Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We have 31Dems (DINO) confirmed naysayers for HCR - I hope we replace all of them with progressives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:01 PM
Original message
We have 31Dems (DINO) confirmed naysayers for HCR - I hope we replace all of them with progressives
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 06:02 PM by ind_thinker2
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29272.html

Of the 31 no votes, 25 are members who represent seats carried by McCain—10 of those members hail from districts where McCain won 60 percent or more of the vote. Three of the remaining six are freshmen Democrats sitting in seats that were Republican-held until 2008.

At least three committee chairmen—Rep. Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.), Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.)—have also said they said they do not support the bill.

“While the House bill does take some positive steps toward increasing coverage and reforming insurance regulations, it simply falls short when it comes to lowering healthcare costs for North Florida families and businesses,” said Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) in a statement Saturday explaining why he would vote “no.”


Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. See this poll - naysayers to lose Obama voters
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6953169

The trick is to get good Dems in, rather than having teabaggers take advantage of the vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Garam_Masala Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The trick is to NOT let Rahm Emanuel hand pick dem nominee's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll cut slack to the ones in ultra blood red districts, but that's it
Bobby Bright gets a pass from me, but John Adler in New Jersey has no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. good point on the blood red ones
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 06:08 PM by emulatorloo
a teabagger would be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
independentpiney Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. As much as it pains me to say it, Adlers' district is blood red
or pretty close to it. McPalin won by a landslide here, as did bush both times. Not that I'm defending Adler, he's a self-serving asshole who won't be getting my vote again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Here is the numbers on Adler's district
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 06:56 PM by bluestateguy
There are no blood red districts in Jersey anymore. Light red? Yes, but not blood red. Adler's district voted for Obama, but narrowly for Bush in 2004.

2008: http://innovation.cq.com/atlas/district_08

2004: http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4161
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those naysaying DINOs could just be accidental heroes
Yeah, sure, replace em with real progressives who would make a bill that didn't stink like shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. yeah.. source politico.. that'll work. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. 31 no votes "so far" - "politico" reports joyfully
What a piece a shit that place is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jezebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, that's their headline. They keep adding to the numbers. They are so hoping to get enough no
votes that they can trumpet a failure for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. I see Gary Peter isn't on the list
As of yesterday, he hadn't made a decision. Anyone know where he's headed now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Politico's article breathlessly but falsely reports that...
"Just nine more “no” votes would be enough to sink the bill if Republicans maintain, as expected, a solid front of opposition."

That's false. TEN more "no" votes would stop the bill. We can afford to lose 9 more Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why? By defeating a bad bill...
...they're doing the right thing, aren't they?

And thereby bringing the day when single-payer comes to the floor closer, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Right? No way
One of the reasons REpubs are so against this bill is that they don't want the camel to get his nose under the tent.

If we get some kind of public option now then it's possible that later this public option can become single payer.

At his point, we need to prove that we can get reform.

This bill would have no chance at all if we didn't already have Medicare.

And there is absolutely no way we could get single payer at this point in time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well, you're in a minority here.
The official DU line is that we could have had single payer by Labor Day if only President Kucinich wanted it bad enough.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. I've been around long enough to know that I can't always
get all that I want!

I remember when I was dumb enough to think that it was better for Southerners to be "honest" and be REpubs rather than Dems.

Then I learned that the Southern Dems who were racist actually voted for some good programs that helped middle class people. For example, it was an Alabama Dem who helped sponsor the National Defense Education Act that provided me with a 3% loan for college. Half my loan was forgiven because I taught school for 5 years.

I don't think the Southern Repubs would EVER vote for something that helped people. They funnel loans through private companies so the companies can make a big profit off students. The same thing happened with Medicare. The Repub version of Medicare is funneled through insurance companies so the insurance companies can make big profits. The Repub version costs 14% more than the gov't run traditional Medicare.

When you hear that the Dems will cut Medicare, it's that 14% rip off that is really at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. No defeating it, pushes single payer even further away
You make the mistake of thinking they want to defeat the bill because it doesn't go far enough. The no votes, think it goes to far toward single payer
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Disgusted. I hope they just lose. Let Republicans have the seats. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Now the list has grown to 32 we have 8 more for padding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Only 8? And that's not guaranteed. We now know the 32 assholes who just want to get rich in congress
I want them all to lose. I want Obama to tell them to run as Republicans in 2010. I'm so pissed right now. Obama should threaten them instead of talking about Republicans will still attack them. He should attack them if they vote against this. I'm pissed. This has ruined my day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. i think we have votes it will be close, all DINO are coming out of closet
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. "God" the naysayers burn in hell, they are denying people basic rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. With what is happening in house, even if the bill passes tonight, no hopes in senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LovinLife Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. agree. There is no way. It will be shredded, and useless if it does. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. Allen Boyd is a farking liar. He is voting no because his constituents,
mainly retired military are against health care reform. As one told me, they are afraid that they will be put on the public option like they were put on Medicare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. No one makes them take medicare. Don't take it, buy private
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ind_thinker2 Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. No list now grown to 33, we have 7 more to pad
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC