Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baccus bill passes: 14 v. 9 nt.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 01:53 PM
Original message
Baccus bill passes: 14 v. 9 nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now the Pukes are out there pushing the Price-Waterhouse analysis and how spot on it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now this bill has to be drastically improved in reconciliation or all it will be is a big $ handout
to the health insurance cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It will be. If I remember correctly Obama has said that there will be a merging of all 5 bills.
Before the final vote on a health care reform bill. So this is not the end and with the AHIP or AIHP report seems to have energized Congress to push some serious moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. Can't be stressed enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Drastically improved?
Saying this piece of shit can be "improved" is like saying you can heal someone with burns over 95% of their body with a band-aid.

Not one word of this piece of shit is redeemable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank God it Passed!
Now on to the real work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. AMEN !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm just glad Max's role is now much smaller
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 02:16 PM by SpartanDem
no one person has screwed this up process more than Max. This bill should've been out in July, it supposed to have the first bill reported. Obama biggest mistake was not snapping Max's leash on the gang of six bs sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. The best part of this whole episode was when...
the GOP lined up to spew their nonsense to the microphones, after which they asked for questions from the press, and there were ZERO! ZERO questions asked. They are so irrelevant and so out of touch that the press doesn't even want to ask them a single question.

Enjoy that path toward the wrong side of history, GOPiggies!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. NICE!!! I'd watch a video of that for a second or tow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. So what happens next?
Reconciliation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This bill will be merged with the senate HELP bill and then that bill will be merged
with the three committee bills from the house, and then there will be something resembling a final bill that will be voted on. LOTS of work yet to be done, but things are moving forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Cross posted from GD..
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Tue Oct-13-09 01:33 PM
Original message

"Why Health Care Reform Dies if the Baucus Bill is Killed in Committee"

Many people have asked why do we need the Senate Finance Committee... and wouldn't no bill be better than a bad bill (from this committee). The answer is simply that there will be no bill in the Senate unless the Baucus bill is passed out of committee. The HCR reform bill was referred to two committees, jointly, in the Senate and as such, they must report combined legislation. The HELP committee bill jurisdiction lies with structuring the reform, while the Finance Committee jurisdiction lies in how to pay for it. If either committee kills the bill, the bill dies, period (legal text below). If both bills pass committee, then the Senate must reconcile them in conference for a vote. If the bill passes the Senate (with 51 votes), it must be reconciled with the House version.

However, if the Senate Finance Committee kills the bill, the matter is dropped entirely (the HELP bill gets no consideration), or it is referred back to committee again, and we start from square one. Given that the players aren't going to change hands, and only one member of the Senate Finance Committee is up for re-election and Senators are on 6-year cycles, the matter will likely not be reconsidered for the next 4-6 years, if ever.

Here are the rules of the Senate which cover what will happen if the Bill fails to leave committee:

http://rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Rul...


RULE XVII

REFERENCE TO COMMITTEES; MOTIONS TO DISCHARGE; REPORTS OF COMMITTEES; AND HEARINGS AVAILABLE

1. Except as provided in paragraph 3, in any case in which a controversy arises as to the jurisdiction of any committee with respect to any proposed legislation, the question of jurisdiction shall be decided by the presiding officer, without debate, in favor of the committee which has jurisdiction over the subject matter which predominates in such proposed legislation; but such decision shall be subject to an appeal.

2. A motion simply to refer shall not be open to amendment, except to add instructions.

3. (a) Upon motion by both the majority leader or his designee and the minority leader or his designee, proposed legislation may be referred to two or more committees jointly or sequentially. Notice of such motion and the proposed legislation to which it relates shall be printed in the Congressional Record. The motion shall be privileged, but it shall not be in order until the Congressional Record in which the notice is printed has been available to Senators for at least twenty-four hours. No amendment to any such motion shall be in order except amendments to any instructions contained therein. Debate on any such motion, and all amendments thereto and debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than two hours, the time to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees.

(b) Proposed legislation which is referred to two or more committees jointly may be reported only by such committees jointly and only one report may accompany any proposed legislation so jointly reported.

(c) A motion to refer any proposed legislation to two or more committees sequentially shall specify the order of referral.

(d) Any motion under this paragraph may specify the portion or portions of proposed legislation to be considered by the committees, or any of them, to which such proposed legislation is referred, and such committees or committee shall be limited, in the consideration of such proposed legislation, to the portion or portions so specified.

(e) Any motion under this subparagraph may contain instructions with respect to the time allowed for consideration by the committees, or any of them, to which proposed legislation is referred and the discharge of such committees, or any of them, from further consideration of such proposed legislation.

4. (a) All reports of committees and motions to discharge a committee from the consideration of a subject, and all subjects from which a committee shall be discharged, shall lie over one day for consideration, unless by unanimous consent the Senate shall otherwise direct.

(b) Whenever any committee (except the Committee on Appropriations) has reported any measure, by action taken in conformity with the requirements of paragraph 7 of rule XXVI, no point of order shall lie with respect to that measure on the ground that hearings upon that measure by the committee were not conducted in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 4 of rule XXVI.

5. Any measure or matter reported by any standing committee shall not be considered in the Senate unless the report of that committee upon that measure or matter has been available to Members for at least two calendar days (excluding Sundays and legal holidays) prior to the consideration of that measure or matter. If hearings have been held on any such measure or matter so reported, the committee reporting the measure or matter shall make every reasonable effort to have such hearings printed and available for distribution to the Members of the Senate prior to the consideration of such measure or matter in the Senate. This paragraph

(1) may be waived by joint agreement of the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader of the Senate; and

(2) shall not apply to

(A) any measure for the declaration of war, or the declaration of a national emergency, by the Congress, and

(B) any executive decision, determination, or action which would become, or continue to be, effective unless disapproved or otherwise invalidated by one or both Houses of Congress.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6765334
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thank you SO much!
I really appreciate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're Welcome..I was
happy to come across it, too:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Please learn to spell the senator's name
It's Boughtkus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. My bad. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. I've been away from the computer for a few hours.
Based on the usernames of the DUers who are upset and the DUers who are happy...

it appears to be some very good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Considering, I'd say, YES. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Does anyone have a list of the 9 on the committee who didn't voe for this?!
But it seemed it would have passed with or without Snowe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Off the top of my head, Enzi, Ensign, Hatch, Grassley. Can't think of the five others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. The house bill and senate bill will all have to be reconciled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC