Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What health care reform is acceptable other than single payer because single payer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 06:46 PM
Original message
What health care reform is acceptable other than single payer because single payer
is NOT going to happen. It doesn't matter whether we think it is the best option or not. It is not going to pass. And I would challenge those who are single payer or nothing to list the 51 (not even 60) senators who will vote for it. You are pressing for something the president cannot and will not deliver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nor is it something that Obama or the congressional leadership promised.
Or even campaigned on.

Single payer was never on the table, everybody knows that, but the perpetual whiners will do what they do best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This may be true, but in taking it off the table, Obama neutered our negotiations
Instead of a strong public option to compromise on, now the compromised compromises are being compromised, and the left is feeling hung out to dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Obama ran for president promising people could keep their plans if they liked them
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 06:58 PM by tritsofme
Any indication of support for single payer would break that campaign promise.

If the left is feeling hung out to dry, it is only because reality is catching up with them. Don't be surprised when things you were never promised don't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. How about you'll be stuck with your plans if you like them or not?

That's a more accurate description of what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good,
you obviously think that scenario is better than Obama's plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. The single payer would get less compromise
Since it has no prayer of passing, there is no reason for the insurance companies and others to trade off anything to stop it.

The fat cats are terrified of effective moderates. They laugh off the zealots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He never campaigned on not bombing the shit out of Sri Lanka
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 09:53 PM by Oregone
So lets fucking kill `em all, eh? We wouldn't want "doing the right thing" to compromise the integrity of a campaign



BTW, I never heard him mention "Cash for Clunkers" on the campaign trail. Oh Obama!!! How could you!!! If only we of known!



(And yes, Im not intending to make sense. Im reciprocating idiocy. A campaign is about getting elected. We should hope governing is about doing the right thing in the interest of the country)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing personal, OP, but I am SERIOUSLY tired of people telling me single payer won't happen.
It will. The only question is WHEN.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. In the US, you see both socialized insurance (Medicare) and socialized health care (VA hospitals)
And yet people suggest Medicare for All is impossible. Disgusting right-wing meme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I will be satisfied with a bill that protects people with preexisting illnesses,
is transferable from one job to another and includes a public option but I will not be satisfied with any bill that does not include the Kucinich amendment to allow states to create their own single payer program. The last is the key - I understand that is how Canada created its current program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And more limited benefits at a higher cost to you!

That's the real plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Oh, you have
personal knowledge that that's the real plan or are you spewing bullshit as normal?

You're clueless as to what the real plan is because you're to damn busy running around 24/7/365 trying to find as many articles as you can slamming Obama.

Give up the charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-09-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Extending Medicare incrementally using the established infrastructure
Edited on Sun Aug-09-09 09:46 PM by Oregone
That would work for a start. Single-Payer catastrophic (with deductible set on "affordability" quotient) would work to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. No public option = No mandate
That's the dealbreaker I'd like to insist on. It's outrageous to force taxpayers to fund additional profits for the bloated health insurance corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC