|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
subterranean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:35 AM Original message |
Would the public option add signficant costs to health care reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
1. The only significant cost factor is need base subsidies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
georgian style (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. Washington Post's Ezra Klein: CBO says PO "would save $150 billion over 10 years" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-13-09 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, studies have been done about public health care vs. private health |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC