|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:25 PM Original message |
The most important part of the House bill: it strips the insurers' anti-trust exemption |
Refresh | +21 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. Someone PLEASE tell me why the Failers are bitchin now?! Please? Thx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Just looking for anything negative to have a fit over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Because it doesn't give everyone a pony? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Because if they are proven wrong, they will lose face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. Also allows for purchase across state lines. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
burning rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. That's one of the changes Republicans largely favor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
theophilus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. But,but,but......so many on DU say this bill stinks. I think this would be great. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. it does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Pray tell WHY does it stink? Thx in advance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scarsdale Vibe (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 02:28 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. The rest of us are talking about the entirety of the bill, not one small portion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. is that what you call an insurance wet dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-31-09 12:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Debunked. Here YOU go! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Large chunks of it do, but this? This is great. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. I was glad to see that part in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Agreed-- it could have been MUCH better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. Taking away their anti-trust exemption may have more of a long-term effect than the public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. One Might Say The PO Debate Served As Great Cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is indeed critical. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-29-09 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
17. Even with the exemption gone, antitrust cases can be hard to prove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
andym (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 01:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Depends mostly on whose running the anti-trust division of the justice dept. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 02:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Not with the insurance companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 07:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I'll agree with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
18. That's a good thing, but it isn't worth the bullshit mandates n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-30-09 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
26. Odds are it'll come out in conference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC