Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sigh... It might be better if Snowe voted NO

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:19 PM
Original message
Sigh... It might be better if Snowe voted NO
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 12:39 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Now the Finance Bill will be the bipartisan bill and thus the only legitimate "serious" bill in the eyes of the punditocracy.

All deviations from the Baucus bill will be "partisan" and "far left."

The presumed potential upside is that her participation will have a big effect on public perceptions of HCR. If she said she was going to vote for whatever ends up coming out of conference that would be awesome news, and well worth some celebration. But since she is opposed to any sort of PO she will not be offering her super pug-endorsement of any final bill worth voting for. In fact, her comments today are almost a promise to play Lucy pulling away the football at some more sensitive juncture. Thus she will probably eventually be hurting public perception of any eventual worthwhile bill while covering her ass.

That seems a lot to give up in exchange for passing a bill out of committee that was already going to pass in committee. (Getting the thing out of committee is important and if she were the only way to do that I'd have a different view.)

And when she votes against the final bill (which she will unless it's a real piece of crap) it will "show" that Reid went far-left (snort!) making it impossible for even a supremely reasonable bi-partisan person like Snowe to vote for it. Meanwhile she will be able to say she was for HCR.

But hey, we elected her President, right? So we have only ourselves to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I understand the argument but disagree.
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 12:24 PM by jefferson_dem
The more we can get on the "reform" bandwagon (I know...some will say the Baucus Bill is not reform), the better. Positive momentum has been building since the CBO score and that's a good thing.

At any rate, LIEberman has stepped up to balance out Snowe's support. Does that make you happy? :)
EDIT to add link: http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/13/lieberman-baucus-bill/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. My problem is one of direction. When she eventually votes no that will be bad PR
It would be great if she was not going to withdraw her support down the road, but I think her inevitable back-stab will be a more opinion-shaping. (And at a more sensitive juncture.)

Ironically, by pretending to play ball now when she does cave she will be putting intense pressure on Conrad and Lincoln and such.

I am not suicidal about it, but see a net-negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It is important to note that she framed her yes vote as an historic opportunity to create
positive health care reform.

She may vote no on the final bill but support now may signal that she will oppose a filibuster, which is all we really need from her.

If she had voted no now, we would be all but assured that she is prepared to join the ranks of obstructionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If she is going to vote for cloture that would be a good thing
I figure she will do the bare minimum to cover her ass in Maine.

Not being a Mainer I don't know exactly what that entails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only reason it is good is because they can finally move on out of the Finance Committee
where this bill was stuck for months now and start working on a bill.

Now, it is up to the leadership to make sure the bill is decent. That is a different question that does not need to involve Snowe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I still would have prefered she voted NO, however. She is pulling the bill to the right just as was
done for the stimulus.

This said, this gives cover for Rockefeller to vote NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chuckles Todd agrees -
Snowe's support for Senate Finance Cmte bill means Reid-Baucus-WH are running health care bill; House Dems and Dodd less influential now.

http://twitter.com/chucktpolitical/statuses/4839750770
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hey, I can't be held responsible for the Chuckster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Come to think of it...
I have yet to see you and Chuckster at the same place at the same time.

Hmmm...

Chuckster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, I think so but according to all the DU experts on health care reform here,
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 12:32 PM by Cleita
I'm wrong. Never mind that I have been right about this process since the beginning when I said we were being thrown under the bus and in the end there would be no access to Medicare for all as a public option. None of that happened and then suddenly there was no public option either. But even though I have been right all along, I'm still wrong and so are you according to the "experts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. The punditocracy hasn't been right very much durning this debate
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 12:48 PM by SpartanDem
HCR and the public option was dead at the end August according to them, they can think what they want, but there is a lot game left to be played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Isn't it more fun to relish in every potential failure though? By the way, I agree with your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The punditocracy has shaped opinion. (They are almost never right)
When you have a complex initiative that almost nobody understands in detail people rely on 'experts' in forming opinion.

And, sadly, recent evidence suggests that prior veracity is not a big factor in who folks listen to. Scott Ritter's views on Iran are treated with roughly the same contempt as his almost-uniquely correct views on Iraq. He doesn't have a TV show or op-ed column.

Meanwhile Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol retain influential perches despite never having been right about anything.

The punditocracy isn't about being right so much as promulgating a world-view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. R.I.P Public Option -- And i was expecting the lousy "triggered" PO to come out of all this but now
it looks like the shift is more towards the more disasturous Baucus bill now that Snoew is more in favor of it. Not sure which is the lesser of two evils: a triggered PO or the scheme of the Finance bill. There is still more time but with Reid, and the WH now salivating that they have Snowe they are more likely to keep the final bill in that direction, thus no PO of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Which is why the likes of Rockefeller, Schumer, Harken et al gave up hope on a PO long ago.
...... please! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think at some point the wishful thinkers' heads are going to explode. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. lol, I dont know that "wishful" is the word I would use.....
.... but either way, I've got some crow stored away in the freezer (as all fans of Southeastern Conference football keep as a staple this time of year.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC