NOW IS THIS???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Politicub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:32 PM Response to Reply #107 |
112. This guy is making no sense. When he talks it sounds like he is whining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
108. If Cancer has a motion to recommit with instructions, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. He has five mins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
110. O Brother, here we go: Cue the tape -- songs of the beloved "tort reform." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:33 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. Call out the Whaaaaambulance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
113. lol He' s quoting Howard Dean.. who'da thunk. . it's all tort all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
114. hear cancer, stop taking dean out of context. besides tort reform only affects 1-2% of medical costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
116. I think this is kind of a thin thread to hang a stall on. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
117. medicare advantage? looks like she putting insurance company profits first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
118. Ginny Brown-Waite should changer her name to Brown-NOSE! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
119. Johnson of Illinois was the R voting against the Boner amendment. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:38 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. did he or she press the wrong button by accident or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
120. so repubs only want choice when it's ripping off seniors. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
121. Did this just turn into the House of Commons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #121 |
125. lol, I was about to say..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
123. "trial lawyers". what a bunch of sore-losing BABIES!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. Whaaaaambulance time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. no kidding!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
124. More PUKE stalling! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
129. Beginning to sound like the British Parliament. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
130. heh, so Steny Hoyer can get fired up after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
kcass1954 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #130 |
136. Seriously. Who's spine did he borrow? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
131. GO HOYER!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
132. Were those the teabaggers in the gallery, or the teabaggers in the aisles. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. Both! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RoccoR5955 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
135. Last gasp for the Boner amendment... FIFTEEN minutes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
137. HEY.. There's a NEW THREAD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
POAS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
138. Another GOP vote against the party position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
139. rather sickening how cspan gives equal time to 20% of the electorate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC